Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.environment > #102542

Re: a small but significant win

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.global-warming, sci.environment, aus.general, aus.politics
Subject Re: a small but significant win
Date Fri, 16 Oct 2026 06:48:33 +1100
Lines 85
Message-ID <op.3w82m7xobyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink)
References <11a4dnf$1tkk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <11ajc2k$3tlpq$2@dont-email.me> <6vlqclhjdev4ui9k37eoq1g9g2ublqdhm2@4ax.com> <ac0uclhcel2bo7s5oj45es8t1gbiddm0ln@4ax.com> <op.3w53o6ybbyq249@pvr2.lan> <11anavu$1m7j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <prduclpio9e1fkk9lv7qffcn1vfbqla5v3@4ax.com> <op.3w6xrv0gbyq249@pvr2.lan> <gtpvcldd7pch92hd3j9gotj2h3nqi2ktvf@4ax.com> <11aopgc$1r235$4@dont-email.me> <7mrvcltj8qgdcjmiq9rfsh6ms1jm1gvpse@4ax.com> <11aqvtd$2iuq6$3@dont-email.me> <6462dl18tqbq39hs4f5ko0dh7vhaih92oe@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding Quoted-Printable
X-Trace individual.net HdwOPwBbzsElBXnMK2L05AMGlgLP86GeXT1eMmr12vgfTidnk=
Cancel-Lock sha1:9koSBvvQQ0+oW+gHcLfSRx6CncU= sha256:bl0eCo/bO91WooH5UGlz185zF7CkbTDT5X4JuMmhWgs=
User-Agent Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Xref csiph.com alt.global-warming:781884 sci.environment:102542 aus.general:20210 aus.politics:764468

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> multistrada <ab@in.valid> wrote
>> Petzl wrote
>>> multistrada <ab@in.valid> wrote

>>>> So how about your version of the LP?

>>> Consider myself Labor Party, this "Labor Party" has no Labor people in
>>> Cabinet. Haven't for decades! LP the same.

>> We historically have had parties morph out of what they were as well,

All partys do that

>> just not lately -

That's bullshit given the demise of the Tea Party freaks in the repugs  
party

> for that we have the uniparty complicity scam.

That's mindless bullshit. hasn't happened

> Suppose it's free enterprise?

More of your mindless bullshit

> Honesty though thrown out the door!

Politics never had anything like that

>>> Never voted Liberal Rod Speed and Ördög claim I do.

I have never ever said anything about how you vote

>>> When I vote if their is some sort of Christianin poll, that's who I    
>>> vote for,

Wota terminal fuckwit

>>> realistically though with Preference system they are a
>>> funnel for the pretend LP.

More of your mindless bullshit

>> Sad.

> I like first past the winning post as in it gives a better more honest
> Government not one rum by lobbyists

More of your mindless bullshit

> "Our" Media and Major parties are run by lobbyists

More of your mindless bullshit

> Lobbyists write the laws, parliament sells the laws,
> paid lucrative commissions for passing their laws.
> That’s the modern legislative business of parliament.

More of your mindless bullshit

>>> Every Western countries are finding all you are ending up with a Party
>>> system are well spoken greedy, lying grabbing corrupt career
>>> politician whose only purpose is to keep their snout and trotters in
>>> the golden trough

>> Fact.

Bullshit

> Afraid so, grifters all and only allow other griffters in politics to
> protect each other!

Ming and Whitless were never that

Neither were Chifley and Curtin

Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
  Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
      Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
      Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:50 +0000
          Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:01 -0600
            Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:30 +1100

csiph-web