Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462981

Re: sci.physics.relativity

Message-ID	<5B3671A4.6D9C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: sci.physics.relativity
References	(1 earlier) <5B31E87D.6C2B@ix.netcom.com> <5B326FCE.1C4@ix.netcom.com> <5B3335CA.3674@ix.netcom.com> <5B352055.3352@ix.netcom.com> <5B352CFA.7040@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does physics have to do with relativity, there is no
> > > > > > matter or energy in...relativity? Not even Time has no energy or
> > > > > > matter..
> > > > >
> > > > > i mean, 'relativity'.. is not even a...thing.
> > > >
> > > > I mean, you gotta ask yourself a question...
> > > >
> > > > "Why relativity?"
> > > >
> > > > I mean, why of all things on earth..
> > > >
> > > > of all things in the universe...
> > > >
> > > > why did Albert Einstein choose...relativity?
> > > >
> > > > Did he have a choice?
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein once asked "What really interest me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the universe."
> > > >
> > > > So, the question is ...Did Albert Einstein had any choice in the creation of the theory of relativity?
> > >
> > > For example...when Albert Einstein worked at the patent office..
> > > there was at the time an urgent technological problem of coordinating time along train tracks came about.
> > > Albert Einstein was dealing with patents relating to the synchronization of the clocks at
> > > train stations.
> > >
> > > It seems he had no choice...but to think only about...clocks, and trains. That was his job.

> >
> > In other words...
> >
> > Einstein had no choice to come up with the theory of relativity because it was his job to come up with it.
> >
> > He found out that clocks moving to one another would not run at the same speed because everybody was trying to
> > file patents where he worked at for the...synchronization of clocks for train stations.
> >
> > There was at the time an urgent technological problem of coordinating time along train tracks, and he had no choice but to...think about it.
> >
> > Yous people don't even know the history of...sci.physics.relativity
> 
> Now, what *all* people don't know...is that Albert Einstein was using the patent offices to file...'fake patents'.
> 
> The designs were real, but the wordings were fake...it was Albert Einstein way of passing atomic bomb secrets to the Russians.
> 
> People thought that the patents didn't work..it was because the wording were fake.
> 
> For example...what you thought to be a refridgerator, was in fact a nuclear reactor
> 
> what you thought to be a patent for a nuclear reactor was in fact...The Fat Man...the actual device design you drop on the Germans or Japaneese.
> 
> what you thought was a woman's blouse was in fact a design for a radiation vest.
> 
> Of course, all this is in my book which you problaby haven't read yet..
> 
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html


of course if Albert Einstein were living today he probably would send atomic bomb secrets using email...

he wouldn't push the send button...he would simply write the email and save it as a draft...then give out the password
and the russians would read the unsent emails then delete it.

And Albert Einstein would say..."I never sent the russians any emails!"

Thread

sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-25 13:29 -0700
  Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 00:17 -0700
    Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 09:54 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-26 23:59 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 10:52 -0700
          Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-28 11:46 -0700
            Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-29 10:51 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 09:18 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:42 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:43 +0000
      Re: sci.physics.relativity Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 14:29 -0700
        Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:11 -0700
    Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 10:40 -0700
      Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:49 +0000
        Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 11:55 -0700
          Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:41 -0700
            Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-04 14:44 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:42 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:44 -0700
  Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 02:03 +1000
    Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-26 19:29 +0200
      Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-27 21:23 +1000
        Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-27 15:22 +0200
          Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-06-28 05:10 +1000
          Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-28 09:09 -0500
            Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
              Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 12:36 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 16:55 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 10:52 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 12:49 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-30 21:53 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 19:05 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-03 06:44 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 08:43 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-02 23:53 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 13:47 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-03 14:46 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-03 15:47 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-04 17:52 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-05 12:07 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-30 15:01 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-30 22:06 +0000
            Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-28 11:08 +0200
              Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:18 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 18:49 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-01 13:05 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:02 +0200
              Re: sci.physics.relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-06-29 10:11 -0500
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-29 15:55 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-30 19:14 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-10 11:32 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-10 20:48 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Ování Bodrého <urh@nwroen.ol> - 2018-07-11 10:54 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 05:00 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-12 20:30 +1000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 11:00 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:31 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:29 +0200
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-07-12 09:39 -0700
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-12 10:58 +0000
                Re: sci.physics.relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-12 18:34 +0200
            Re: sci.physics.relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-06-29 12:02 +1000

csiph-web