Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2151
| From | notbob <notbob@nothome.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? |
| Date | 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bi8dldF74f2U5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <bi7sl3F4gk4U1@mid.individual.net> <l9mieg$tmo$2@dont-email.me> <bi89flF75ajU1@mid.individual.net> <l9mtlf$nia$2@dont-email.me> |
On 2013-12-28, philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote: > If your USB port is flaky, a powered hub will not help. Perhaps you have more than one. My Vaio towers have USB connectors in the front AND the back. The front one's were wimpy and fell apart quickly. I now use a hub plugged into the back. I see one advantage to a hub. Plugging/unplugging USB connectors into a computer's ports puts a lotta strain on those port sockets. Best to plug in one connector to the 'puter and let the hub suffer the traffic/abuse, as they are cheap and replaceable. nb
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000
csiph-web