Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #6732

Re: Programming

From Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Programming
Date 2016-07-18 10:35 +0100
Organization Origin Sonata
Message-ID <nmi7tv$vk3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <6a8820b3-253a-479f-93ec-f2e03efe5753@googlegroups.com> <nmgd5k$mkv$1@dont-email.me> <87d1mcjc3e.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <nmh60m$ah6$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.31f6652cfa127e1798a381@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 18/07/16 10:02, J. Clarke wrote:
> In article <nmh60m$ah6$1@dont-email.me>, rjh@cpax.org.uk says...
>>
>> On 17/07/16 20:31, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 17/07/16 17:16, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 5:40:21 PM UTC+2, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>>>> Once you've mastered PHP, you're probably ready to tackle a "real"
>>>>>> programming language (although I'm being unfair to PHP).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Real programs for real users tend to be written in languages such as C
>>>>>> or C++. Toy programs for toy users (e.g. Windows users) tend to be
>>>>>> written in VB.NET or C#. So you kind of have to choose which way you
>>>>>> want to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Congratulations: good load of bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations: well-reasoned argument, carefully thought out and
>>>> skilfully presented to win hearts and minds.
>>>
>>> Your points got exactly the level of reasoned argument that they
>>> deserve.  (I thought you were joking so I didn't say anything first time
>>> round.)
>>
>> Ouch. No, I wasn't joking.
>>
>> I answered as I did because the tone of the OP gave me the impression
>> that the OP wanted to learn programming without a lot of investment of
>> effort on his part ("tell me the easiest way"). There is no question
>> whatsoever in my mind that HTML is the easiest-to-learn mainstream
>> computer language (and note that I have carefully avoided saying
>> "programming language"). With only a modicum of knowledge you can
>> produce a reasonable product quite quickly. Then all you have to do to
>> turn that HTML into legal PHP is to rename the file. Next, you can start
>> playing with simple PHP constructs, and before you know it you're doing
>> loops and stuff. And that's quite a gentle entry into the world of
>> programming, which I would argue constitutes a reasonable answer to "the
>> easiest way".
>>
>> I question your claim, sir.
>
> One of the dumb ways to blow a job interview is to go off about things
> like "Toy programs for toy users (e.g. Windows users) tend to be
> written in VB.NET or C#".

Oh, /that/? Well, it's true. And Usenet isn't a job interview. Among 
other things, it's a place for going off about things. :-)

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Programming HQM <harisqmega@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 07:07 -0700
  Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-16 16:40 +0100
    Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-17 09:16 -0700
      Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-17 17:53 +0100
        Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-17 20:31 +0100
          Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 00:57 +0100
            Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 05:36 +0100
              Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 08:13 -0700
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:33 +0100
                Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 16:44 +0100
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 17:01 +0100
                Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 09:16 -0700
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 17:23 +0100
                Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 09:28 -0700
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 18:00 +0100
                Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 18:28 +0100
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 18:54 +0100
                Re: Programming "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2016-07-18 21:12 +0100
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 21:24 +0100
                Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 14:49 -0700
                Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-18 20:03 +0100
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 20:24 +0100
                Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 16:17 -0700
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:30 -0400
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:22 -0400
              Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 16:25 +0100
              Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 21:18 -0400
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-19 03:35 +0100
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:37 -0400
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 00:50 +0100
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:41 -0400
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 03:31 -0400
                Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 21:01 -0400
            Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 05:02 -0400
              Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 10:35 +0100
            Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-18 10:02 +0100
            Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 07:52 -0700
              Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:25 +0100
                Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 08:32 -0700
                Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:36 +0100
    Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 13:02 +0100
      Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 13:38 +0100
  Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-16 22:38 +0100
  Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-17 09:20 -0700

csiph-web