Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462877
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2441761.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <riydyyo5ylpu.3vlk44ql9jnc.dlg@40tude.net> <02993238-e90e-ab67-d1d1-00e511ba6250@PointedEars.de> <nf4i2jxkik93.1eojfo62foh97$.dlg@40tude.net> <e6d64558-a1ae-060a-8137-51087cb69f3c@PointedEars.de> <osednT5BsoyWcanGnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Tom Roberts wrote: > On 6/27/18 8:22 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> SolomonW wrote: >>> Newton and Newtonian physics are not quite the same thing. >> >> First of all, that is nonsense. > > No, it is true, fundamentally. No, it is not. > Newton thought that space and time are "absolute". Today, we know that > absolute space and time are irrelevant, because all of the Newtonian > laws of physics are valid in any inertial frame (not just a single > "absolute" frame). But this is not "Newtonian physics". > So for the past century (at least), Newton's "absolute space and time" > have had no effect on any modeling using Newtonian physics. IOW: they > are just words with no impact. Incorrect. >>> To make Newtonian physics to work you need to have some arbitrary point >>> to measure from, think about an object which is measured with x, y, z >>> directions at a time of t. All these measurements are from some >>> arbitrary point and time. > > It actually requires considerably more: an inertial coordinate system. > Just a single point is woefully inadequate. You don’t say. >> Once again: You do not understand what “relativity of space and time” in >> “theories of relativity” means. > > You are lumping together incommensurate theories -- the concepts of > space and time are CONSIDERABLY different among Newtonian physics, SR, > and GR. But all can be classified as "theories of relativity" -- that > phrase is essentially useless. It is not I who is doing the “lumping together” here. PointedEars -- Q: Where are offenders sentenced for light crimes? A: To a prism. (from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-25 13:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 00:17 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 09:54 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 23:59 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 11:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:43 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:11 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:40 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:49 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 11:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:41 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 02:03 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-26 19:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 21:23 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:22 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-28 05:10 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-28 09:09 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 12:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 16:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 21:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 19:05 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-03 06:44 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:43 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 14:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-03 15:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-05 12:07 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:01 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:06 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:18 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 18:49 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-01 13:05 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:02 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-29 10:11 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:55 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:14 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-10 11:32 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:48 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Ování Bodrého <urh@nwroen.ol> - 2018-07-11 10:54 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 05:00 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-12 20:30 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 11:00 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:31 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 09:39 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 10:58 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:34 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:02 +1000
csiph-web