Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2307
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.backup-software, comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? |
| Date | 2012-01-07 14:46 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <9mptrrFgd3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <078d0503-909a-4956-a6bd-3282e9945e31@dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <8tFNq.163769$ql3.77755@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com> <9mp6gsFg7lU1@mid.individual.net> <eOJNq.187349$xz3.2355@en-nntp-11.dc1.easynews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
GMAN wrote: > In article <9mp6gsFg7lU1@mid.individual.net>, "Rod Speed" > <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> GMAN wrote >>> AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> wrote >> >>>> I was talking to tech support about cloning all 4 partitions in my >>>> Toshiba Satellite A660 laptop to a smaller auxiliary HDD (not >>>> creating an image, but a clone -- recoverable image may be in the >>>> plans in the future). If the laptop HDD suffers a hardware >>>> failure, I can drop the clone into the laptop, be up and running >>>> (and source down a new HDD). Alternatively, the newer (faster) HDD >>>> can displace the current HDD. >> >>>> From asking in forums, partition 1 is for booting, partition 2 is >>>> the C-drive, and partitions 3 & 4 are for various recovery >>>> operations and content. According to experienced posters, Acronis >>>> True Image and Norton Ghost will both adjust partition 2 in the >>>> cloning process so that all partititions fit in the target HDD, >>>> without requiring the partitions to be resized in the source HDD. >>>> I find it reassuring that I don't have to mess with the partitions >>>> on the source HDD until I've confirmed the integrity & full >>>> functionality of all partitions in the target HDD. >> >>>> However, one Toshiba forum poster said that shrinking partition 2 >>>> causes partitions 3 & 4 to start at lower locations, and he found >>>> that the recovery functionality was lost. I didn't ask for further >>>> details but there are two functions he could be referring to: (1) >>>> the creationg of recovery discs using a dedicated Toshiba app and >>>> (2) restoring to factory state (Toshiba's are designed to do this >>>> by pressing 0 during power up). I want to retain both functions >>>> (1) and (2) in the clone. >> >>> The second you booted that laptop out of the box new, you should >>> have proceeded to create those recovery DVD's using the built in >>> app. >> >> No need to do it that urgently when it will be replaced under >> warranty >> if it fails very early before its been used for anything much. > Most the time, the warranty doesnt cover when someone messes up their > pc due to a software issue. You dont need the recovery disks for that, thats what the diskless recovery is for. > Like if someone went and manually deleted a critical > windows DLL , the pc manufacturer would just tell the > customer to resintall from their recover disks or partition. And since that doesnt affect the recovery partition, you dont need the recovery disks. > Maybe its different there in Australia, but here in the > US software issues are not covered under warranty. Thats just plain wrong if the software is faulty as supplied. >> The reason its desirable to ensure that they can be created anytime is because >> it isnt hard to mislay the recovery disks after they have been created. > Agreed, but most pc makers ony allow the creation of > 1 set of disks and then the software wont create anymore. He says that that isnt true with that Toshiba. > I always copy the disks after i have made the > recovery set and keep them at a relatives house. I dont bother, because they are buyable in the unlikely event that your house burns down or is washed away by a flood etc. If I need to use them after an event like that, the laptop is normally history too.
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 16:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 17:57 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-06 09:46 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-07 08:02 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 21:55 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:12 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:50 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 16:27 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 08:14 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 21:35 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 14:46 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 22:07 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:19 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-08 06:28 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:51 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:33 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-07 15:44 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:09 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Krypsis <krypsis@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-01-08 01:40 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 06:54 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:19 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:56 +0000
csiph-web