Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #83899

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.superh, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:20:02 +0200
Message-ID <Jlez8-bmMb-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <J247f-3hPw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2ofD-3xwL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <J2EDL-3HC8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <J3nhv-48Hk-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-superh-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 10 19:17:07 2024
Old-Return-Path <ben@decadent.org.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.373 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6ERP4Wk/gTThNVF6IDQS"
User-Agent Evolution 3.53.2-1
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP 2a02:578:851f:1502:391e:c5f5:10e2:b9a3
X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From ben@decadent.org.uk
X-Sa-Exim-Scanned No (on maynard); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailing-List <debian-superh@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/2728
List-ID <debian-superh.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/f12853e714f1a6054b1791f588bc715ab4db8820.camel@decadent.org.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 63
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:16:45 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <f12853e714f1a6054b1791f588bc715ab4db8820.camel@decadent.org.uk>
X-Original-References <531f976c5b275f85abaf98ab89ec3ed9be6aa6ff.camel@decadent.org.uk> <24debffba793d0ca9a3671d91c5d7e74a49beb2a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> <d8c9c72220538b284bdcad4a2aa5719156bda791.camel@decadent.org.uk> <6570acc16a8cd0c566d3e29b9d74b79a89694c36.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.ports.superh:452 linux.debian.kernel:83899

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 14:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 15:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian
> > > >   kernel package, and if so how?
> > > 
> > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love
> > > to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce
> > > the kernel image size at this point though.
> > > 
> > > I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel.
> > 
> > I made some config changes that bring the size back under the limit:
> > <https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1133>.
> > 
> > Can you test that this produces a working kernel?
> 
> I'll give it a try next week as I'm currently not at home and unable
> to access the board for testing. While I can reach the board via SSH,
> I don't have any kind of remote management.

Are you able to test now?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to write an incorrect program
than to understand a correct one.

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-20 00:40 +0200
  Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-20 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-07-21 15:20 +0200
      Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-07-23 15:00 +0200
        Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:20 +0200
          Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-10 21:30 +0200
            Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-10 21:50 +0200
              Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 12:30 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-11 17:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-11 17:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-13 18:00 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 00:20 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2024-09-15 08:10 +0200
                Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-15 18:30 +0200

csiph-web