Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83995

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

From John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
Message-ID <JmQCl-cmJD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <JlsLL-bvux-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JlwZ3-bxZB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jlxip-byq5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JmgSd-c0O8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JmJhv-ciev-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 00:10 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I've done a new cross-build here, so you can test the packages from:
> https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux-sh4/

Thanks a lot.

I installed the new kernel package and it seems it won't work as it's not
an U-Boot image as required but just a plain compressed kernel image:

root@tirpitz:~> file /boot/vmlinuz-6.11-rc5+unreleased-sh7785lcr 
/boot/vmlinuz-6.11-rc5+unreleased-sh7785lcr: Linux kernel
root@tirpitz:~>

My working custom kernel looks like this:

root@tirpitz:~> file /mnt/uImage-6.5.gz 
/mnt/uImage-6.5.gz: u-boot legacy uImage, Linux-6.5.0, Linux/SuperH, OS Kernel Image (gzip), 4421099 bytes, Fri May  3 11:48:38 2024, Load Address: 0X80001000, Entry Point: 0X80002000, Header CRC:
0X98EEB114, Data CRC: 0X2F5A3D34
root@tirpitz:~>

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web