Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373560
| From | Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A Particle Model of Light |
| Date | 2016-01-08 18:45 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20160108184547.9b6ac1980e6e28c3615f425a@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <ab87c7a1-c164-42e8-ab50-6f9b2f340815@googlegroups.com> <20160107154119.4f15804272804455c78dc2a6@gmail.com> <0da92afa-0692-4234-95f3-f19464523787@googlegroups.com> <20160107210002.867f05e3cd00931e9c6c6ba8@gmail.com> <e560fe32-b449-4bdf-aae1-cff9733df27e@googlegroups.com> |
John Heath to Anton Shepelev:
> > Gary Harnagel:
> >
> > > How else can S have gotten a number three
> > > times bigger than Michelson was able to detect
> > > and even larger than the detection limits of
> > > other experiments?
> >
> > I have already said how -- by conducting the ex-
> > periment in the near space, where the ether is
> > less entrained by the Earth and its atmospere.
>
> Your point of the difference between near and far
> aether entrainment is worth consideration.
Dayton Miller was probably the first to make the ob-
servation, but it was ignored by the majority of
those who made later "repetitions" with predictably
negative outcomes.
> Also the transverse leg of the M&M experiment is
> in question as it is tracking c2=(c^2-v^2)/2 ->
I don't know German, but think you have mistyped
Feist's equation:
Ch = (c^2 - v^2)/c
> -> according to measurements made by Norbert Feist
> with audio in a wind tunnel.
I can't read that paper and can't comment on the re-
sults of his measurements. How does he derive his
formula for the tranverse speed and what error does
he see in the standard derivation of
Ctr = sqrt(c^2 - v^2)
from the velocity triangle? Why is the situation
not equivalent to a boats's crossing a river?
> Norbert Feist can be found at
> http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/norbertfeist.html
That's not Fiest, but Bruhn refuting Feist, and in
my opinion Bruhn is correct.
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 14:49 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 04:38 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-26 15:06 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 21:57 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-26 13:17 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-27 12:15 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 15:40 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-27 12:41 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 20:11 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-27 14:32 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:05 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-02 16:24 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-03 12:57 -0600
Re: A Particle Model of Light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 13:26 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 13:13 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 13:21 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-03 12:26 -0600
Re: A Particle Model of Light Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-03 18:48 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-04 05:29 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 20:19 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-05 11:15 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 01:03 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-05 17:28 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 15:41 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-07 05:02 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 21:00 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 01:04 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 18:45 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 08:33 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-08 20:50 -0800
Re: A Particle Model of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-05 19:50 -0600
Re: A Particle Model of Light Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-06 15:33 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-06 12:40 -0600
Re: A Particle Model of Light Kathleen Winder <katwin@mcgatlin.org> - 2016-01-07 22:27 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 19:15 +0300
Re: A Particle Model of Light Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-09 14:00 +0000
Re: A Particle Model of Light Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-09 14:02 +0000
csiph-web