Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

8094 articles, 881 threads (numbers 462 – 8594) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
hard drives for backup (5 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 15:12 -0500
   → Re: hard drives for backup Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 15:22 -0500
     → Re: hard drives for backup ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-06-27 22:14 +0000
       → Re: hard drives for backup Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 02:41 -0500
         → Re: hard drives for backup Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 16:16 -0500
           → Re: hard drives for backup Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 15:46 -0500
 
[Spam] Re: NAOMI TALKS: USB Stick Encryption Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202603.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> 2026-03-14 00:43 +0100
 
“Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” (29 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 02:56 -0600
   → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 19:45 +0800
     → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 11:16 -0500
       → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-29 00:18 +0800
         → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 21:05 -0500
     → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-28 11:31 -0600
   → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 10:51 -0500
     → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-11-28 23:55 +0800
       → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> 2025-12-04 19:46 +0800
         → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-04 19:57 +0800
           → Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� Same Guy <was@another.address> 2025-12-04 08:01 -0800
           → Re: Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2025-12-08 20:20 -0500
         → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-05 12:57 -0600
           → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) 2025-12-06 05:49 +1000
             → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-12-05 19:12 -0500
             → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 14:17 +0800
               → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:35 -0600
             → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:38 -0600
               → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-12-07 00:06 -0500
                 → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-08 20:17 -0600
           → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-12-05 22:44 -0600
           → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 14:20 +0800
             → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-12-06 22:34 -0600
       → Re: Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2025-12-08 20:31 -0500
     → Re: "Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory -- 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible" not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) 2025-11-29 07:37 +1000
   → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-28 12:24 -0600
     → Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-11-28 13:37 -0600
       → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-28 21:32 -0500
       → Re: �Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory � 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible� VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2025-11-29 02:18 -0600
         → Re: “Seagate achieves a whopping 6.9TB storage capacity per platter in its laboratory — 55TB to 69TB hard drives now physically possible” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-29 04:24 -0500
 
“Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” (3 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-11 21:51 -0600
   → Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-12 05:06 -0500
     → Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-11-12 16:08 -0600
       → Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q3 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-11-12 19:40 -0500
 
“Are Hard Drives Getting Better? Let’s Revisit the Bathtub Curve” (1 reply — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-10-16 23:01 -0500
   → Re: �Are Hard Drives Getting Better? Let�s Revisit the Bathtub Curve� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-10-20 23:31 -0500
 
No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD (5 replies — unroll) anon <anon@invalid.org> 2025-08-31 04:21 +0000
   → Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-31 20:22 +0800
   → Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-31 23:48 +0800
   → Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2025-08-31 20:37 +0100
     → Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-08-31 17:33 -0400
       → Re: No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Daniel70 <daniel47@somewhere.someplaceelse> 2025-09-01 19:30 +1000
 
No, a Windows update probably didn't brick your SSD Social Media Retards <retrards@tiktok.com> 2025-09-01 11:02 +0200
 
“Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” (2 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-08-05 22:21 -0500
   → Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2025-08-06 12:08 +0800
   → Re: “Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025” Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2025-08-06 05:38 -0400
 
"Seagate unveils 30TB HAMR HDDs for the masses — laser-powered IronWolf Pro and Exos drives are now widely available" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-07-22 17:26 -0500
 
Thecus N4100EVO question Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> 2025-06-26 22:15 +0200
 
“Petabyte-Class E2 SSDs Poised to Disrupt Warm Data Storage” (1 reply — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-06-04 20:55 -0500
   → Re: �Petabyte-Class E2 SSDs Poised to Disrupt Warm Data Storage� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-06-04 23:39 -0500
 
USB write cache (1 reply — unroll) "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> 2025-04-08 00:19 -0400
   → Re: USB write cache Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-04-08 00:00 -0500
 
“Astera Labs Demonstrates PCIe 6.0 SSD Reaching 27 GB/s” Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-03-12 16:16 -0500
 
"Western Digital to unveil 44TB HAMR HDDs in 2026, 100TB in 2030" (1 reply — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-02-15 13:58 -0600
   → Re: "Western Digital to unveil 44TB HAMR HDDs in 2026, 100TB in 2030" Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-02-15 14:21 -0600
 
Dual Floppy Woes (6 replies — unroll) Robert Chippendale <rchipp@sdf.org> 2025-01-25 19:32 +1100
   → Re: Dual Floppy Woes bp@www.zefox.net 2025-01-25 17:59 +0000
     → Re: Dual Floppy Woes Robert Chippendale <rchipp@sdf.org> 2025-01-27 10:47 +1100
   → Re: Dual Floppy Woes Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-01-25 22:45 -0600
     → Re: Dual Floppy Woes Robert Chippendale <rchipp@sdf.org> 2025-01-26 17:14 +1100
       → Re: Dual Floppy Woes someone@not.me 2025-01-26 06:06 -0500
       → Re: Dual Floppy Woes jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2025-01-31 01:31 +0000
 
“Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced” (6 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-01-22 18:23 -0600
   → Re: �Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced� Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-01-23 01:13 -0600
     → Re: Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-01-23 17:06 -0600
       → Re: Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2025-01-24 00:04 +0000
         → Re: Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> 2025-01-23 18:43 -0600
           → Re: Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2025-01-24 01:29 +0000
         → Re: Seagate Exos M 36TB HDDs Announced Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2025-01-23 20:16 -0600
 
Corsair not longer honoring its warranty? (2 replies — unroll) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> 2024-10-30 16:03 -0300
   → Re: Corsair not longer honoring its warranty? jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) 2024-11-01 22:25 +0000
     → Re: Corsair not longer honoring its warranty? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> 2024-11-01 20:42 -0300
 
“Microsoft leverages robotics and AI to disassemble and recycle defective hard disks to reach a 90% reuse and recycle rate by 2025” (2 replies — unroll) Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2024-09-17 18:58 -0500
   → Re: “Microsoft leverages robotics and AI to disassemble and recycle defective hard disks to reach a 90% reuse and recycle rate by 2025” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2024-09-17 19:48 -0500
     → Re: “Microsoft leverages robotics and AI to disassemble and recycle defective hard disks to reach a 90% reuse and recycle rate by 2025” VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2024-09-17 19:55 -0500
 
Western Digital plans to separate its HDD and Flash businesses Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> 2024-09-16 13:38 -0500
 
Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? (5 replies — unroll) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2024-07-26 15:35 +0000
   → Re: Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> 2024-07-26 15:00 -0300
   → Re: Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2024-07-26 17:21 -0500
   → Re: Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2024-07-26 23:57 +0000
     → Re: Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> 2024-07-26 21:45 -0500
       → Re: Do all modern USB flash sticks get very hot? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2024-07-27 23:18 +0000

~Page 1 of ~45 (articles 8511–8594) Older →

csiph-web