Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463093
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <5B37DEBD.B95@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <osednT5BsoyWcanGnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <b45708fc-20c4-48d1-8bce-8b15648cdfc3@googlegroups.com> <3caf1068-8411-47e5-bb1d-18a669d021fa@googlegroups.com> <6790ebac-fc05-4bb0-b9ec-89d51cfe403e@googlegroups.com> <29b47fcf-f2c7-4437-9460-66b6285ce173@googlegroups.com> |
JanPB wrote: > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 4:55:35 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 3:36:21 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 10:09:22 AM UTC-4, tjrob137 wrote: > > > > > On 6/27/18 8:22 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > > > > > SolomonW wrote: > > > > > >> Newton and Newtonian physics are not quite the same thing. > > > > > > > > > > > > First of all, that is nonsense. > > > > > > > > > > No, it is true, fundamentally. > > > > > > > > > > Newton thought that space and time are "absolute". Today, we know that > > > > > absolute space and time are irrelevant, because all of the Newtonian > > > > > laws of physics are valid in any inertial frame (not just a single > > > > > "absolute" frame). > > > > > > > > > > So for the past century (at least), Newton's "absolute space and time" > > > > > have had no effect on any modeling using Newtonian physics. IOW: they > > > > > are just words with no impact. > > > > > > > > That’s not truth. Absolute time is use to synch the GPS clock with the ground clock by redefining the GPS second to have 4,4647 more periods of Cs 133 radiation than the ground clock second. [etc. etc.] > > > > > > Absolute time is not used anywhere in physics today. You probably meant > > > some kind of "time by convention". > > > > > > > Assertion is not a valid argument. > > Regardless, I _assert_, based on my expertise in the field, that absolute > time is NOT used anywhere in physics today. > > That's how it is, end of story. > > -- > Jan Not end of story...yous people are simply afraid of 'absolute time' because yous simply don't understand it. And that which yous don't understand...yous fear. Absolute time is simply eternal time that has been 'divided'... Now, do you understand...time divided? Now try...undivided time. It is time that simply travels by itself, independent of...you. What time is it now?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-25 13:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 00:17 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 09:54 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 23:59 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 11:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:43 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:11 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:40 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:49 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 11:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:41 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 02:03 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-26 19:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 21:23 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:22 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-28 05:10 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-28 09:09 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 12:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 16:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 21:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 19:05 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-03 06:44 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:43 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 14:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-03 15:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-05 12:07 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:01 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:06 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:18 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 18:49 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-01 13:05 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:02 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-29 10:11 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:55 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:14 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-10 11:32 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:48 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Ování Bodrého <urh@nwroen.ol> - 2018-07-11 10:54 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 05:00 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-12 20:30 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 11:00 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:31 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 09:39 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 10:58 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:34 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:02 +1000
csiph-web