Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2336
| From | Arno <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.backup-software, comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? |
| Date | 2012-01-07 22:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9ms0kcFsn8U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <eOJNq.187349$xz3.2355@en-nntp-11.dc1.easynews.com> <9mptrrFgd3U1@mid.individual.net> <abb68bac-a7d6-4bc9-9fa3-e9b7bf84d355@p4g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <9mr2ioFcrbU3@mid.individual.net> <9mrko1F3orU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage john james <jj@jj.com> wrote: > Arno wrote: >> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage AndyHancock >> <andymhancock@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Jan 6, 10:46 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote: >> [...] >> >>>>> Maybe its different there in Australia, but here in the >>>>> US software issues are not covered under warranty. >>>> >>>> Thats just plain wrong if the software is faulty as supplied. >> >>> I'm in Canada, and I'm not sure what the rule is. >> In all the world the rule is that at the very most you can give it back for a refound. > Wrong, as always. Ah, mister clueless at it again. Pathetic, as always. Arno >> Even if it sets your house on fire, > Wrong, as always. >> unless you can prove intent (basically impossible), > Wrong, as always. >> you get nothing. > Wrong, as always. >> Software vendors make very sure that you have no rights, > They cant dod that in any jurisdiction with even half a clue. >> as they do know their products typically are defective by any sane engineering criteria. > Even sillier. -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 16:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 17:57 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-06 09:46 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-07 08:02 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 21:55 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:12 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:50 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 16:27 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 08:14 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 21:35 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 14:46 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 22:07 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:19 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-08 06:28 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:51 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:33 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-07 15:44 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:09 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Krypsis <krypsis@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-01-08 01:40 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 06:54 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:19 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:56 +0000
csiph-web