Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #14577
| From | Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: GET vs POST in AJAX |
| Date | 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100 |
| Organization | Home |
| Message-ID | <79Ax2qIbaN4PFwSK@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <KZ5Dr.15185$ji7.2529@newsfe20.iad> <1598106.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <HGxDr.38753$PF1.5901@newsfe15.iad> <jrna3s$tlj$1@news.albasani.net> <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de> |
In comp.lang.javascript message <3559212.dG70XP5YAQ@PointedEars.de>, Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:17:47, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> posted: >Stefan Weiss wrote: > >> On 2012-06-18 05:57, Daniel Pitts wrote: >>> Also, I'd rather not worry about copyright infringement. >> >> Copyright violations on Usenet? Who would have thought... >> I think it's safe to say that copyright holders are more concerned with >> the alt.binaries hierarchies than comp.lang. >> >> Quoting small excerpts from a technical document in a discussion is a >> typical case of fair use. > >AFAIK, "Fair use" is a concept of U.S. law only. I do not think it even >applies here. Naive. Consult the obvious references, including <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urheberrecht#Art_und_Umfang_des_Urheberrec hts>. RBTD. -- (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Proper <= 4-line sig. separator as above, a line exactly "-- " (SonOfRFC1036) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with ">" or "> " (SonOfRFC1036)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 18:16 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:31 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX CODEY <ed.pataky@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 15:43 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Jason C <jwcarlton@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 21:14 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 13:13 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 12:22 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 21:58 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-16 13:26 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-17 09:06 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-17 20:57 -0700
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:23 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:17 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 03:41 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-19 12:25 +1000
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-19 19:19 +0200
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Dr J R Stockton <reply1225@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-06-19 20:44 +0100
Re: GET vs POST in AJAX Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-18 20:14 +0200
csiph-web