Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #160773

Re: Computers anyone?

From Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: Computers anyone?
Date 2016-03-09 20:25 -0800
Organization Wheeler&Wheeler
Message-ID <874mcfvu0v.fsf@garlic.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <4qidnScPE9p74X3LnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <MPG.314a6ff2b42ffe7e989fcf@news.eternal-september.org> <87d1r3w2um.fsf@garlic.com> <878u1rw1w6.fsf@garlic.com> <MPG.314aa66f620af605989fd4@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw


"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> writes:
> The F-35 is a fine example of why a committee should not be allowed to
> design airplanes, and more importantly why a committee containing
> representatives of the Air Force should not be allowed to participate
> in the design of naval aircraft.

This is F-22: Can't Fly Won't Die
http://nypost.com/2009/07/17/cant-fly-wont-die/

Pilots call high-maintenance aircraft "hangar queens."  Well, the F-22's
a hangar empress. After three expensive decades in development, the
plane meets fewer than one-third of its specified requirements.

...

Anyway, an enemy wouldn't have to down a single F-22 to defeat it. Just
strike the hi-tech maintenance sites, and it's game over. (In WWII, we
didn't shoot down every Japanese Zero; we just sank their carriers.) The
F-22 isn't going to operate off a dirt strip with a repair tent.

But this is all about lobbying, not about lobbing bombs. Cynically,
Lockheed Martin distributed the F-22 workload to nearly every state,
employing under-qualified sub-contractors to create local financial
stakes in the program. Great politics -- but the result has been a
quality collapse.

... snip ...

finally ended F-22 ... but used same tactics with F-35 process.
http://www.dailytech.com/Defense+Secretary+Gates+Proposes+Ending+F22+Fighter+VH71+Helicopter+Production/article14776.htm

Originally F-35 design did cost(?) reduced compromise as bomb truck
assuming F-22 flying cover and provide air superiority role.

this has long detailed discussion changes from original prototype and
"true" stealth (analysis done before F-22 was terminated)
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-01.html

diagram 4 has F-35 radar signature at different wavelengths.  VHF/L can
find/track but difficult for targeting. latest processing chips with
multi-band radar ... for tracking&targeting.
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-01.html#mozTocId269596

This is separate from design/weight penalty for enabling (F-35B) Marine
corp version (short take-off-land).

besides "cyberdumb" in problems with the F-35 program
http://www.pogo.org/straus/issues/weapons/2016/the-f-35-still-failing-to-impress.html

there is lots of "cyberdumb" with adversaries dancing
through our networks taking detailed designs of advanced
weapons
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2013/05/28/us-weapons-compromised-chinese-cyberspies/

The designs included those for the advanced Patriot missile system,
known as PAC-3; an Army system for shooting down ballistic missiles,
known as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD; and the
Navy's Aegis ballistic-missile defense system.Also identified in the
report are vital combat aircraft and ships, including the F/A-18 fighter
jet, the V-22 Osprey, the Black Hawk helicopter and the Navy's new
Littoral Combat Ship, which is designed to patrol waters close to
shore. Also on the list is the most expensive weapons system ever built
-- the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which is on track to cost about $1.4
trillion.

... snip ...

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Computers anyone? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-03-09 08:22 +0000
  Re: Computers anyone? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 19:25 +1100
  Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-09 13:41 +0000
    Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-09 06:48 -0700
    Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-09 14:00 +0000
      Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:46 +1100
    Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:40 +1100
    Re: Computers anyone? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-03-09 13:50 -0600
    Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:32 -0500
      Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-10 13:24 +0000
        Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:56 -0500
        Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 07:29 -0700
          Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:19 -0500
          Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
            Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 04:02 +1100
              Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-12 13:34 +0000
                Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 04:35 +1100
                Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:54 -0500
                Re: Computers anyone? pechter@chuckie.(none) (William Pechter) - 2016-03-12 20:51 +0000
                Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-13 07:44 +0000
                Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-04-11 17:00 -0400
                Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:07 -0400
          Re: Computers anyone? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-03-12 15:10 -0800
          Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-12 18:03 -0800
            Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 18:34 -0800
            Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 15:28 +1100
  Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-09 14:08 +0000
  Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 14:41 +0000
  Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 07:27 -0800
    Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:44 -0600
      Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 20:15 +0000
      Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:38 -0500
        Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:14 -0800
          Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:35 -0800
            Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:31 -0500
              Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 20:25 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
                Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:47 +0000
                Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:54 -0500
                Re: Computers anyone? Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2016-03-30 12:47 -0400
                Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:01 +1100
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 09:04 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:28 +1100
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:44 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 19:28 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 06:16 -0500
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 12:37 -0800
                Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-17 09:25 -0700
        Re: Computers anyone? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-03-09 21:35 -0600
          Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:52 +0000
            Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:55 -0500
        Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-10 13:53 +0000
          Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:21 -0600
            Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:17 -0800
            Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:29 -0500
          Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:17 -0500
      Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 16:42 -0800
        Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:19 -0500
  Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-09 12:13 -0500
    Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 +1100
      Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-10 06:37 -0500
  Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:39 -0600
    Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
      Re: Computers anyone? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-03-10 09:43 -0600
      Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:06 -0600
        Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
        Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-11 14:10 +0000
          Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-11 16:21 +0000
          Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 17:04 -0700
            Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-12 18:04 +0000
              Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:32 +0000
                Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-03-21 20:17 -0400
            Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:30 +0000
  Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-09 12:14 -0800
  Re: Computers anyone? hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2016-03-12 07:34 +0000
    Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-12 07:30 -0700

csiph-web