Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.environment > #102501
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.global-warming, sci.environment, aus.general, aus.politics |
| Subject | Re: a small but significant win |
| Date | 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.3w6bp4r0byq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink) |
| References | <11a4dnf$1tkk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <11ajc2k$3tlpq$2@dont-email.me> <6vlqclhjdev4ui9k37eoq1g9g2ublqdhm2@4ax.com> <ac0uclhcel2bo7s5oj45es8t1gbiddm0ln@4ax.com> <d32ucldnd0rkc48gfjrcmuuveg4am889ti@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote > Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> wrote >> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote >>> In Australia it is compulsory to vote, >>> Right now done by preferential system Yes >>> where you must vote in order of >>> preference 1 for party A, 2 for B, 3 for C and so on a minimum of 16 >>> times to be counted, OR just put one in the box for your party choice That alternative varys with the juridiction >>> This has designed prefences decided by the party box you tick >>> And this is what happens That alternative varys with the juridiction >> So you're forced to vote, and then all you can do is vote >> for a party, not a candidate? Do you people have any say >> as to who the candidates are, or does the party decide >> all that for you? > if a Candidate wishes to stand as a independent that candidate is not > given a party box, so to vote you have to fully open the ballot paper > (tablecloth size in a voting box that is to small to open without it > being folded) That's bullshit with most electorates > You then need to put 1 in that candidates box then find 15 others to > continue in your order preference That number is bullshit with most electorates > (most just donkey vote 1 to 16) Complete and utter bullshit > Have not seen anyone bother easier to put 1 in a party box then go to > a pub. Because you never get to see how anyone else votes > Below is how "Albanese Labor" gets in he stands as a "Labor Party" > candidate, but none in his cabernet are representative of being > Labor Party people Because you have never had a fucking clue > (their only purpose is to be reelected for more Greed Grab and theft) Just more of your mindless bullshit > My take Just more of your mindless bullshit > I don't even see "Albanese Labor" government as Labor party. You have always been and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant Your 'take' in spades <reams of your steaming turds flushed where they belong>
Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:50 +0000
Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:01 -0600
Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:30 +1100
csiph-web