Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463366

Re: sci.physics.relativity

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: sci.physics.relativity
Date	2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<5B3BE0FB.48BA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <6790ebac-fc05-4bb0-b9ec-89d51cfe403e@googlegroups.com> <29b47fcf-f2c7-4437-9460-66b6285ce173@googlegroups.com> <5B37DEBD.B95@ix.netcom.com> <2f5a6585-620d-46b4-9fc2-18618018c67b@googlegroups.com> <5B3B1D87.33A6@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> JanPB wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 12:48:36 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > JanPB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 4:55:35 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 3:36:21 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 10:09:22 AM UTC-4, tjrob137 wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 6/27/18 8:22 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > > > > > > > > SolomonW wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> Newton and Newtonian physics are not quite the same thing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > First of all, that is nonsense.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > No, it is true, fundamentally.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Newton thought that space and time are "absolute". Today, we know that
> > > > > > > > absolute space and time are irrelevant, because all of the Newtonian
> > > > > > > > laws of physics are valid in any inertial frame (not just a single
> > > > > > > > "absolute" frame).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So for the past century (at least), Newton's "absolute space and time"
> > > > > > > > have had no effect on any modeling using Newtonian physics. IOW: they
> > > > > > > > are just words with no impact.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thatâ€™s not truth. Absolute time is use to synch the GPS clock with the ground clock by redefining the GPS second to have 4,4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. [etc. etc.]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Absolute time is not used anywhere in physics today. You probably meant
> > > > > > some kind of "time by convention".
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Assertion is not a valid argument.
> > > >
> > > > Regardless, I _assert_, based on my expertise in the field, that absolute
> > > > time is NOT used anywhere in physics today.
> > > >
> > > > That's how it is, end of story.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jan
> > >
> > >
> > > Not end of story...yous people are simply afraid of 'absolute time' because yous simply don't understand it.
> >
> > Nonsense.
> >
> > --
> > Jan
> 
> 'The more things change, the more they remain the same.'
> 
> 
> 
> Aristole - The more things change...
> 
> Newton - the more they remain the same.


(i knows yous people don't understand short sentences...)

Aristole believed Time is change...

and Newton believed Time flows without change.


'absolute time' is time independent of change...


So, you guys went with Aristole cause yous don't understand Newton time.

i get it, skool is hard when you get passing grades without showing up in skool.


they colleges lowered the IQ standards...and that's how you got in.


Yous got the iq of a chair and dat is why there are so many chairs in skool...

Thread

sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-25 13:29 -0700
  Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 00:17 -0700
    Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 09:54 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 23:59 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 10:52 -0700
          Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 11:46 -0700
            Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:42 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:43 +0000
      Re: sci.physics.relativity Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:29 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:11 -0700
    Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:40 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:49 +0000
        Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 11:55 -0700
          Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:41 -0700
            Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:44 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:42 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:44 -0700
  Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 02:03 +1000
    Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-26 19:29 +0200
      Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 21:23 +1000
        Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:22 +0200
          Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-28 05:10 +1000
          Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-28 09:09 -0500
            Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 12:36 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 16:55 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 10:52 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 21:53 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 19:05 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-03 06:44 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:43 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:53 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 14:46 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-03 15:47 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:52 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-05 12:07 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:01 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:06 +0000
            Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200
              Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:18 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 18:49 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-01 13:05 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:02 +0200
              Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-29 10:11 -0500
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:55 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:14 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-10 11:32 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:48 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Ování Bodrého <urh@nwroen.ol> - 2018-07-11 10:54 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 05:00 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-12 20:30 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 11:00 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:31 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:29 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 09:39 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 10:58 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:34 +0200
            Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:02 +1000

csiph-web