Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83993

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
Message-ID <JmJhv-ciev-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <Jlf29-bmW9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JlsLL-bvux-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JlwZ3-bxZB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jlxip-byq5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JmgSd-c0O8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 2024-09-13 at 17:59 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 17:14 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 16:55 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > OK, thanks a lot, this is very useful to know.
> > > > 
> > > > But just to clarify, can I just apply this to the current latest Debian
> > > > package, run debian/rules debian/control-real and build the package
> > > > normally?
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, if that's too obvious, I just want to avoid producing noise.
> > > 
> > > You can apply it to the latest version in experimental, yes.
> > 
> > Thanks! Will give it a try.
> 
> Just as a heads-up: I need a few more days as my sh4 builder is currently busy
> with some GCC test builds ahead of the GCC SH LRA transition. I will test your
> patch set as soon as possible and definitely before the end of next week.

I've done a new cross-build here, so you can test the packages from:
https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/linux-sh4/

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If the facts do not conform to your theory, they must be disposed of.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web