Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291732

Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)
Date 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
Organization ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID <hgnbvhg8.efa@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <b28ad674-9e81-4075-bfd4-166dd289085d@googlegroups.com> <d2db8825-8718-4735-a2d3-89af70a5dbab@googlegroups.com> <nnghdi3.a3r3@rooftop.invalid> <f5fa8f0d-5fd6-442c-ae99-37c80ceb9109@googlegroups.com> <076be697-9bb5-4461-9289-9db02c3e4b4b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 10:04:41 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:58:46 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> > >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> (snip)
>> > >> 
>> > >> > Nope.  Still your key:
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26
>> > >> >       "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
>> > >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
>> > >> >  
>> > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key.
>> > >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > pub   2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27
>> > >> > uid                  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> > >> > sub   2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > pub   4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26]
>> > >> > uid                  Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
>> > >> > sub   4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26]
>> > >> 
>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > >> Hash: SHA512
>> > >> 
>> > >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so.
>> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>> > >> 
>> > >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3
>> > >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE
>> > >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY
>> > >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c
>> > >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt
>> > >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl
>> > >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u
>> > >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj
>> > >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj
>> > >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI
>> > >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f
>> > >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40
>> > >> =YaAD
>> > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > 
>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > > Hash: SHA512
>> > 
>> > > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF?
>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>> > 
>> > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW
>> > > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1
>> > > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR
>> > > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg
>> > > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge
>> > > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM
>> > > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR
>> > > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB
>> > > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw
>> > > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL
>> > > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI
>> > > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto
>> > > =aD9M
>> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > 
>> > I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping.
>> > 
>> > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D
>> > gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>"
>> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> > gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
>> > Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD  8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D
>> > 
>> > Must be a google screwup.  Try a long message with hard returns before
>> > 80 character mark and see if it signs properly.
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512
>> 
>> Yeah, I was actually doing that before I saw this post show up. I'm going to try another long line here to see if it breaks again... pretty sure it will. I don't think this was happening on the iMac, I reposted that first post and it had some long lines in it.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>> 
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbVSAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dMIIP/0Y6N+98Y3OpFaql442Ysgl0
>> w9osZ439x3jnCUGLUjBM5GhGwdm9gId4VhbiSWOYjhWA6eMyCW+ro4fW+6X2Qv6f
>> 9aQpjWDCkmCHtaBwQ3u3XGaeu/x/7nYZW/L1g02k7VIlqCCN0stbPZpFvW4qUt8I
>> IcLJjR7iZfxCXrMVSvmJGAoo9zOerujELfYN628mc6/CW30PDSTnaqSMsxqlZhDu
>> iyVbomJ54CC0mFRBjPzyOjMXtfeEQJ5YAYcpeiMFSj8PrFoSSwm3ec6BoExGclU0
>> 3870ubaqIeItn/I1jTZvE3wtJLh9myJBDtveuII7HT8pRYdATm80/Oqg56XxmLCA
>> AWnfNEAlfLTeQtS+NDyjt/EAOVRS2IREYUpdOlB1fuXygzwSUWDk4UUbry1niL+i
>> lfhUfs0Ct2om8+baQV8reQGLSrnA0GA+L2YpshdMvoBOGgwRMbJZgzmbTzWD19j+
>> yWqtE+5xl/br9FihxkfudE9wpPJuQ6AafWNW6uhq8RZt2qJooZM7D7/l6x+9C9xY
>> DzadB0MRajS0nniKTGGUAEfVi8PjVpPSjEXt+VbP9DRL4hJQslkqkspr79OpERrD
>> 7S+1yRX+lCzxlrRyQlnWXyGTROhmV/tULFhIjmedFH0ec4VJbaUSnCSm/6izTUxN
>> D6MYp1i/yJe6h429311W
>> =y7/8
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

> Weird, that long one worked.

Yeah I get a good sig too.  Still think google is doing it.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
      Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
          Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
            Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
              Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700

csiph-web