Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14202

Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
Date	Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:20:01 +0200
Message-ID	<EDlap-7OvH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EDjrX-7Nrz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 28 15:19:58 2022
Old-Return-Path	<pollo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-6.188 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_MX=-3.1 (check from: .debian. - helo: .mx1.riseup. - helo-domain: .riseup.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -4.6
X-Riseup-User-ID	0ED2B288F3942C952DA5C41656809CC9232FDCB0E97F573B877720C4CF64775D
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20031
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	30
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:19:16 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14202

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
> 
> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, what
> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Boyuan Yang
> 
> 
> [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517
> [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517

Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the
"missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and
let people know they can migrate to it.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Thread

pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:30 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 15:40 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-06-29 17:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-30 08:40 +0200
  Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-06-28 17:20 +0200
    Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-07 21:40 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 08:00 +0200
      Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-08 09:40 +0200
  Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2022-07-03 00:50 +0200
    Re: Packaging of pdm (Was: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-08 09:20 +0200

csiph-web