Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14568

Re: GET vs POST in AJAX

Message-ID <1598151.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
Subject Re: GET vs POST in AJAX
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References (5 earlier) <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de> <jrolbr$cfe$1@news.albasani.net>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw


Stefan Weiss wrote:

> On 2012-06-18 20:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>>> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a
>>> typical case of fair use.
>> AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only.
> 
> This is getting pretty far off-topic, and IANAL, but... The Internet
> Society (who holds the copyright on that RFC), Daniel Pitts, and his
> Usenet provider are all based in the US. Which law do you think would
> apply in this case?

I do not know.  I think it is a legal grey area.

> (This is assuming the purely hypothetical case of a complaint or suit by
> an organization whose mission is "to assure the open development,
> evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people
> throughout the world".)

My point exactly.
 
>> I do not think it even applies here.
> 
> […]
> Or did "here" mean a different physical location, such as Germany or
> Austria?

Of course not.

> That's a whole different ball of wax, because neither Copyright
> nor Fair Use exist there. They have Urheberrecht, Zitatrecht and
> Verwertungsrechte instead. Even so, short non-commercial quotations are
> explicitly permitted in both countries.

Please tell me something I do not know yet.


PointedEars
-- 
> If you get a bunch of authors […] that state the same "best practices"
> in any programming language, then you can bet who is wrong or right...
Not with javascript. Nonsense propagates like wildfire in this field.
  -- Richard Cornford, comp.lang.javascript, 2011-11-14

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
      Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
        Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
          Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
            Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200

csiph-web