Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2167
| From | Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? |
| Date | 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bijk5qFini6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <52c05d4a$0$296$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <bibgerFrrt0U2@mid.individual.net> <l9q2la$irb$2@dont-email.me> <52c0bbdd$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <l9v4om$24pc$1@saria.nerim.net> |
On 12/31/2013 07:09 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Henrik Carlqvist a écrit : >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 15:02:34 -0600, philo wrote: >>> What would be the point, you already have established that a powered hub >>> did not do the trick. >> >> The point is that the powered hub by specification only gives 0.5 A which >> is only the same as a USB port on a motherboard which exactly complies >> with the USB 2.0 standard. > > That's the theory. The real thing is, none of the few USB 2.0 hubs I > have examined did control or limit in any way the current drawn on each > port. So the current was only limited by the power supply. > Either way, I've tried a Y cable on the PC to give more power that way - to no avail. Did not try it with the hub. Suspect it is a firmware/chipset clash somewhere. Pete
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000
csiph-web