Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14568
| Message-ID | <1598151.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: GET vs POST in AJAX |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (5 earlier) <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de> <jrolbr$cfe$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Stefan Weiss wrote: > On 2012-06-18 20:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Stefan Weiss wrote: >>> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a >>> typical case of fair use. >> AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only. > > This is getting pretty far off-topic, and IANAL, but... The Internet > Society (who holds the copyright on that RFC), Daniel Pitts, and his > Usenet provider are all based in the US. Which law do you think would > apply in this case? I do not know. I think it is a legal grey area. > (This is assuming the purely hypothetical case of a complaint or suit by > an organization whose mission is "to assure the open development, > evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people > throughout the world".) My point exactly. >> I do not think it even applies here. > > […] > Or did "here" mean a different physical location, such as Germany or > Austria? Of course not. > That's a whole different ball of wax, because neither Copyright > nor Fair Use exist there. They have Urheberrecht, Zitatrecht and > Verwertungsrechte instead. Even so, short non-commercial quotations are > explicitly permitted in both countries. Please tell me something I do not know yet. PointedEars -- > If you get a bunch of authors […] that state the same "best practices" > in any programming language, then you can bet who is wrong or right... Not with javascript. Nonsense propagates like wildfire in this field. -- Richard Cornford, comp.lang.javascript, 2011-11-14
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200
csiph-web