Re: polyForth multitasker question

From	anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: polyForth multitasker question
Date	2017-04-16 16:28 +0000
Organization	Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID	<2017Apr16.182810@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <uPednfe7K92eVm3FnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2017Apr14.161245@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <Vv6dnYA3-LOtZ23FnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <2017Apr15.184706@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <z8qdnbfkl5j6D2_FnZ2dnUU7-YXNnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>On 4/15/17 6:47 AM, Anton Ertl wrote:
>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>> Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>> Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes:
>>>>> Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>>> "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes:
>>>>>>> In fact, it's far less complicated than that. Each task knows how
>>>>>>> long it's sleeping, and each time around the round-robin checks to
>>>>>>> see if it's wake-up time yet. A very few instructions each time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have 100 tasks waiting in MS,
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, this is the wrong way to think about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You probably don't, or at least it's unlikely in a system where most
>>>>> tasks are stopped most of the time waiting for some kind of I/O event.
>>>>
>>>> Then you have the same scaling problem.
>>>
>>> Not entirely, no: there a substantial difference between stopped tasks
>>> and tasks that are woken every time around the round robin.
>>
>> Makes me wonder why waiting for I/O is optimized in this way, but
>> waiting for the timer is not.
>
>Because you can't set a processor clock to interrupt you 10 seconds and 
>5 minutes from now, it ticks at whatever rate it ticks.

Even the old C-64 has chips that could be set up to generate
interrupts after some time.  Microcontrollers also have such things; I
presented the case of the MSP 430 which can set up a clock to wake it
up after some time, and it can go to sleep in the mean time (stopping
the CPU clock until then).  I am sure other microcontrollers have
similiar things.

> All you can do 
>is count the ticks in a very short interrupt routine, and a task that is 
>waiting can look at the current tick count. A keyboard, on the other 
>hand, can be ignored except when someone presses a key.

The situation is just the same: The timer or the keyboard generates an
interrupt, and the interrupt handler (in an accordingly designed
system) can wake up the corresponding tasks.

>> And of course, because all the stopped tasks are still visited when
>> there is a PAUSE, you incur the cache accesses (and cache evictions)
>> that I mentioned earlier.  It will not incur the cost of executing the
>> checking code (and avoid the I-cache cost associated with that), but
>> whether these savings are substantial is in the eye of the beholder.
>
>Actually, they aren't "visited" in any real sense. There's a jump to the 
>STATUS cell of the next task. A STOPped task contains a jump to the next 
>STATUS cell, so the "checking code" is exactly one instruction.

That status cell still has to be loaded into the L1 cache.  If you
visit 100 such cells on each PAUSE, this means you typically have 100
cache lines (6.4KB) consumed for just the PAUSE; if you use jump
instructions, you also consume branch predictor resources.

>Wakeup is typically 
>half-dozen instructions.

If you really rewrite jump instructions, it costs at least a cache
line flush and I-cache line load, which can be quite expensive; it
only happens on STOP and wakeup, so that should not be so bad.

>> Which multi-user system was that?  VM/CMS?  Or VMS?  Yes, you cannot
>> run these systems on an IBM 5150.
>
>Well, DOS and Windows on PCs.

MS-DOS and MS Windows were not multi-user systems.

>> Doing the MS optimizations discussed here would certainly be possible
>> on an IBM PC, but with 256KB max (i.e., a few hundred tasks at the
>> most) at least the O(n log(n)) implementation of looking up the next
>> task to be woken would probably be overkill.  You probably don't want
>> to do concurrency-oriented programming with that little RAM, so you
>> don't need the scalability.
>
>The upper limit of tasks on a native Forth has always been how many the 
>application needed, not hardware or timing resources. A task can be as 
>small as 100 bytes or so.

Sure, but if these tasks are to do something useful, they need a
little more, that's how I computed my estimate.

>> But even these few dozen probably don't program in
>> Forth, because Forth is not widespread enough.  And the unbalanced
>> minimization dogmas have something to do with that.  Or in other
>> words: If you give up the desktop, you also give up a large part of
>> the tiny computers.
>
>I'm not sure that "unbalanced minimization dogmas" have anything 
>whatever to do with Forth's popularity. Forth suffers because there 
>isn't any publicity given to its successes and availability.

Forth had good publicity in the 1980s.  That's how I learned about
Forth.  Why is there no longer any publicity?

Forth was sold as system where you can do a lot with very little
hardware.  Worked fine in the early 80s.  Then the hardware got more
plentiful, and the herd moved on to programming systems that need more
hardware, but offer various conveniences and features.

When Forthers are asked about these features and conveniences, many
explain that these are not needed and how you can work around their
absence; the rest of the world rather stays with the conveniences and
features.

So Forthers concentrated on microcontrollers, where their
little-hardware advantage still gave them an edge, and mostly
abandoned the desktop.  But people learn programming on the desktop.
They learn Java or C++ or Python, and the distance to C seems not that
big.  So when people decide on the programming language for an project
on a microcontroller, they often choose C, because it's easier to find
C programmers.  So we have, e.g., MISRA-C (which may be what the Bosch
programmers are using), but not MISRA-Forth.

So what would a selling point on the desktop be?

Introspection?  Forth used to have an edge there, but others have
caught up, while Forth has mostly abandoned this advantage.

Multi-tasking?  Forth cannot do anything extraordinary on todays
desktops.  Erlang can, and that's why it has more publicity (not
sure how that translates into users).

Associative arrays?  Gforth has them (TABLE), so at least Gforth does
not lack this common feature of many popular languages, but that still
does make it stand out among those languages.

etc.

And for any such features, when somebody discusses them, we get
explanations that these features are not needed, that customers have
not asked for them, or if they have asked for them, they got the right
answer: do it yourself, because that's much better and much more
efficient, and you get a cleaner and neater system, and it builds
character.  That may all be true, but it does not attract new users.

Of course, here again we have the problem of finding a good balance.
If we want to have Python or Erlang features, one might just as well
switch to Python or Erlang.  There are certainly Forth qualities we
want to keep.  The point I want to make is that minimalism alone leads
us to a dead end; we have to take a more balanced approach.

>The problem is not that the "rest of the world" doesn't like what we're 
>doing, it's because they don't know about it except a faint perception 
>that it's a hobbyist toy.

My guess is that the perception is as a thing of the (now-distant)
past.  You like to blame poorly-documented hobbyist systems of the
1980s, but these systems are long gone.  How come the professional
systems have not been able to overcome that problem?  Could it be that
telling potential users that they don't need many of the features that
they expect as a matter of course has something to do with it.

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2016: http://www.euroforth.org/ef16/

Thread

polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-08 20:53 +1000
  Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-08 12:29 -0500
    Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 09:50 +1000
      Re: polyForth multitasker question David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-09 19:25 -0500
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 10:52 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:58 -0500
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-15 10:39 +1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 11:12 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 18:22 -0700
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 12:17 +1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-11 03:10 -0500
      Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-09 14:37 -1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:05 -0700
          Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-09 15:50 -1000
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-10 07:47 +0200
        Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 12:20 +1000
        Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 09:11 +0100
          Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-10 04:20 -0500
            Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 10:53 +0100
              Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-10 11:24 +0100
              Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-11 12:05 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-11 14:27 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-11 07:08 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-11 18:06 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 18:58 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 13:57 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-12 18:02 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 19:47 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-12 21:22 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 02:57 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-12 23:17 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-13 00:13 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 09:43 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-13 19:34 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 19:57 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:45 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 21:28 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 07:53 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 01:44 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-14 02:01 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:28 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:23 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 22:46 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 11:31 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:23 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 10:06 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-14 08:13 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-14 14:12 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question pahihu <pahihu@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 09:30 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 08:46 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question pahihu <pahihu@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 13:07 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 18:18 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 13:53 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:34 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 11:31 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 12:14 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:46 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:48 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 12:50 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 14:39 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 11:48 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-14 22:07 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 16:47 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-15 11:36 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 17:07 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 18:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 06:53 +0300
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 22:00 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:59 +0300
                Re: polyForth multitasker question lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 22:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 17:26 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-16 09:10 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 09:13 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-16 16:28 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 09:27 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-16 14:45 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-16 17:50 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 12:13 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-17 13:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 03:49 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-18 13:47 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 14:30 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-16 20:58 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-18 11:47 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-17 19:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-18 04:34 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-19 02:00 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 18:10 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-19 01:41 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 21:38 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-19 10:56 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-19 07:22 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-17 20:10 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question stephen@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2017-04-18 09:35 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-18 08:01 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 09:03 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-18 11:07 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-18 10:59 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-19 19:13 +1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:36 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-16 16:27 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:32 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 10:15 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 13:07 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 15:13 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 01:36 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 22:48 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:36 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 14:55 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 15:27 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-14 23:45 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-16 21:13 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-17 16:57 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-17 20:08 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-14 15:34 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 19:43 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 23:03 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 23:50 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 03:55 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 01:38 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 11:50 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question john <anon@example.com> - 2017-04-15 12:03 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-15 12:41 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 12:14 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:32 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 20:41 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2017-04-17 14:57 +0000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 20:45 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 23:56 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-15 14:32 +0200
                Re: polyForth multitasker question rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 12:05 -0400
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-15 04:10 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 03:19 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-13 15:46 +0100
                Re: polyForth multitasker question foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-14 11:37 -0700
                Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-13 09:48 -1000
                Re: polyForth multitasker question Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-13 05:37 -0500
                Re: polyForth multitasker question minforth@arcor.de - 2017-04-11 22:12 -0700
                Multitasking with Forth processors Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2017-04-12 07:39 +0200
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:58 -0700
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 03:00 -0400
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-04-12 12:18 +0200
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:11 -0400
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-12 13:50 -0700
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-12 13:30 -1000
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-04-14 12:20 +0100
                Re: Multitasking with Forth processors rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 16:47 -0400
            Re: polyForth multitasker question "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-10 07:42 -1000

csiph-web