Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage > #2314
| From | Arno <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.backup-software, comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? |
| Date | 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9mr2c4FcrbU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <078d0503-909a-4956-a6bd-3282e9945e31@dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9mnu83FgnkU1@mid.individual.net> <c3a06bcd-4b6f-4454-a6ff-d172cc687097@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 6, 4:46 am, Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote: >> In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage AndyHancock <andymhanc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> My main question is: How is it that you can shrink a C-drive partition >>> without fear of amputating content in the space that becomes unused >>> space? >> >> Depends on the approach. If you shrink the filesystem first and then >> the partition, all data is retained. If you just shring the partition, >> the effect you describe takes place. > I'm beginning to realize that it depends on the cloning app, since it > is the thing that is compressing the partition on the fly. >> I would recommend getting a disk that you just can to a 1:1 >> clone to. A bit more expensive, but a lot less change of >> desaster, i.e. loss of the current disk. In any case before >> attempting dangerous operations like a filesystem and/or >> paertition resize, a full backup is non-optional. > The target HDD is a bit smaller than the source HDD (500 vs 640 GB), > but both are way, way more than I ever expect to need. The next step > up is in the order of 750 GB, and way more expensive due to the > current shortage of HDDs (heck even the 500GB was 3x normal price). > I intend to test the clone before relying on it. Both Norton Ghost > and Acronis True Image are capable of targeting a smaller partition > during cloning, according to forum responses. You can also clone 1:1 partition by partition and shrink them individually before cloning the next one. >> Oh, and stay away from Parition Magic. It has a nasty habit >> of crashing in the middle of the process and messing up >> the disk beyond recovery in the process. > Point taken. Thanks. As to app, I made good experiences on two Win 7 installations (Lenove T510i and Samsung n140) shrinking the pre-install with gparted on Linux. It does not clone though AFAIK. (Could be mistaken.) Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-05 16:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 17:57 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-06 09:46 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-07 08:02 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 21:55 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:15 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:12 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:50 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 16:27 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 08:14 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-06 21:35 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 14:46 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-06 22:07 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 14:19 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "john james" <jj@jj.com> - 2012-01-08 06:28 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:51 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:33 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:31 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Winniethepooh@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) - 2012-01-07 15:44 +0000
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 07:09 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Krypsis <krypsis@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-01-08 01:40 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2012-01-08 06:54 +1100
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? AndyHancock <andymhancock@gmail.com> - 2012-01-07 13:19 -0800
Re: Does shrinking a partition lop off content at top of partition? Arno <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-07 22:56 +0000
csiph-web