Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83909

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 12:24 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 21:43 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Yes, I can give it a try tomorrow. Can I just apply the changes from the
> > > branch on top of the current kernel package and then just build the package
> > > with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" or is there anything else I need to know?
> > 
> > A few things (that you may know already):
> > 
> > - You can speed this up by deleting the other sh4 flavour definition in
> >   debian/config/sh4/defines.toml.
> > - Run "debian/rules debian/control-real" before building (and after
> >   deleting the other flavour).
> > - If you are cross building, use the "cross" build-profile.
> > - You can skip building user-space packages by using the
> >   "pkg.linux.notools" build profile.  (Without that, cross-build-
> >   dependencies may often be unsatisfiable due to version skew.)
> 
> OK, thanks a lot, this is very useful to know.
> 
> But just to clarify, can I just apply this to the current latest Debian
> package, run debian/rules debian/control-real and build the package
> normally?
> 
> Sorry, if that's too obvious, I just want to avoid producing noise.

You can apply it to the latest version in experimental, yes.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web