Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: sci.physics.relativity Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 13:47:55 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 80 Message-ID: <5B3BE0FB.48BA@ix.netcom.com> References: <5B3150BE.2A5D@ix.netcom.com> <02993238-e90e-ab67-d1d1-00e511ba6250@PointedEars.de> <3caf1068-8411-47e5-bb1d-18a669d021fa@googlegroups.com> <6790ebac-fc05-4bb0-b9ec-89d51cfe403e@googlegroups.com> <29b47fcf-f2c7-4437-9460-66b6285ce173@googlegroups.com> <5B37DEBD.B95@ix.netcom.com> <2f5a6585-620d-46b4-9fc2-18618018c67b@googlegroups.com> <5B3B1D87.33A6@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180703-2, 07/03/2018), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:463366 The Starmaker wrote: > > JanPB wrote: > > > > On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 12:48:36 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > JanPB wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 4:55:35 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 3:36:21 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 10:09:22 AM UTC-4, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > > > > On 6/27/18 8:22 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > > > > > > > > SolomonW wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Newton and Newtonian physics are not quite the same thing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First of all, that is nonsense. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it is true, fundamentally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Newton thought that space and time are "absolute". Today, we know that > > > > > > > > absolute space and time are irrelevant, because all of the Newtonian > > > > > > > > laws of physics are valid in any inertial frame (not just a single > > > > > > > > "absolute" frame). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So for the past century (at least), Newton's "absolute space and time" > > > > > > > > have had no effect on any modeling using Newtonian physics. IOW: they > > > > > > > > are just words with no impact. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That’s not truth. Absolute time is use to synch the GPS clock with the ground clock by redefining the GPS second to have 4,4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. [etc. etc.] > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolute time is not used anywhere in physics today. You probably meant > > > > > > some kind of "time by convention". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assertion is not a valid argument. > > > > > > > > Regardless, I _assert_, based on my expertise in the field, that absolute > > > > time is NOT used anywhere in physics today. > > > > > > > > That's how it is, end of story. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > Not end of story...yous people are simply afraid of 'absolute time' because yous simply don't understand it. > > > > Nonsense. > > > > -- > > Jan > > 'The more things change, the more they remain the same.' > > > > Aristole - The more things change... > > Newton - the more they remain the same. (i knows yous people don't understand short sentences...) Aristole believed Time is change... and Newton believed Time flows without change. 'absolute time' is time independent of change... So, you guys went with Aristole cause yous don't understand Newton time. i get it, skool is hard when you get passing grades without showing up in skool. they colleges lowered the IQ standards...and that's how you got in. Yous got the iq of a chair and dat is why there are so many chairs in skool...