Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #160867
| From | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Computers anyone? |
| Date | 2016-03-11 10:37 -0800 |
| Organization | Wheeler&Wheeler |
| Message-ID | <87bn6klv2s.fsf@garlic.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <878u1rw1w6.fsf@garlic.com> <MPG.314aa66f620af605989fd4@news.eternal-september.org> <874mcfvu0v.fsf@garlic.com> <87bn6lzoad.fsf@garlic.com> <MPG.314c72fc50b4aa21989fe1@news.eternal-september.org> |
"J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> writes: > A bomb pickup-truck perhaps--short range and small payload, vs the bomb > 18-wheeler that is the B-52. the F-35 stealth optimized for penetrating enemy ground-to-air defenses ... large numbers of F-35 then drop payload to take out all the ground-to-air defenses ... so they have nothing to worry about on their backside when returning ... and F-22 flying cover for any air-to-air threats. problem is latest generation of advanced chips with multi-band radar can track & target stealth. the B-52 hasn't been overlooked ... there are proposals using large flock of F-35s out in front trailed by fleet of B-52 stuffed entirely full ... with the F-35s providing targeting for the arsenal carried by the B-52s. I posted a snarky comment about the spin in the B-52 proposal wording as "complement/supplement the F-35" ... as opposed to "compensate for the F-35 shortcomings". since the F-35 payload is so small, the trailing B-52s would provide the air-to-air and air-to-ground arsenal needed for the mission. Pentagon "Arsenal Plane" Likely to be Modified B-52 http://www.scout.com/military/warrior/story/1650624-pentagon-arsenal-plane-likely-to-be-b-52 The Pentagon Is Building the "Arsenal Plane," a Giant Flying Battlewagon http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/news/a19262/pentagon-announces-arsenal-plane-platform/ In theory, the F35 are manned "scouts" and the arsenal plane could be a drone (all part of justifying F35 and keeping it from being killed off). This Map Shows Why The F-35 Has Turned Into A Trillion-Dollar Fiasco http://www.businessinsider.com/this-map-explains-the-f-35-fiasco-2014-8 Flawed F-35 Too Big to Kill as Lockheed Hooks 45 States http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-02-22/flawed-f-35-fighter-too-big-to-kill-as-lockheed-hooks-45-states military-industrial(-congressional) complex posts http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submisc.html#military.industrial.complex More realistic would be swarms of drone scouts with any humans back in the arsenal plane. -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Computers anyone? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-03-09 08:22 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 19:25 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-09 13:41 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-09 06:48 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-09 14:00 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:46 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:40 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-03-09 13:50 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-10 13:24 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:56 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 07:29 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:19 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 04:02 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-12 13:34 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 04:35 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:54 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? pechter@chuckie.(none) (William Pechter) - 2016-03-12 20:51 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-13 07:44 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-04-11 17:00 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:07 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-03-12 15:10 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-12 18:03 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 18:34 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 15:28 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-09 14:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 14:41 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 07:27 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:44 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 20:15 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:38 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:14 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:35 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:31 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 20:25 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:54 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2016-03-30 12:47 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:01 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 09:04 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:28 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:44 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 19:28 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 06:16 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-11 10:37 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 12:37 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-17 09:25 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-03-09 21:35 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:52 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-10 13:53 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:21 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:17 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:29 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:17 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 16:42 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:19 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-09 12:13 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-10 06:37 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:39 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-03-10 09:43 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:06 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-11 14:10 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-11 16:21 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 17:04 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-12 18:04 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:32 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-03-21 20:17 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:30 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-09 12:14 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2016-03-12 07:34 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-12 07:30 -0700
csiph-web