Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard?

From	Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject	Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard?
Date	2013-12-28 21:23 +0000
Message-ID	<bi8tfpFbco9U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<bi7sl3F4gk4U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlbu754.2h60.knock_yourself_out@vps.jonz.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/28/2013 06:47 PM, Allodoxaphobia wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:03:35 +0000, Peter Chant wrote:
>>
>> Epsom scanner works first time on all machines.
>
>    ... and good for relaxing the motherboard bus and drawing
>    toxins from the cache memory.
>

That explains it, whereas a Canon perforates the motherboard and also 
the building it is housed in...

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
  Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
    Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
      Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
        Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
          Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
            Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
            Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
              Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
                Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
  Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
    Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000

csiph-web