Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14577

Re: GET vs POST in AJAX

From Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: GET vs POST in AJAX
Date 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
Organization Home
Message-ID <79Ax2qIbaN4PFwSK@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <KZ5Dr.15185$ji7.2529@newsfe20.iad> <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.lang.javascript message <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de>,
Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:17:47, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> posted:

>Stefan Weiss wrote:
>
>> On 2012-06-18 05:57, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>> Also, I'd rather not worry about copyright infringement.
>>
>> Copyright violations on Usenet? Who would have thought...
>> I think it's safe to say that copyright holders are more concerned with
>> the alt.binaries hierarchies than comp.lang.
>>
>> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a
>> typical case of fair use.
>
>AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only.  I do not think it even
>applies here.

Naive.  Consult the obvious references, including
<http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urheberrecht#Art_und_Umfang_des_Urheberrec
hts>.

RBTD.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v6.05   MIME.
   Web  <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.
 Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036)
 Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
  Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
    Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
      Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
        Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
          Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
            Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
                Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
              Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200

csiph-web