Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2159
| From | Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? |
| Date | 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <biakl3Flu76U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <bi89flF75ajU1@mid.individual.net> <l9mtlf$nia$2@dont-email.me> <bi8dldF74f2U5@mid.individual.net> <bi8tdnFbco9U1@mid.individual.net> <52c01276$0$300$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On 12/29/2013 12:15 PM, Henrik Carlqvist wrote: > I just checked the specifications of the scanner, it is supposed to > consume no more than 2.5W which equals 0.5A at 5V. This is exactly what a > USB 2.0 port should be able to deliver. A USB 1.0 port will not be able to > deliver that much current. A flaky motherboard or a motherboard connected > to a flay PSU might not be able to give 0.5A on a USB 2.0 port. The hub should be good for 500mA according to Amazon, where I bought it. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Plugable-Port-Power-Adapter-Mains/dp/B006Z061HU/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1388321741&sr=8-6&keywords=usb+10+port#productDetails Plugable USB 2.0 10 Port Hub (with Power Adapter for UK and EU Mains) When I looked at the reviews this seemed to be the better of the 10 port powered hubs. Pete
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 12:03 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 07:07 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 10:18 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2013-12-28 16:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:22 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-28 16:04 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 00:29 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 12:15 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 12:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 13:05 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-29 17:35 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-29 21:00 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 15:02 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2013-12-30 00:18 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2013-12-29 18:26 -0600
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-30 10:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2013-12-31 20:09 +0100
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-01 22:46 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2014-01-02 15:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2014-01-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? margaretict@googlemail.com - 2014-01-29 02:25 -0800
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-12-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Bad combination of scanner and motherboard? Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> - 2013-12-28 21:23 +0000
csiph-web