Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #536531

Re: long antenna

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: long antenna
Date 2015-11-30 19:01 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <s0juic-u98.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <n38v4p$jf2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <NN%5y.199808$sK.13157@fx14.iad> <n3dala$v0i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <16opic-5al.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n3hjv2$kku$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2015 4:58 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/27/2015 10:46 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 11/27/2015 02:01 AM, gilber34 wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2015 10:45 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2015 08:37 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> perhaps not gamma ray, but you DO know that X-ray parabolic antennas
>>>> exist, right?
>>>
>>> using glancing, paraboioids and hyperboioids, not quite the same as a
>>> dish.  but my point was to counter the over generalization that EM
>>> frequency being the same.  Still waiting on the size of the 60 HZ dish
>>> for 20 dB gain...
>>
>> Pretty large, but the physical size is irrelevant; the gain of a dish
>> is a function of it's diameter in wavelengths, so the gain of a 3 lambda
>> 60 Hz dish is the same as the gain of a 3 lambda 60 GHz dish.
> 
> as usual, WRONG.

Nope.

Then why do antenna books have nomographs of dB gain verssus physical
size with straight lines for frequency.

> the 60Hz dish would be 17,794,063.6 meters wide or 11,056 miles wide or 
> 100 times the diameter of the Earth. Impossable to build it at all.

Not in space given enough time and money.

> THE PHYSICAL SIZE IS THE ISSUE !

Nope.

Physical size only determines the econonomic practicably, not the RF
characteristics.

> (what size waveguide do you feed a 60 Hz dish with ?)

You assume due to your utter ignorance of antennas and RF in general
that all dishes are fed with waveguide; they are not. It is very
common to feed dishes in the lower microwave region and below with
coax.

> your max surface roughness at 60GHz is what ?

It is perfect because competant people were used to build it and
irrelevant to the fact that antennas scale in frequency.

> How much beam taper do you illuminate the edges with to avoid backlobes 
> at 60GHz? which would pick up the 60HZ earth very well. What would the 
> F/B ratio be to pick up a 60Hz craft 1,000,000,000 miles out ?

The same as at 60 GHz.

>> The only issue with a dish at gamma or X-ray frquencies is that the
>> dish has to be made of a material that is reflective at those frequencies,
> 
> which there are not any for a parabolic dish.

Which is irrelevant to the fact that antennas scale in frequency.

If you can find a material that is relective at gamma or X-ray frquencies,
then such a dish will perform just the same as any other dish at any
other frequency with the same diameter in wavelengths.

> what is the max surface roughness you could have ? (hint: 1/4 lamda and 
> how much is that?) can anybody do that yet ?
> so you are WRONG again, find the answer in ARRL, not.

The requirements would be the same as any other dish at any other frequency
with the same diameter in wavelengths.

The thing you are utterly unable to understand is that electromagnetic
theory of antennas is frequency independant.

The practical ability to construct a given antenna may change with
frequency, but the electromagnetic theory does NOT.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

long antenna RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-17 10:42 -0800
  Re: long antenna Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 12:46 -0600
    Re: long antenna Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 20:10 +0100
    Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 20:28 +0000
      Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 16:59 -0500
    Re: long antenna Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-11-18 22:56 +0100
      Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-18 16:57 -0600
        Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-18 23:15 +0000
          Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-18 20:42 -0600
            Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 05:29 +0000
              Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-19 08:54 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 18:44 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-22 15:32 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 23:16 +0000
            Re: long antenna HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 06:59 -0800
              Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 20:02 -0500
      Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 01:36 -0500
  Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-17 13:28 -0600
  Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 14:04 -0800
    Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-17 22:35 +0000
      Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 19:28 -0500
        Re: long antenna Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-11-17 17:18 -0800
          Re: long antenna RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-24 11:39 -0800
            Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:12 -0500
              Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:21 -0600
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 10:05 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 20:05 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:39 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:46 +0000
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 19:55 +0000
            Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 20:04 +0000
              Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:33 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 22:58 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:11 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 19:42 +0000
                Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 11:57 -0800
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 14:52 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 21:12 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:58 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 01:37 +0000
                Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:45 -0500
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-27 01:01 -0600
                Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 23:31 -0800
                Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:34 -0500
                Re: long antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:58 -0800
                Re: long antenna benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:46 -0500
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-28 16:42 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-28 22:58 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 07:46 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 19:01 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 14:12 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 20:43 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 17:41 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 00:15 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 20:23 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 06:21 +0000
                Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 15:22 -0500
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 20:48 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 17:16 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-30 23:52 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-30 19:59 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-01 02:16 +0000
                Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 19:20 -0500
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 18:53 +0000
              Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 00:08 -0500
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-25 06:13 +0000
  Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 16:25 -0800
  Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 16:08 -0800
    Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 00:40 +0000
      Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 15:51 -0800
        Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 00:34 +0000
          Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-21 14:37 +0000
            Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 19:32 +0000
              Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-22 14:50 +0000
                Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 11:27 -0800
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:44 +0000
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:40 +0000
                Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-23 14:13 +0000
                Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 13:00 -0500
                Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-24 13:20 +0000
                Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 13:40 -0500
                Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-25 13:44 +0000
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 18:47 +0000
                Re: long antenna jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-24 13:20 +0000
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 19:49 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-24 16:36 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-24 23:00 +0000
                Re: long antenna gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 16:17 -0600
                Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-26 23:35 +0000
        Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 20:58 -0500
    Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 20:09 -0500
  Re: long antenna "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 12:51 -0800
    Re: long antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 00:01 -0500
  Re: long antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 15:36 -0800
    Re: long antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-25 23:51 +0000

csiph-web