Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date	Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<JlsLL-bvux-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<J247f-3hPw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J3nhv-48Hk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jlez8-bmMb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <JleIO-bmPF-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jlf29-bmW9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, debian-superh@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-superh-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 11 10:24:59 2024
Old-Return-Path	<glaubitz@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-8.771 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
User-Agent	Evolution 3.52.4
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Originating-IP	91.19.168.248
X-Zedat-Hint	PO
X-Mailing-List	<debian-superh@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/2731
List-ID	<debian-superh.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ef019d2bafb54d02e0c51018406ee3776da8873b.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	33
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:24:40 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<ef019d2bafb54d02e0c51018406ee3776da8873b.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-References	<531f976c5b275f85abaf98ab89ec3ed9be6aa6ff.camel@decadent.org.uk> <24debffba793d0ca9a3671d91c5d7e74a49beb2a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <d8c9c72220538b284bdcad4a2aa5719156bda791.camel@decadent.org.uk> <6570acc16a8cd0c566d3e29b9d74b79a89694c36.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <f12853e714f1a6054b1791f588bc715ab4db8820.camel@decadent.org.uk> <6073bb5b32325be05af4faeb333d1f457630756e.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <d02a626a83d9d740bf55eab75ed0ca8b371468d0.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.ports.superh:455 linux.debian.kernel:83907

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 21:43 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Yes, I can give it a try tomorrow. Can I just apply the changes from the
> > branch on top of the current kernel package and then just build the package
> > with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" or is there anything else I need to know?
> 
> A few things (that you may know already):
> 
> - You can speed this up by deleting the other sh4 flavour definition in
>   debian/config/sh4/defines.toml.
> - Run "debian/rules debian/control-real" before building (and after
>   deleting the other flavour).
> - If you are cross building, use the "cross" build-profile.
> - You can skip building user-space packages by using the
>   "pkg.linux.notools" build profile.  (Without that, cross-build-
>   dependencies may often be unsatisfiable due to version skew.)

OK, thanks a lot, this is very useful to know.

But just to clarify, can I just apply this to the current latest Debian
package, run debian/rules debian/control-real and build the package
normally?

Sorry, if that's too obvious, I just want to avoid producing noise.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web