Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

From	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject	Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date	2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
Message-ID	<Jlf29-bmW9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J3nhv-48Hk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jlez8-bmMb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <JleIO-bmPF-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 21:28 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 21:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I'll give it a try next week as I'm currently not at home and unable
> > > to access the board for testing. While I can reach the board via SSH,
> > > I don't have any kind of remote management.
> > 
> > Are you able to test now?
> 
> Yes, I can give it a try tomorrow. Can I just apply the changes from the
> branch on top of the current kernel package and then just build the package
> with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" or is there anything else I need to know?

A few things (that you may know already):

- You can speed this up by deleting the other sh4 flavour definition in
  debian/config/sh4/defines.toml.
- Run "debian/rules debian/control-real" before building (and after
  deleting the other flavour).
- If you are cross building, use the "cross" build-profile.
- You can skip building user-space packages by using the
  "pkg.linux.notools" build profile.  (Without that, cross-build-
  dependencies may often be unsatisfiable due to version skew.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to write an incorrect program
than to understand a correct one.

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web