Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #57487

Re: polyForth multitasker question

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: polyForth multitasker question
Date 2017-04-17 12:13 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2017Apr17.141336@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <Vv6dnYA3-LOtZ23FnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <2017Apr15.184706@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <z8qdnbfkl5j6D2_FnZ2dnUU7-YXNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2017Apr16.182810@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <rvqdnRuRWN8PWG7FnZ2dnUU7-cHNnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>On 4/16/17 6:28 AM, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>>> On 4/15/17 6:47 AM, Anton Ertl wrote:
>>>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>>> Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>> Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>> In fact, it's far less complicated than that. Each task knows how
>>>>>>>>> long it's sleeping, and each time around the round-robin checks to
>>>>>>>>> see if it's wake-up time yet. A very few instructions each time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have 100 tasks waiting in MS,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, this is the wrong way to think about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You probably don't, or at least it's unlikely in a system where most
>>>>>>> tasks are stopped most of the time waiting for some kind of I/O event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you have the same scaling problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not entirely, no: there a substantial difference between stopped tasks
>>>>> and tasks that are woken every time around the round robin.
>>>>
>>>> Makes me wonder why waiting for I/O is optimized in this way, but
>>>> waiting for the timer is not.
>>>
>>> Because you can't set a processor clock to interrupt you 10 seconds and
>>> 5 minutes from now, it ticks at whatever rate it ticks.
>>
>> Even the old C-64 has chips that could be set up to generate
>> interrupts after some time.  Microcontrollers also have such things; I
>> presented the case of the MSP 430 which can set up a clock to wake it
>> up after some time, and it can go to sleep in the mean time (stopping
>> the CPU clock until then).  I am sure other microcontrollers have
>> similiar things.
>
>How many different concurrent timings can you have running on this 
>clock?

One is sufficient (although the C-64 had four 16-bit timers, and each
pair could be combined to a 32-bit timer): You set the timer to the
closest deadline.

> And when one times out, how many instructions does it take to 
>decide which task to wake up?

One option is to tell the interrupt handler which task to wake up when
the timer is set up.  In that case it does not take any instructions
after timeout (but of course, with your implementation of round-robin
and stopped tasks, there is still the time that's needed to go through
all the running and stopped tasks in front of our freshly-woken task,
but at least the tasks in MS are now treated as stopped and are thus
faster).

The rest of the MS code will then have to go through the MS-stopped
tasks, wake the ones whose time has come, find the one with the
closest not-yet-passed time, and set up the timer to interrupt at the
time, and set up the timer interrupt to wake that task.

You can do this with a linear list walk (taking O(n) time), and that
will cost about as much as the round-robin visits to the MS tasks cost
in your system (but it incurs that cost only when an MS task wakes,
not on every PAUSE).  Or you can use a more sophisticated data
structure for better efficiency and scalability.  A well-known one is
the binary heap, where the insertion of a task costs O(ln n), and the
removal of the task with the least timeout is also O(ln n).  Should
take <100 lines of code to implement.

Actually MS cannot be the only word where more tasks are associated
with the same interrupt.  A similar problem must have occured with
BLOCK.  I.e., several tasks wanting to read from disk with BLOCK.  How
was that solved?

>>> Actually, they aren't "visited" in any real sense. There's a jump to the
>>> STATUS cell of the next task. A STOPped task contains a jump to the next
>>> STATUS cell, so the "checking code" is exactly one instruction.
>>
>> That status cell still has to be loaded into the L1 cache.  If you
>> visit 100 such cells on each PAUSE, this means you typically have 100
>> cache lines (6.4KB) consumed for just the PAUSE; if you use jump
>> instructions, you also consume branch predictor resources.
>
>Caches are mostly a contemporary PC thing, (mostly beyond the polyFORTH 
>era). We're mainly talking embedded systems here.

Let's look at an example: the STM32F746ZG is certainly no PC CPU.  It
has an ARM Cortex-M7 MCU with 1 Mbyte Flash, 216 MHz CPU, 320KB RAM,
etc., and it includes 4KB of instruction and 4KB of data cache (with
32-byte cache lines, i.e., our 100 tasks take 3.2KB of the 4KB data
cache).

It certainly is after the polyForth era, but the discussion was not
about whether the design was good for polyForth, but about whether it
is good now.

One answer is the soulful approach of declaring the design good ex
cathedra, and saying "Don't do that" for all cases where it has
disadvantages.  This means that Forth is limited not just to embedded
MCUs, but to slow and very limited MCUs.  As the price of the more
powerful MCUs goes down, the domain of Forth would be smaller and
smaller, and the cost advantage of being able to stay with the smaller
MCU thanks to Forth (and thus the cost advantage of Forth) will become
smaller and smaller.  Actually, it looks to me like that niche has
already vanished, and those people who still program in Forth don't do
it because they absolutely must fit in a small, cheap MCU where it
delivers superior results to other approaches, but for other reasons.
Few, if any, people, are learning Forth because they want to program
slow and very limited MCUs.

Another answer is to recognize that the design does not scale, and be
prepared to provide something more scalable when it is needed.  And in
some cases, one might implement a more scalable approach proactively,
and may then have something that you can use as a marketing argument
for new users, as Erlang did with it's scalable multi-tasking.

>>>> Which multi-user system was that?  VM/CMS?  Or VMS?  Yes, you cannot
>>>> run these systems on an IBM 5150.
>>>
>>> Well, DOS and Windows on PCs.
>>
>> MS-DOS and MS Windows were not multi-user systems.
>
>Exactly. polyFORTH was.

MS-DOS and MS Windows did not use "things like priority queues and
sophisticated schedulers", so Andrew Haley probably did not mean them.

>> Forth was sold as system where you can do a lot with very little
>> hardware.  Worked fine in the early 80s.  Then the hardware got more
>> plentiful, and the herd moved on to programming systems that need more
>> hardware, but offer various conveniences and features.
>>
>> When Forthers are asked about these features and conveniences, many
>> explain that these are not needed and how you can work around their
>> absence; the rest of the world rather stays with the conveniences and
>> features.
>>
>> So Forthers concentrated on microcontrollers, where their
>> little-hardware advantage still gave them an edge, and mostly
>> abandoned the desktop.  But people learn programming on the desktop.
>> They learn Java or C++ or Python, and the distance to C seems not that
>> big.  So when people decide on the programming language for an project
>> on a microcontroller, they often choose C, because it's easier to find
>> C programmers.  So we have, e.g., MISRA-C (which may be what the Bosch
>> programmers are using), but not MISRA-Forth.
>>
>> So what would a selling point on the desktop be?
>
>FORTH, Inc. focuses on the desktop as a development station for embedded 
>applications.

I.e., it's not for most people who learn programming.  Few start their
programming by writing embedded applications.

>> My guess is that the perception is as a thing of the (now-distant)
>> past.  You like to blame poorly-documented hobbyist systems of the
>> 1980s, but these systems are long gone.  How come the professional
>> systems have not been able to overcome that problem?  Could it be that
>> telling potential users that they don't need many of the features that
>> they expect as a matter of course has something to do with it.
>
>I think none of us (companies and users) have made a sufficient effort 
>to tell the story of the advantages Forth has, the positive aspects.

Lots of people talk about advantages.  But when the main advantage is
that you could do things in the 1980s that others could not, and you
ignore all developments since then, focusing on the ever-shrinking
niche of platforms where your approaches from the 1980s are still
doing ok (such as MCUs without caches), most people will quickly lose
interest.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-08 20:53 +1000
  Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-08 12:29 -0500
    Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 09:50 +1000
      Re: polyForth multitasker question David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-09 19:25 -0500
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 10:52 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:58 -0500
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-15 10:39 +1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 11:12 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 18:22 -0700
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 12:17 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-11 03:10 -0500
      Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-09 14:37 -1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:05 -0700
          Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-09 15:50 -1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-10 07:47 +0200
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 12:20 +1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 09:11 +0100
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-10 04:20 -0500
            Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 10:53 +0100
              Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 11:24 +0100
              Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 12:05 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-11 14:27 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-11 07:08 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-11 18:06 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:58 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 13:57 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-12 18:02 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 19:47 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-12 21:22 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 02:57 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-12 23:17 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-13 00:13 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 09:43 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-13 19:34 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 19:57 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:45 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 21:28 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 07:53 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 01:44 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-14 02:01 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:28 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:23 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 22:46 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 11:31 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:23 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 10:06 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-14 08:13 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 14:12 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question pahihu <pahihu@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 09:30 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 08:46 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question pahihu <pahihu@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 13:07 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 18:18 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 13:53 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:34 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 11:31 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 12:14 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:46 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:48 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:50 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 14:39 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 11:48 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-14 22:07 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 16:47 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-15 11:36 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 17:07 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 18:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 06:53 +0300
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 22:00 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:59 +0300
                Re: polyForth multitasker question lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 22:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 17:26 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-16 09:10 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 09:13 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-16 16:28 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 09:27 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-16 14:45 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 17:50 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 12:13 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-17 13:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 03:49 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-18 13:47 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 14:30 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-16 20:58 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-18 11:47 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-17 19:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 04:34 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-19 02:00 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 18:10 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-19 01:41 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 21:38 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-19 10:56 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-19 07:22 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-17 20:10 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2017-04-18 09:35 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-18 08:01 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 09:03 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-18 11:07 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-18 10:59 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 19:13 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:36 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-16 16:27 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:32 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 10:15 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 13:07 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 15:13 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 01:36 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 22:48 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:36 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 14:55 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 15:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-14 23:45 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-16 21:13 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-17 16:57 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-17 20:08 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 15:34 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 19:43 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 23:03 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 23:50 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 03:55 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 01:38 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 11:50 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question john <anon@example.com> - 2017-04-15 12:03 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 12:41 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 12:14 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:32 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 20:41 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 14:57 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 20:45 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 23:56 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 14:32 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 12:05 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-15 04:10 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 03:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-13 15:46 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 11:37 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 09:48 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-13 05:37 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-11 22:12 -0700
                Multitasking with Forth processors Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 07:39 +0200
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:58 -0700
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 03:00 -0400
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-12 12:18 +0200
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:11 -0400
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 13:50 -0700
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-12 13:30 -1000
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-04-14 12:20 +0100
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:47 -0400
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-10 07:42 -1000

csiph-web