Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #463351
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700 |
| Organization | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
| Message-ID | <5B3BA1BF.1B76@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <5B326FCE.1C4@ix.netcom.com> <5B3335CA.3674@ix.netcom.com> <5B352055.3352@ix.netcom.com> <5B352CFA.7040@ix.netcom.com> <5B3671A4.6D9C@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What does physics have to do with relativity, there is no > > > > > > > matter or energy in...relativity? Not even Time has no energy or > > > > > > > matter.. > > > > > > > > > > > > i mean, 'relativity'.. is not even a...thing. > > > > > > > > > > I mean, you gotta ask yourself a question... > > > > > > > > > > "Why relativity?" > > > > > > > > > > I mean, why of all things on earth.. > > > > > > > > > > of all things in the universe... > > > > > > > > > > why did Albert Einstein choose...relativity? > > > > > > > > > > Did he have a choice? > > > > > > > > > > Albert Einstein once asked "What really interest me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the universe." > > > > > > > > > > So, the question is ...Did Albert Einstein had any choice in the creation of the theory of relativity? > > > > > > > > For example...when Albert Einstein worked at the patent office.. > > > > there was at the time an urgent technological problem of coordinating time along train tracks came about. > > > > Albert Einstein was dealing with patents relating to the synchronization of the clocks at > > > > train stations. > > > > > > > > It seems he had no choice...but to think only about...clocks, and trains. That was his job. > > > > > > > In other words... > > > > > > Einstein had no choice to come up with the theory of relativity because it was his job to come up with it. > > > > > > He found out that clocks moving to one another would not run at the same speed because everybody was trying to > > > file patents where he worked at for the...synchronization of clocks for train stations. > > > > > > There was at the time an urgent technological problem of coordinating time along train tracks, and he had no choice but to...think about it. > > > > > > Yous people don't even know the history of...sci.physics.relativity > > > > Now, what *all* people don't know...is that Albert Einstein was using the patent offices to file...'fake patents'. > > > > The designs were real, but the wordings were fake...it was Albert Einstein way of passing atomic bomb secrets to the Russians. > > > > People thought that the patents didn't work..it was because the wording were fake. > > > > For example...what you thought to be a refridgerator, was in fact a nuclear reactor > > > > what you thought to be a patent for a nuclear reactor was in fact...The Fat Man...the actual device design you drop on the Germans or Japaneese. > > > > what you thought was a woman's blouse was in fact a design for a radiation vest. > > > > Of course, all this is in my book which you problaby haven't read yet.. > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html > > of course if Albert Einstein were living today he probably would send atomic bomb secrets using email... > > he wouldn't push the send button...he would simply write the email and save it as a draft...then give out the password > and the russians would read the unsent emails then delete it. > > And Albert Einstein would say..."I never sent the russians any emails!" Now, here you have (Albert Einstein) a guy who spent around ten years working at a patent office... (you work ten years at anything you become a genuis at it) and at the same time mastered machine technology... then he comes up with this patent: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/96/32/09/16c58837767d66/USD101756.pdf https://patents.google.com/patent/USD101756S/en?inventor=Albert+Einstein Now, you have to ask yourself a question..."Why?"
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-25 13:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 00:17 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 09:54 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 23:59 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 11:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:43 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:29 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:11 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:40 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:49 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 11:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:41 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:42 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:44 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 02:03 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-26 19:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 21:23 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:22 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-28 05:10 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-28 09:09 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 12:36 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 16:55 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 10:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 21:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 19:05 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-03 06:44 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:43 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:53 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 14:46 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-03 15:47 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:52 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-05 12:07 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:01 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:06 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:18 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 18:49 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-01 13:05 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:02 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-29 10:11 -0500
Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:55 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:14 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-10 11:32 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:48 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Ování Bodrého <urh@nwroen.ol> - 2018-07-11 10:54 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 05:00 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-12 20:30 +1000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 11:00 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:31 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:29 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 09:39 -0700
Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 10:58 +0000
Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:34 +0200
Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:02 +1000
csiph-web