Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14568

Re: GET vs POST in AJAX

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.karotte.org!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-ID <1598151.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:19:45 +0200
User-Agent KNode/4.4.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8Bit
X-Face %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face 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
Subject Re: GET vs POST in AJAX
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <bcc85577-4540-4c88-8c4a-4fd9492c6f89@googlegroups.com> <jrhpod$g06$1@news.albasani.net> <z15Dr.17851$FV6.10884@newsfe05.iad> <jriogu$4um$1@news.albasani.net> <KZ5Dr.15185$ji7.2529@newsfe20.iad> <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de> <jrolbr$cfe$1@news.albasani.net>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript
MIME-Version 1.0
Lines 44
NNTP-Posting-Date 19 Jun 2012 19:19:55 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host 78aea594.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace DXC=21Zi3amgadhm7>ihJR;B_cic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRankgeX?EC@@`IRTKiQcV`1dDZm8W4\YJNlJ`:FmdeL>K`6JDa4d]ka`e``XT>X:nM8d
X-Complaints-To usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:14568

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show key headers only | View raw

Stefan Weiss wrote:

> On 2012-06-18 20:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>>> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a
>>> typical case of fair use.
>> AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only.
> 
> This is getting pretty far off-topic, and IANAL, but... The Internet
> Society (who holds the copyright on that RFC), Daniel Pitts, and his
> Usenet provider are all based in the US. Which law do you think would
> apply in this case?

I do not know.  I think it is a legal grey area.

> (This is assuming the purely hypothetical case of a complaint or suit by
> an organization whose mission is "to assure the open development,
> evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people
> throughout the world".)

My point exactly.
 
>> I do not think it even applies here.
> 
> […]
> Or did "here" mean a different physical location, such as Germany or
> Austria?

Of course not.

> That's a whole different ball of wax, because neither Copyright
> nor Fair Use exist there. They have Urheberrecht, Zitatrecht and
> Verwertungsrechte instead. Even so, short non-commercial quotations are
> explicitly permitted in both countries.

Please tell me something I do not know yet.


PointedEars
-- 
> If you get a bunch of authors […] that state the same "best practices"
> in any programming language, then you can bet who is wrong or right...
Not with javascript. Nonsense propagates like wildfire in this field.
  -- Richard Cornford, comp.lang.javascript, 2011-11-14

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
      Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
        Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
          Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
            Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200

csiph-web