Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2169
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? |
| Date | Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:50:38 +0000 |
| Lines | 43 |
| Message-ID | <eunjpaxjrd.ln2@phoenix.fire> (permalink) |
| References | <bi7sl3F4gk4U1@mid.individual.net> <l9mieg$tmo$2@dont-email.me> <bi89flF75ajU1@mid.individual.net> <l9mtlf$nia$2@dont-email.me> <bi8dldF74f2U5@mid.individual.net> <bi8tdnFbco9U1@mid.individual.net> <52c01276$0$300$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <biakl3Flu76U1@mid.individual.net> <52c05d4a$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <bibgerFrrt0U2@mid.individual.net> <l9q2la$irb$2@dont-email.me> <52c0bbdd$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <l9v4om$24pc$1@saria.nerim.net> <bijk5qFini6U1@mid.individual.net> <52c58a0a$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 8CMSTeHrVw9rWPPEd1/hgw6GFF+M3orVr58Y5fjDtAyanT1fo= |
| X-Orig-Path | phoenix.fire!not-for-mail |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Lyuy5sTYKnYcPkWEsWX6MUyjPKE= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <52c58a0a$0$297$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:2169 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/02/2014 03:47 PM, Henrik Carlqvist wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 22:46:19 +0000, Peter Chant wrote: >> Either way, I've tried a Y cable on the PC to give more power that way - >> to no avail. Did not try it with the hub. Suspect it is a >> firmware/chipset clash somewhere. > > Too bad. I haven't heard of any such clash before, but I have seen some > USB 3 ports being capable of totally hanging the machine when used. > > Sorry that we were not able to solve your problem. > Thank you for your time, it is appreciated. I only posted here when I though I'd exchausted all avenues. > One final test which will not solve your problem: Does the scanner work > when connected to the computer where it has previously worked, but with > the USB hub between the computer and the scanner? > Not tried that. Scanner currently at parents - I'll pick it up soonish as it is doing no good there. > If not, it might instead of a current problem be a voltage problem, but > that problem cannot be solved with a Y-cable. Maybe it would be possible > to solve with another hub or another power supply for the hub. > Hmm. Only have the one powered hub! If it is a voltage issue seems odd to have bad luck with both the PC and the hub. However, trying the hub with a PC that it has worked with might chase down any hub issues. > If the scanner still works on the working computer with the hub connected > it might be a chipset clash as you say, or possibly some software > difference between the machines which has been overlooked. If not firmware perhaps UDEV, it seems not to be giving correct permissions to the device via /dev/bus/???/??? but then root is having no more luck with scanimage -L. I'mm going to look through my bit box to see if I have any spare PCI/usb cards to see if that affects anything. Not sure whether I have any spare or whether new PC as any standard PCI slots!
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000
csiph-web