Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Julian Gilbey Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Boyuan Yang X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 8 07:33:48 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.69 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20060 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YsfdzIGATEtDp53V@d-and-j.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 43 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Louis-Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E9ronneau?= , debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 08:33:32 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org> <17ec1b326da557e7eb479d56d7a1b6e3172c0cc3.camel@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14228 On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400，Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道： > > On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > > > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > > > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > > > > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is > > > there > > > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > > > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, > > > what > > > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > > > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > > > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Boyuan Yang > > > > > > > > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 > > > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517 > > > > Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the > > "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and > > let people know they can migrate to it. > > This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 . > > Cheers, > Boyuan Yang Brilliant! Thanks for this! (I think you'll need to do a source-only upload now to allow migration to testing, unless the procedures have changed recently.) Best wishes, Julian