Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14553

Re: GET vs POST in AJAX

From Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: GET vs POST in AJAX
Date 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <jrolbr$cfe$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <KZ5Dr.15185$ji7.2529@newsfe20.iad> <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2012-06-18 20:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Stefan Weiss wrote:
>> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a
>> typical case of fair use.
> 
> AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only.

This is getting pretty far off-topic, and IANAL, but... The Internet
Society (who holds the copyright on that RFC), Daniel Pitts, and his
Usenet provider are all based in the US. Which law do you think would
apply in this case?

(This is assuming the purely hypothetical case of a complaint or suit by
an organization whose mission is "to assure the open development,
evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people
throughout the world".)

> I do not think it even applies here.

Again, IANAL, but from everything I've read, I'm pretty certain that
Fair Use does apply to a short quotation from a freely available
standard in a discussion group:

| […] the fair use of a copyrighted work […] for purposes such as
| criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple
| copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an
| infringement of copyright.

Or did "here" mean a different physical location, such as Germany or
Austria? That's a whole different ball of wax, because neither Copyright
nor Fair Use exist there. They have Urheberrecht, Zitatrecht and
Verwertungsrechte instead. Even so, short non-commercial quotations are
explicitly permitted in both countries.

- stefan

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
      Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
        Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
          Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
            Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200

csiph-web