Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534639
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: long antenna |
| Date | Sun, 22 Nov 2015 23:16:22 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 131 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <6vu9ic-bgi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d82a6d99-39d1-4eb7-9aa0-4ed38641537a@googlegroups.com> <n2fsm5$ms8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4736856.kWDMch3Bm0@PointedEars.de> <n2ivpn$gh9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <fddvhc-vob.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n2jcuf$9qr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2a30ic-rud.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n2knqi$4vu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <0th1ic-34j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n2tc8f$9h$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="8822"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OoQHd1ZVwFd0kKHLOS8AI" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7q3GeSN/hBswhN2I2RHswmbesuo= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:534639 |
Show key headers only | View raw
gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: > On 11/19/2015 12:44 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: >>> On 11/18/2015 11:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/18/2015 5:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/18/2015 3:56 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > <snip> > >>>>> one can use an antenna with a preamp and forget matching, however the >>>>> preamp will be a mixer, with the LO supplied by FM, TV stations or other >>>>> if around, providing inteference. >>>> >>>> Total nonnsense. >>> >>> not at all, the typical tradeoff in designing preamps, how much gain, in >>> how much selectivity (bandwidth), how much NF. >>> Typical in the below 30MHz RF preamps is no antenna matching, other >>> factors dominate. >> >> Nope. > > have to match transmitter, below 30 MHz receiver preamps not much need > at all. Preamps have nothing to do with transmitters. A switchable preamp is very handy; switch in it when signal levels are low and out when there are strong signals that would cause overload. >>>> >>>> Mixing requires a non-linear device and preamps are built to be linear >>>> devices. >>> >>> preamps are linear only in a range, outside this range all preamps are >>> mixers. And even in their linear range, they also provide gain to other >>> signals in their bandwidth, which also cause following stages to be over >>> driven, to become mixers. >> >> Arm waving. > > this is stuff experienced RF designers know, not the Hams, or amateur > radio people what is left of them. This is very basic RF that you can find in the Radio Amateurs Handbook. I suggest you read it. >>> >>> If you put a +20dB preamp on your FM radio, it will trash it out totally. >> >> This just shows you haven't a clue why one would use a preamp. >> > > so you are recommending using +20dB preamp for FM radios ? No, I am saying you don't know what you are talking about. >>>> Matchins still important to preamps. >>> >>> and so is intentional mis-matching, important to provide stability, and >>> loading for front end filters, and finding best NF, a tradeoff >>> typically. Depends on the band and application. >> >> Nope. > > well, that is RF design, not amateur radio sandbox tinkering. Nope, it is babbling word salad. >>>> >>>> Most of that is just nonsense. >>> >>> I see you are unfamiliar with FM radio. >>> "Capture" is also closely related to "takeover gain" >>> That is why FM sounds so much better than AM. >> >> Nope. >> >> Clueless. >> >> FYI, FM sounds better than AM (for broadcast) because the allowed bandwidth >> is much higher. It has little to nothing to do with the modulation other >> than FM is static resistant. > > Why is FM "static resistant" ? Capture effect. Nope, it is because static is primarily AM. > Guess you should take some time and refresh yourself. Guess you still haven't a clue what you are talking about. >> >>> https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/fm-modulation-capture-effect.747206/ >>> >>>> >>>>> he said he was listening to FM, so he is in a city, >>>> >>>> There are lots of FM stations outside major cities these days. >>> >>>>> but break out your spectrum analyser and see how huge the FM station >>>>> power is, larger than any other, except for some TV channels >>>>> >>>>> I would do it and send a photo, but my analyser when last turned on, let >>>>> out some smoke in the back, and no workie now. (smoked a resistor in the >>>>> power section somewhere) >>>> >>>> >>>> Not surprising given your level of RF knowledge. >>> >>> no it is a nice but older 10KHz to 22GHz Unit, easy to fix smoked >>> resistor, but a 100#der almost a boat anker. >>> but Troll on if you must, but you could contribute too. >> >> OK. >> >> Go buy a copy of the Radio Amateurs Handbook and read it. >> > > that is for Amateurs, 1960's stuff, and didn't they quit printing that > a while back ? Nope, it is kept up to date and is far above your demonstrated technical level. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
long antenna RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-17 10:42 -0800
Re: long antenna Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 12:46 -0600
Re: long antenna Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 20:10 +0100
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 20:28 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 16:59 -0500
Re: long antenna Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-18 22:56 +0100
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-18 16:57 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 23:15 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-18 20:42 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 05:29 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-19 08:54 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 18:44 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-22 15:32 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 23:16 +0000
Re: long antenna HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 06:59 -0800
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 20:02 -0500
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 01:36 -0500
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-17 13:28 -0600
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 14:04 -0800
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 22:35 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 19:28 -0500
Re: long antenna Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-11-17 17:18 -0800
Re: long antenna RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 11:39 -0800
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:12 -0500
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:21 -0600
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 10:05 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 20:05 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:39 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:46 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 19:55 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 20:04 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:33 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 22:58 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:11 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 19:42 +0000
Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 11:57 -0800
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 14:52 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 21:12 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:58 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:37 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:45 -0500
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-27 01:01 -0600
Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:31 -0800
Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:34 -0500
Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:58 -0800
Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:46 -0500
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-28 16:42 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 22:58 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 07:46 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 19:01 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 14:12 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 20:43 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 17:41 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 00:15 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 20:23 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 06:21 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 15:22 -0500
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 20:48 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 17:16 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 23:52 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 19:59 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 02:16 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 19:20 -0500
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 18:53 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 00:08 -0500
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-25 06:13 +0000
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 16:25 -0800
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 16:08 -0800
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 00:40 +0000
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 15:51 -0800
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 00:34 +0000
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-21 14:37 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 19:32 +0000
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-22 14:50 +0000
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 11:27 -0800
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:44 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:40 +0000
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-23 14:13 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 13:00 -0500
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-24 13:20 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:40 -0500
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-25 13:44 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 18:47 +0000
Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-24 13:20 +0000
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 19:49 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:36 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 23:00 +0000
Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 16:17 -0600
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 23:35 +0000
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 20:58 -0500
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 20:09 -0500
Re: long antenna "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:51 -0800
Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 00:01 -0500
Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 15:36 -0800
Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-25 23:51 +0000
csiph-web