Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.ports.superh > #452

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
Message-ID <Jlez8-bmMb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <J247f-3hPw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J3nhv-48Hk-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 14:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 15:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian
> > > >   kernel package, and if so how?
> > > 
> > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love
> > > to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce
> > > the kernel image size at this point though.
> > > 
> > > I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel.
> > 
> > I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit:
> > <https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>.
> > 
> > Can you test that this produces a working kernel?
> 
> I'll give it a try next week as I'm currently not at home and unable
> to access the board for testing. While I can reach the board via SSH,
> I don't have any kind of remote management.

Are you able to test now?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to write an incorrect program
than to understand a correct one.

Back to linux.debian.ports.superh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2024-09-15 03:20 +0200
                GCC SH LRA - was: Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:20 +0200

csiph-web