Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14224

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date Thu, 07 Jul 2022 21:40:01 +0200
Message-ID <EGFvX-9Ozm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <EDlap-7OvH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jul 7 19:36:49 2022
Old-Return-Path <073plan@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-9.352 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AJIora92q01VvmAS++21qULbm33gOi4HczGX8xq4WMrvhU7nFZqT6M44 orbmqN73JNQWmgN2eUX89Og=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AGRyM1v8wvUBPN8fAo3ms70QME4wiCGF1KF3mCH1dHzc7LuCRNTJYXlwyBXoOjImfDW9j4Ki7HW1pw==
X-Received by 2002:a05:622a:40c:b0:31c:7fe3:ea6 with SMTP id n12-20020a05622a040c00b0031c7fe30ea6mr39803513qtx.541.1657222592660; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 12:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization Debian Project
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gkg7S00v2KB0Hu8I08bq"
User-Agent Evolution 3.44.3-1
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20056
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/17ec1b326da557e7eb479d56d7a1b6e3172c0cc3.camel@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 64
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:36:30 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <17ec1b326da557e7eb479d56d7a1b6e3172c0cc3.camel@debian.org>
X-Original-References <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14224

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400,Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道:
> On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
> > 
> > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is
> > there
> > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that,
> > what
> > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Boyuan Yang
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517
> > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517
> 
> Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the
> "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and
> let people know they can migrate to it.

This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 .

Cheers,
Boyuan Yang

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web