Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #161157
| From | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Computers anyone? |
| Date | 2016-03-17 09:25 -0700 |
| Organization | Wheeler&Wheeler |
| Message-ID | <87oaad3wd7.fsf@garlic.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <874mcfvu0v.fsf@garlic.com> <87bn6lzoad.fsf@garlic.com> <MPG.314c72fc50b4aa21989fe1@news.eternal-september.org> <87bn6klv2s.fsf@garlic.com> <87fuvva0wa.fsf@garlic.com> |
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Is Still a Huge Mess; Test report underscores ongoing problems with the world's biggest warplane program http://warisboring.com/articles/the-f-35-joint-strike-fighter-is-still-a-huge-mess/ F-35 Chief: Think Very, Very Hard Before Making Another Joint Fighter http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/03/f-35-chief-think-very-very-hard-making-another-joint-fighter/126587/? U.S. General Admits F-35 Is Actually Three Separate Airplanes; Commonality is a myth for 'joint' stealth fighter http://warisboring.com/articles/u-s-general-admits-f-35-is-actually-three-separate-airplanes/ Military Admits Billion-Dollar War Toy F-35 Is F**ked http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/17/military-admits-billion-dollar-war-toy-f-35-is-f-ked.html That assumed that the F-35A, F-35B and F-35C would be highly similar. You'd build one basic fuselage and cockpit and fit different wings or the extra engine, as needed. The military aimed for 70-percent "commonality." In other words, three-quarters of, say, an Air Force F-35A would match, for example, a Navy F-35C. 70-percent commonality proved impossible as each military branch demanded increasingly specific qualities in its F-35s. As a result, today the various models are mostly incompatible. "It's 20- to 25-percent commonality," Bogdan said on March 10. ... snip ... 20yrs ago we spent some time talking to BCS about commonality in 757 and 767 (and others) .... not that the planes were common but they had huge amount of common sub-components. Scenario was 50yrs on, could you part out one kind of plane for spare parts repairing other kind of planes. The issue was that the engineering design was in proprietary DBMS which didn't provide an interface to query where were all specific sub=components in a plane (furthermore the parent of the engineering design application was associated with Boeing's major competitor). Trivia: as undergraduate in the 60s, I had been hired as a fulltime Boeing employee to help with the formation of BCS (consolidate all dataprocessing in an independent business unit to better monetize the investment, including offering services to non-Boeing entities; one of the precursors to public cloud). Other trivia: I worked on the original RDBMS (System/R) ... but was also called in to help with implementation of a different kind of relational DBMS. System/R had some implementation optimization to make account number-based financial transactions (single key) more efficient. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#systemr The other kind of relational DBMS was specifically designed for being able to simultaneously deal with information from multiple different arbitrary views (as well as supporting NULLS and 3-value logic). -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Computers anyone? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-03-09 08:22 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 19:25 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-09 13:41 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-09 06:48 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-09 14:00 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:46 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:40 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-03-09 13:50 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:32 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-10 13:24 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:56 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 07:29 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:19 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 04:02 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-12 13:34 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 04:35 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 15:54 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? pechter@chuckie.(none) (William Pechter) - 2016-03-12 20:51 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-13 07:44 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-04-11 17:00 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:07 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-03-12 15:10 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-12 18:03 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 18:34 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 15:28 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-09 14:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 14:41 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 07:27 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:44 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-09 20:15 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 17:38 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:14 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 17:35 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:31 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 20:25 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:54 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Alan Bowler <atbowler@thinkage.ca> - 2016-03-30 12:47 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:01 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 09:04 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 04:28 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:44 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 19:28 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 06:16 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-11 10:37 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-12 12:37 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-17 09:25 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-03-09 21:35 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-10 11:52 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:55 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-10 13:53 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:21 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-10 13:17 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:29 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:17 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-09 16:42 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:19 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-09 12:13 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? "Sam Crean" <sg55443@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 04:58 +1100
Re: Computers anyone? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-03-10 06:37 -0500
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-09 13:39 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-10 01:55 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-03-10 09:43 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-10 14:06 -0600
Re: Computers anyone? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-03-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-11 14:10 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-11 16:21 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 17:04 -0700
Re: Computers anyone? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-12 18:04 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:32 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-03-21 20:17 -0400
Re: Computers anyone? mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-12 19:30 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-09 12:14 -0800
Re: Computers anyone? hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2016-03-12 07:34 +0000
Re: Computers anyone? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-12 07:30 -0700
csiph-web