Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14543
| Message-ID | <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: GET vs POST in AJAX |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <bcc85577-4540-4c88-8c4a-4fd9492c6f89@googlegroups.com> <jrhpod$g06$1@news.albasani.net> <z15Dr.17851$FV6.10884@newsfe05.iad> <jriogu$4um$1@news.albasani.net> <KZ5Dr.15185$ji7.2529@newsfe20.iad> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Daniel Pitts wrote: > On 6/16/12 12:58 PM, Stefan Weiss wrote: >> On 2012-06-16 21:22, Daniel Pitts wrote: >>> On 6/16/12 4:13 AM, Stefan Weiss wrote: >>>> As you say, the difference is mostly semantic. In a nutshell, >>>> - GET retrieves information from the server. It should not have any >>>> other side effects changing the state on the server, or at least the >>>> client may assume that the request is "safe". >> >>> Actually, I recall reading somewhere that "GET" need only be idempotent. >>> The first call is allowed to change server state, but calling it over >>> and over again will have no further effect. >> >> I've never heard that before. It would be be interesting to know where >> you read that. > I don't remember where I first read that, but here is a top result for > the Google search "get method idempotent" > > <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html> This is Usenet. Please do not only post URLs of resources which you *think* support your position (for the dedicated reader to switch medium to find out whether it really does), but *make an argument* using the resource as reference (best by citing it *and* quoting the relevant parts). Refer to Stefan's posting for a good example how that can be done. PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200
csiph-web