Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?UTF-8?Q?Louis-Philippe_V=c3=a9ronneau?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 28 15:19:58 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.188 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_MX=-3.1 (check from: .debian. - helo: .mx1.riseup. - helo-domain: .riseup.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -4.6 X-Riseup-User-ID: 0ED2B288F3942C952DA5C41656809CC9232FDCB0E97F573B877720C4CF64775D MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20031 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 30 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:19:16 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org> X-Original-References: <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14202 On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, what > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > Regards, > Boyuan Yang > > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517 Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and let people know they can migrate to it. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄