Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.ports.superh > #452
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? |
| Date | 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Jlez8-bmMb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <J247f-3hPw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J3nhv-48Hk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 14:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 15:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > [...] > > > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian > > > > kernel package, and if so how? > > > > > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love > > > to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce > > > the kernel image size at this point though. > > > > > > I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel. > > > > I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit: > > <https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>. > > > > Can you test that this produces a working kernel? > > I'll give it a try next week as I'm currently not at home and unable > to access the board for testing. While I can reach the board via SSH, > I don't have any kind of remote management. Are you able to test now? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.
Back to linux.debian.ports.superh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200
Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2024-09-15 03:20 +0200
GCC SH LRA - was: Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:20 +0200
csiph-web