Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291171 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 77 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nnghdi3.a3r3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291721 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >> > Nope. Still your key: >> > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> > "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key. >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> > >> > pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> > uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> > sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> > >> > pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> > uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> > sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 >> =YaAD >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1 > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto > =aD9M > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping. gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD 8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D Must be a google screwup. Try a long message with hard returns before 80 character mark and see if it signs properly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5fa8f0d-5fd6-442c-ae99-37c80ceb9109@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291725 |
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:58:46 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> > >> (snip) > >> > >> > Nope. Still your key: > >> > > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 > >> > "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available > >> > > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key. > >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. > >> > > >> > pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 > >> > uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >> > sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 > >> > > >> > pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > >> > uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> > >> > sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > >> > >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 > >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE > >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY > >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c > >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt > >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl > >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u > >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj > >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj > >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI > >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f > >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 > >> =YaAD > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW > > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1 > > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR > > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg > > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge > > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM > > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR > > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB > > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw > > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL > > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI > > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto > > =aD9M > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping. > > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D > gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD 8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D > > Must be a google screwup. Try a long message with hard returns before > 80 character mark and see if it signs properly. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Yeah, I was actually doing that before I saw this post show up. I'm going to try another long line here to see if it breaks again... pretty sure it will. I don't think this was happening on the iMac, I reposted that first post and it had some long lines in it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbVSAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dMIIP/0Y6N+98Y3OpFaql442Ysgl0 w9osZ439x3jnCUGLUjBM5GhGwdm9gId4VhbiSWOYjhWA6eMyCW+ro4fW+6X2Qv6f 9aQpjWDCkmCHtaBwQ3u3XGaeu/x/7nYZW/L1g02k7VIlqCCN0stbPZpFvW4qUt8I IcLJjR7iZfxCXrMVSvmJGAoo9zOerujELfYN628mc6/CW30PDSTnaqSMsxqlZhDu iyVbomJ54CC0mFRBjPzyOjMXtfeEQJ5YAYcpeiMFSj8PrFoSSwm3ec6BoExGclU0 3870ubaqIeItn/I1jTZvE3wtJLh9myJBDtveuII7HT8pRYdATm80/Oqg56XxmLCA AWnfNEAlfLTeQtS+NDyjt/EAOVRS2IREYUpdOlB1fuXygzwSUWDk4UUbry1niL+i lfhUfs0Ct2om8+baQV8reQGLSrnA0GA+L2YpshdMvoBOGgwRMbJZgzmbTzWD19j+ yWqtE+5xl/br9FihxkfudE9wpPJuQ6AafWNW6uhq8RZt2qJooZM7D7/l6x+9C9xY DzadB0MRajS0nniKTGGUAEfVi8PjVpPSjEXt+VbP9DRL4hJQslkqkspr79OpERrD 7S+1yRX+lCzxlrRyQlnWXyGTROhmV/tULFhIjmedFH0ec4VJbaUSnCSm/6izTUxN D6MYp1i/yJe6h429311W =y7/8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <076be697-9bb5-4461-9289-9db02c3e4b4b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291729 |
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 10:04:41 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:58:46 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > >> > > >> (snip) > > >> > > >> > Nope. Still your key: > > >> > > > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 > > >> > "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > > >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available > > >> > > > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key. > > >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. > > >> > > > >> > pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 > > >> > uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> > > >> > sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 > > >> > > > >> > pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > > >> > uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> > > >> > sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > > >> > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >> Hash: SHA512 > > >> > > >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > >> > > >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 > > >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE > > >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY > > >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c > > >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt > > >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl > > >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u > > >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj > > >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj > > >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI > > >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f > > >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 > > >> =YaAD > > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > > > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW > > > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1 > > > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR > > > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg > > > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge > > > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM > > > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR > > > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB > > > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw > > > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL > > > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI > > > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto > > > =aD9M > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping. > > > > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D > > gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > > Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD 8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D > > > > Must be a google screwup. Try a long message with hard returns before > > 80 character mark and see if it signs properly. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Yeah, I was actually doing that before I saw this post show up. I'm going to try another long line here to see if it breaks again... pretty sure it will. I don't think this was happening on the iMac, I reposted that first post and it had some long lines in it. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbVSAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dMIIP/0Y6N+98Y3OpFaql442Ysgl0 > w9osZ439x3jnCUGLUjBM5GhGwdm9gId4VhbiSWOYjhWA6eMyCW+ro4fW+6X2Qv6f > 9aQpjWDCkmCHtaBwQ3u3XGaeu/x/7nYZW/L1g02k7VIlqCCN0stbPZpFvW4qUt8I > IcLJjR7iZfxCXrMVSvmJGAoo9zOerujELfYN628mc6/CW30PDSTnaqSMsxqlZhDu > iyVbomJ54CC0mFRBjPzyOjMXtfeEQJ5YAYcpeiMFSj8PrFoSSwm3ec6BoExGclU0 > 3870ubaqIeItn/I1jTZvE3wtJLh9myJBDtveuII7HT8pRYdATm80/Oqg56XxmLCA > AWnfNEAlfLTeQtS+NDyjt/EAOVRS2IREYUpdOlB1fuXygzwSUWDk4UUbry1niL+i > lfhUfs0Ct2om8+baQV8reQGLSrnA0GA+L2YpshdMvoBOGgwRMbJZgzmbTzWD19j+ > yWqtE+5xl/br9FihxkfudE9wpPJuQ6AafWNW6uhq8RZt2qJooZM7D7/l6x+9C9xY > DzadB0MRajS0nniKTGGUAEfVi8PjVpPSjEXt+VbP9DRL4hJQslkqkspr79OpERrD > 7S+1yRX+lCzxlrRyQlnWXyGTROhmV/tULFhIjmedFH0ec4VJbaUSnCSm/6izTUxN > D6MYp1i/yJe6h429311W > =y7/8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Weird, that long one worked.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e604e3c2-7e77-419f-8f0c-3e7df086da3f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291730 |
On Monday, 27 April 2015 04:06:05 UTC, Steve Carroll wrote: > Weird, that long one worked. Not surprised you are used to the short one failing, "Tater Tot".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgnbvhg8.efa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291730 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 10:04:41 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:58:46 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> > >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> > >> >> > >> (snip) >> > >> >> > >> > Nope. Still your key: >> > >> > >> > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> > >> > "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> > >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> > >> > >> > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key. >> > >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> > >> > >> > >> > pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> > >> > uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> > >> > sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> > >> > >> > >> > pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> > >> > uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> > >> > sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> > >> >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > >> Hash: SHA512 >> > >> >> > >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> > >> >> > >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 >> > >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE >> > >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY >> > >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c >> > >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt >> > >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl >> > >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u >> > >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj >> > >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj >> > >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI >> > >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f >> > >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 >> > >> =YaAD >> > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > > Hash: SHA512 >> > >> > > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF? >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> > >> > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW >> > > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1 >> > > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR >> > > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg >> > > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge >> > > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM >> > > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR >> > > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB >> > > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw >> > > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL >> > > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI >> > > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto >> > > =aD9M >> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping. >> > >> > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D >> > gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! >> > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. >> > Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD 8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D >> > >> > Must be a google screwup. Try a long message with hard returns before >> > 80 character mark and see if it signs properly. >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Yeah, I was actually doing that before I saw this post show up. I'm going to try another long line here to see if it breaks again... pretty sure it will. I don't think this was happening on the iMac, I reposted that first post and it had some long lines in it. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbVSAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dMIIP/0Y6N+98Y3OpFaql442Ysgl0 >> w9osZ439x3jnCUGLUjBM5GhGwdm9gId4VhbiSWOYjhWA6eMyCW+ro4fW+6X2Qv6f >> 9aQpjWDCkmCHtaBwQ3u3XGaeu/x/7nYZW/L1g02k7VIlqCCN0stbPZpFvW4qUt8I >> IcLJjR7iZfxCXrMVSvmJGAoo9zOerujELfYN628mc6/CW30PDSTnaqSMsxqlZhDu >> iyVbomJ54CC0mFRBjPzyOjMXtfeEQJ5YAYcpeiMFSj8PrFoSSwm3ec6BoExGclU0 >> 3870ubaqIeItn/I1jTZvE3wtJLh9myJBDtveuII7HT8pRYdATm80/Oqg56XxmLCA >> AWnfNEAlfLTeQtS+NDyjt/EAOVRS2IREYUpdOlB1fuXygzwSUWDk4UUbry1niL+i >> lfhUfs0Ct2om8+baQV8reQGLSrnA0GA+L2YpshdMvoBOGgwRMbJZgzmbTzWD19j+ >> yWqtE+5xl/br9FihxkfudE9wpPJuQ6AafWNW6uhq8RZt2qJooZM7D7/l6x+9C9xY >> DzadB0MRajS0nniKTGGUAEfVi8PjVpPSjEXt+VbP9DRL4hJQslkqkspr79OpERrD >> 7S+1yRX+lCzxlrRyQlnWXyGTROhmV/tULFhIjmedFH0ec4VJbaUSnCSm/6izTUxN >> D6MYp1i/yJe6h429311W >> =y7/8 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Weird, that long one worked. Yeah I get a good sig too. Still think google is doing it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bbvhgu83.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291720 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > (snip) >> Nope. Still your key: >> >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> >> You are encrypting to your own public key. >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> >> pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> >> pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 > =YaAD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" Google may have mangled the message with the long line. Try signing something short. Let's just make sure the signing part works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3867f168-0977-441f-a7e7-c6b435835be3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291722 |
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > > (snip) > > >> Nope. Still your key: > >> > >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 > >> "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available > >> > >> You are encrypting to your own public key. > >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. > >> > >> pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 > >> uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >> sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 > >> > >> pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > >> uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> > >> sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 > > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE > > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY > > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c > > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt > > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl > > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u > > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj > > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj > > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI > > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f > > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 > > =YaAD > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D > gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > > Google may have mangled the message with the long line. Try signing > something short. Let's just make sure the signing part works. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 It worked from the iMac, this is the MBP. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbOUAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dhWsQALoWpBSlJ7Lp2zwa17dFWtD4 62f6nRbrRTFHeuTDL1nO0rvdb/GUTQrViI5n+fSIeQYOZpiN1u5L0b/t8U55LJzu tzzW7dfWGf4VVrhRCCNrkJtiR5RYT2KlCeJGtibP5AK6vUacOC4A7MM3I+vifn2g gKr2cGmq5Wf98qJfy1ZD5956fx0W1NbBzpl0KgoGWW09WXgxqyIRwnxwzvpQ+s/J w55bGug3r2aVvhJmsGpayxjru2ibQYIxgrF+aLXf5CLF0CTqO0lW0p8DC93Y3G/3 91wN4UK9wGQmjsqjpc8GIVu3LZ2kt740j7VcD+zFobnq30nEsBo5YbzW80RpUFbU 2Z3k9Stqvb7X/TkRDGIZoO+F89DGYeSCJrpPqYcOXpBIIKoaIeADYSPoJNH1sOYt x+QC5F/LmxVvZTQI9IiqB1aoOUzuAEi+qfOU92k+tGHQ/TvBrOLo2koagDhnJOLE yYMQZ5C9iYZvTbibbXrneJRFSRdbNFuxrQDsuwCKeghy6wGAuiGYgJQ/lov6VyF5 uCKn695qLqdEUrNaMddk9873m1nMdcQqzoIVQnNpiAtxWwGPC1JDNfQe94ssBuQZ 34iWu5u4gtVFTF1qRtvqZtgqR1X+nAihSQittG7I+4h4+W5yVtuecSz5SIN8oDN2 ZglIivJgCSfnAKia+1dk =i1Ja -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgnvbhf73.kdsfu@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291724 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> > (snip) >> >> >> Nope. Still your key: >> >> >> >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> >> "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> >> >> >> You are encrypting to your own public key. >> >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> >> >> >> pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> >> uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> >> sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> >> >> >> pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> >> sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA512 >> >> > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 >> > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE >> > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY >> > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c >> > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt >> > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl >> > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u >> > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj >> > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj >> > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI >> > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f >> > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 >> > =YaAD >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D >> gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> >> Google may have mangled the message with the long line. Try signing >> something short. Let's just make sure the signing part works. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > It worked from the iMac, this is the MBP. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbOUAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dhWsQALoWpBSlJ7Lp2zwa17dFWtD4 > 62f6nRbrRTFHeuTDL1nO0rvdb/GUTQrViI5n+fSIeQYOZpiN1u5L0b/t8U55LJzu > tzzW7dfWGf4VVrhRCCNrkJtiR5RYT2KlCeJGtibP5AK6vUacOC4A7MM3I+vifn2g > gKr2cGmq5Wf98qJfy1ZD5956fx0W1NbBzpl0KgoGWW09WXgxqyIRwnxwzvpQ+s/J > w55bGug3r2aVvhJmsGpayxjru2ibQYIxgrF+aLXf5CLF0CTqO0lW0p8DC93Y3G/3 > 91wN4UK9wGQmjsqjpc8GIVu3LZ2kt740j7VcD+zFobnq30nEsBo5YbzW80RpUFbU > 2Z3k9Stqvb7X/TkRDGIZoO+F89DGYeSCJrpPqYcOXpBIIKoaIeADYSPoJNH1sOYt > x+QC5F/LmxVvZTQI9IiqB1aoOUzuAEi+qfOU92k+tGHQ/TvBrOLo2koagDhnJOLE > yYMQZ5C9iYZvTbibbXrneJRFSRdbNFuxrQDsuwCKeghy6wGAuiGYgJQ/lov6VyF5 > uCKn695qLqdEUrNaMddk9873m1nMdcQqzoIVQnNpiAtxWwGPC1JDNfQe94ssBuQZ > 34iWu5u4gtVFTF1qRtvqZtgqR1X+nAihSQittG7I+4h4+W5yVtuecSz5SIN8oDN2 > ZglIivJgCSfnAKia+1dk > =i1Ja > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Good sig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <942977b6-ac12-4024-b05a-3efd3ecab157@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291722 |
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > > (snip) > > >> Nope. Still your key: > >> > >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 > >> "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available > >> > >> You are encrypting to your own public key. > >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. > >> > >> pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 > >> uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> > >> sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 > >> > >> pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > >> uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> > >> sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 > > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE > > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY > > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c > > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt > > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl > > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u > > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj > > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj > > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI > > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f > > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 > > =YaAD > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D > gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" > > Google may have mangled the message with the long line. Try signing > something short. Let's just make sure the signing part works. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Here, I'll force line breaks (Lloyd would love it). Just to see if that was the case. It didn't seem to matter on the iMac for some reason... but I think you're right. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbQsAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dcdMP/iEu9K33/dyiYKJ420M8b/6Q D0CDx29qIbC9CQP/E8Qj3DEmKkGx+kVZMxrxnYVmXToxnub+rMTeVEpReqLfVmF7 XJeeoVoZ6k9ckx8VXlH/Ki8GTmYsmvzvld7G9IWzmxyEXrVUU2yL3MXb2XTlgE+g BlqKJSjKOUOVFv9+ZRHUnLL00eEffoyMRmkk6/YMs4CZ1uS6ZbpLEQZcoP3QkdR0 ZnxDLl4TkjJjauf+MaNGQjKkjalWZuYep2U2kFj5mXAXztID/8kMNcR2UpXZNbvF efcBljx97GtRyX+vPaG9ZI+JItwSjW2RuHdcc5NmVMymkk/ITN7jCvt6YbrcqI1b 6whd+DCAZxdmIQO72F0eDw4YzK421AjOJHGwhoxkCKzKecOwrXpvixSOcbRb5UTW 1jdPQXXNtxUgm21kLJ2fSiMnvhGZymVz/BSQE2185rhXeM7PPEIeQuH88HzuTHUI qHZUbgvAQiJ15wpuuOm16iJ+9wshqoB15ZqoC5JvAWkPcFN8lUcyJdLPsO5mBcQj v/MSgfCyonFCp3iRbVnxYW7/CUG1pvK4LyDdt3zRvU5yXyLqA7ueno9UngbYDOkO jMC8VLlFEauC9tXtsKPGSj8mK9tlgokxEevOCgk/sHaoOp/kBDx+DOh2dvgpmZYF AeHFMT+Cls+7LdAlcQQP =71Yv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mmbnjc9e.ki@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291726 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> > (snip) >> >> >> Nope. Still your key: >> >> >> >> gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> >> "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> >> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> >> >> >> You are encrypting to your own public key. >> >> You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> >> >> >> pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> >> uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> >> sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> >> >> >> pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> >> sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA512 >> >> > I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 >> > v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE >> > pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY >> > ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c >> > INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt >> > +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl >> > jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u >> > QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj >> > 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj >> > I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI >> > VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f >> > DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 >> > =YaAD >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:37:27 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D >> gpg: BAD signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> >> Google may have mangled the message with the long line. Try signing >> something short. Let's just make sure the signing part works. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > Here, I'll force line breaks (Lloyd would love it). Just > to see if that was the case. It didn't seem to matter > on the iMac for some reason... but I think you're right. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbQsAAoJEC03b6bOr/+dcdMP/iEu9K33/dyiYKJ420M8b/6Q > D0CDx29qIbC9CQP/E8Qj3DEmKkGx+kVZMxrxnYVmXToxnub+rMTeVEpReqLfVmF7 > XJeeoVoZ6k9ckx8VXlH/Ki8GTmYsmvzvld7G9IWzmxyEXrVUU2yL3MXb2XTlgE+g > BlqKJSjKOUOVFv9+ZRHUnLL00eEffoyMRmkk6/YMs4CZ1uS6ZbpLEQZcoP3QkdR0 > ZnxDLl4TkjJjauf+MaNGQjKkjalWZuYep2U2kFj5mXAXztID/8kMNcR2UpXZNbvF > efcBljx97GtRyX+vPaG9ZI+JItwSjW2RuHdcc5NmVMymkk/ITN7jCvt6YbrcqI1b > 6whd+DCAZxdmIQO72F0eDw4YzK421AjOJHGwhoxkCKzKecOwrXpvixSOcbRb5UTW > 1jdPQXXNtxUgm21kLJ2fSiMnvhGZymVz/BSQE2185rhXeM7PPEIeQuH88HzuTHUI > qHZUbgvAQiJ15wpuuOm16iJ+9wshqoB15ZqoC5JvAWkPcFN8lUcyJdLPsO5mBcQj > v/MSgfCyonFCp3iRbVnxYW7/CUG1pvK4LyDdt3zRvU5yXyLqA7ueno9UngbYDOkO > jMC8VLlFEauC9tXtsKPGSj8mK9tlgokxEevOCgk/sHaoOp/kBDx+DOh2dvgpmZYF > AeHFMT+Cls+7LdAlcQQP > =71Yv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Good sig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D162E69C.4AD26%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #291694 |
On 4/26/15, 5:47 PM, in article ngh584.5ra@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> What are the chances that a small U.S. company like this is a TOR relay? >> Seems odd to me. > > Haven't we been over this before? > They are a hosting company. > They have a /19 block of IP addresses. That is a big ass block. > BTW, I can't trust your key at this point. You'll have to convince > me it's you somehow. You should at least have signed a message stating your > intent to change your key before changing it. LOL! I bet even if he starts using a key he changes it from time to time. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8f2f435e-2d80-44f6-8c44-53d3fb4a0df8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291687 |
On Monday, 27 April 2015 00:02:56 UTC, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 5:32:07 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > (snip) > > > It should just showup in a gui frontend. In the gpg command line, > > type "showphoto" at the "Command>" prompt. > > Sorry for the repost but I'm going to test something here: > > Can this post have come through TOR? > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/TpIhDmzpHNY/FS1VeFIaXdAJ > > > Header info... > NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.126.110.113 Are you fucking serious? http://whois.domaintools.com/209.126.110.113 ncc-1701-d.tor-exit.network You need to know if a post sent through a tor-exit could have come through TOR. Is it possible for your IQ to drop any lower? > hQIMA77UUE4Kmty+ARAAjVDvNc9aHHTn6LRPYcbZGzGbmuU1llBjg4cI7Q3wkRlt > 9D4UVE6MoEncfuEE/5vLaLYV6oFJ39OGfiGtAUq07HOh3fAaYoyDcFwxr1b5Y7aX > sbmHvNv9uFHeEVJuSelrPhtUqDmtE6w59s0z0sNkBsXD85dDWjDqCyv1LiI2KiKY > TOHlkWmIHc0w2r2s00EDcOZKqTlZ2Hmkp/soJIvyvuoGpgYnZ3Xm+7MRKQFxbRgU > FoNlEAHcQCnZjcMrzWGT0qUHzD7SOTaTCeqjIVXRNS4ao6XzzpH/flIr02cUdZAh > CSFFEs4mYwJG9nLS6EJC9y8mAASOeYUvEk4FIHDFy9/reZNyQgi9reMqYztZocvK > N3yDVZCBWMnl1SNX1bhdP3y0Z7Pddr0+UCGQEXxrWRSQV9mbheXBvuF3N6ZrKAXX > OYbqATX4zNJ1KgEXEbn1U9F6OEdrMSlSWM6c2RgyPNxx9+UADHxE3ZCzeXyYsr8Y > 422bftu3OoESRDavQYU6/MGpv9pWqRJ4jUGjVPRcpUaa1I+CO2gVowSsc8Tc73tM > T5tIHcNrOErMR3A30c8/DMmaAxu6TuZ6SwHsqSwHcMb9D3LWh8GDWnA+vOWsLs/A > ca+P65yCN5i2Y5KummJrr5tViAFDBPnAVNKiXLBnC+jYjiSE1HKOt3Q7/lGemBvS > 6gH2E5n2nQCyvIIoAMOMML5rAaZSRngBDvcizelK1gMIE0eB326FHXmDsfwkFnXg > DPV+s8nuh+p+QG8nmZMxkearnv/3oWGoV/CKEvQKHGhZQyAlrpC21JCgePOyC2wH > MXl3Ze0V4DWm+2AMyUqBaVU9rvt3lrQFn/9/BHOgy3gvX6RxVkGwf55+a97VXvjl > D4Nfl7GU5l5Pv5tNjBOWGRykEAoV9nLGBqOPCxkD+I4F7qQ/dXBUt42gfR739T3M > tyV0V1BSU8YYoC5KhETL+i4Jdw7UyxD7jEJfDVNsmHAPWqoHGnWOaP5qftxkr42q > ODj0fhKpT+y3a4Y+Uhf8CJykWLATIVu4Tb531CRBtPeXuyOZR9u/yekhwaQVNKxk > UElSCJyId1nr05/V9WBqKMYSLPquOx0t2Jqk1npVNdPMIkQyM1aj8SWXFXQa+5x3 > RwvmCTqKBNQXv4XgqXVBfhRvN/kg+8Qjlz2loHnwijWRLUYv3pjGHhZP6t+wN3cf > olswUXFhbtULes/sXQGbaCK918eSteBSBKUcEE3HchVu9jYQImklXi+YpVRVayOe > GY3Y1lH1kNDn6FPHX2xSiyx+Xu4ZOuICIB0mp6kf120Ie2Nz7jQODIUgAIvFq7dz > dg2/lrVL3+uuDoSD+5CmvUQ1qaK/tLbwBd5Is7kUkt++mW7VqtU1Ow2M5cuHtjYM > 3boxxlVR/cWLYAEkDfCQ4qetIpnQZ9AyZh9kw1UprMcWqySY1b7DSKDLXcGcmo5b > 3fLJzdOuWveaJOFlCsNWjETNfkj6JDfuyoVwIsN+v7pNAhM8CkRnHHfb9lDPo57Y > vjKgOauFLlP0Ei4HOoLkw8kmpT0ZBxiJxv2zpwMWyqtX43c6c1ce/VE8ltcoBXto > 8eHFGUiShdxZ17A3aKw7FvY0AvG06IPrByyfOu6ajuFOTTC198WUeRdAuIYrNNOG > Q2Ah61DekXINjoVd8xLzTLe33V/qv14oH+2/F/f+SE3d4hMpGDjgDUmmblrYNctJ > NiGPcPUTRxc/cEfTnfsuS2oV2gljxXTyE923LIG90lX2iaHnTyaZKkCvmLRoBID6 > NMCZFZ5W6zNgrEg/UM+7E4B6iP8GeHxjEA7oQlDwCbCu39Oa9lUO8Qgxd1x2WL4X > AZHeZTmN/dsXEfaIxvHwSjOflcheoIy2V3pi7h+gETkdUHg/Qoz4fiACd1CUKrEx > hAamyoynKX24EVlUizgBzuBf0HY84UY8/yyA7K67gMydGJZYwLKwa6g/5F26AC7I > yjrK88y61goa2Al1fcp1qsnLs9Cw/ZN2PkWbPzbYZFGjU81ndssTYRROrTpLN9hO > lS6qqMpJOPG0DHiVkw1fHufAU3KNbOoGgQ0kry7+qRYotX/JMaVZnP5OKLdwNo2i > Yk8/B6uLwl4i0lxfI6pCOzpPUwA2mS8hbhWUepHgizL+SGdAwgp/Y/ISaw1Xg8Ew > NZR+CVGpMMVf3wL5ntPcmLoAtDxBziVUZCqwLzd8KExcAQVgruQa9U+fZAVsQb7H > +srrJ2nBI9n/FxKse0fbIihgmn7dddtZQa2UbzrfCg6wVL/nIpd5avMvuuplwr+e > SZt+apklicXkM2kqEkG9eZ9D3BocmqaXqAfZ/E4IJRGAxXZY49Ymqix9IxRjEuDl > qyWS1IHk/TZPEJyFJSOWRtnYRVmQzlipSZHjPAcYZKKXZ7L8dST6Dq+NIhmJLDA/ > beV/BZjq > =Gobu For a Usenet message. Fuck all. This is the biggest waste of bandwidth I have seen. Fucktard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D162F15A.4AD2F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #291704 |
On 4/26/15, 7:11 PM, in article 8f2f435e-2d80-44f6-8c44-53d3fb4a0df8@googlegroups.com, "tmelmosfire" <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, 27 April 2015 00:02:56 UTC, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 5:32:07 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >>> It should just showup in a gui frontend. In the gpg command line, >>> type "showphoto" at the "Command>" prompt. >> >> Sorry for the repost but I'm going to test something here: >> >> Can this post have come through TOR? >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/TpIhDmzpHNY >> /FS1VeFIaXdAJ >> >> >> Header info... > >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.126.110.113 > > Are you fucking serious? > > http://whois.domaintools.com/209.126.110.113 > > ncc-1701-d.tor-exit.network > > You need to know if a post sent through a tor-exit could have come through > TOR. > > Is it possible for your IQ to drop any lower? He is pretending to not know... as a way to pretend he did not send the message. About as transparent as one can be. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D162CCC3.4AD18%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #291666 |
On 4/26/15, 3:40 PM, in article nvbhf84.gjja3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > owl@thinkpad:~$ cat steve_post > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Now we know that, for all the crowing he's done on this topic, the 'IT Master' > doesn't know how to do this. It literally takes a couple seconds to highlight > text and 'sign' it. I'm not going to pretend you didn't square me away on this > stuff and I appreciate it. Snit has this thread to follow and can start to > sound like he has a clue from here on out... but he missed that opportunity > when it mattered ;) > > (cue up another feeble, face saving attempt by the 'IT Master') Is Carroll really pretending I *owe* him help now. Good grief. He really is pathetic. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <98e3e415-14b9-4c67-a7a5-6f551201be1a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #291690 |
On Monday, 27 April 2015 00:11:43 UTC, Snit wrote: > On 4/26/15, 3:40 PM, in article nvbhf84.gjja3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > owl@thinkpad:~$ cat steve_post > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Now we know that, for all the crowing he's done on this topic, the 'IT Master' > > doesn't know how to do this. It literally takes a couple seconds to highlight > > text and 'sign' it. I'm not going to pretend you didn't square me away on this > > stuff and I appreciate it. Snit has this thread to follow and can start to > > sound like he has a clue from here on out... but he missed that opportunity > > when it mattered ;) > > > > (cue up another feeble, face saving attempt by the 'IT Master') > > Is Carroll really pretending I *owe* him help now. > > Good grief. > > He really is pathetic. Never used it but damned does it seem hard. You two are both on Macs. http://support.gpgtools.org/kb/gpgservices-faq/how-do-i-activate-gpgservices His dipship son Ryan could figure it out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nvjjkf93.ajdei3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #291646 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 1:55:16 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > (snip) >> > How do I sign it (I've never used this)? >> >> Compose a message as a text file, or if replying to a message, >> include the parts you are replying to (with delimiters of course - >> you may have to add these yourself). Assuming filename "message.txt": >> >> gpg --output signed_message.txt --clearsign message.txt >> >> Then you can paste the contents of "signed_message.txt" into >> google's input window. Google may or may not mangle it, so this >> could fail. Try reposting my signed message through google and >> we'll see what happens to it. > Here are the contents: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > This is a signing test. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPUcAAAoJEKLThH5e1B4r/8oH/2NuIb5h5PqoDhwXeGdQz9/D > c6zpKqaLTdPXowVekEmS5CEbQKUBY8hokmaYGOEMaa3DMefIHN38YqWn5vRZ/AFC > 4cYPmjgNepDCRn1t1L7gYFxBAuuSvcKiMpbVj3AZ6EFt4XLHsWFF13ojof6PyyBG > F9OAlx/jI80PzctWEhMqk2U24OGPMTgkED487ZGtkp2IHHPTLnwG2iwWewecFRUG > 9VKO/Fo/nRy5+CsLXDC+Svma/TOhuz7P9utDLiKO+bVTegoSJhPUc5MtvzKHsORi > +8RMcXtrqkMZ8NxOpY2Ble9Q3SvCoCBGeUKJEpe8ubkAGAT6AaxLuUKVMgLF/Jg= > =WB15 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > How do I make sure I give out my public key and not my private key? Is it the one that has headers/footers like yours? Ex: gpg --output yours.asc --armor --export you@your.address > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > I 'exported it and it has those (with all the text) in a .asc file. That's your public key. You have to use --export-secret-keys to export your private key. ... >> > I've never used this so please bear with me. I took the part starting with: >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- >> >> > ... and ending with... >> >> > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- >> >> > ...and I pasted it into a text file. Then I did what I assumed was the next step (based on looking at one I generated) and I named the text file: >> >> > D83A7ECF.asc >> >> > I then imported it into my GPG keychain and I got an entry that read: >> > >> > Type: pub >> > Name: owl(cola) >> >> Did you add the "cola" part? >> I had a key with "owl (cola)", but generated a new one as "owl (usenet)" >> which I thought was the one I posted. >> >> > Email: your email >> > Date: today's date >> > Key ID: A number that is presumably yours >> > Validity: Shows 2 yellow bars (mine has 4 green bars). >> >> > How do I verify that this is you who wrote this post by using this key? >> >> Copy the following from my post: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> a message from me >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVPS/NAAoJEAJKDhzYOn7PMC8H/1Mu7Pa9zmW/pAKhO9KFivCY >> 4r+DSaFoQMlcb4BHhtnQdB2waKQH9SWe6WLmhsvhVAsoFs6w/qCaGo9tqHYbm8WV >> TOk7nPLJMDiH9jnHCDsuFPnrWm2vQn/r7c7dwlvXv9YGFgm0plfdw1qRg/5+Tl9J >> vWiwct3/oFm63dUL7KxmNm/9X5+rI/elwrkm4D70vrMd9J/eBuhe8ULBkLBWqzDS >> UJhbcHVJoCPHz5AkIMdXnIBJLO56Lx0xrwg5zHLBsBlFLnOHZUCPD9b1OTNkHuJ/ >> 6+hqEUpAfhzF4ytly7mfp9aihvU/cY8+aORXjvOBkuGEfs61oGPcO5DwKw6owtM= >> =P3mC >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Post your public key here and I'll verify. >> Save it as whatever.txt >> then >> $ gpg --verify whatever.txt > It reads: > "Verification failed > Unexpected GPG signature status 9" Not sure unless it a mangled copy. > BTW, above, you asked: "Did you add the "cola" part? " > I didn't add anything, that is what showed up. Doh! Wrong public key. I thought something was wrong with that "cola" label. delete the one I gave you and import this one: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) mQENBFU9LLkBCACuzwGUszZXZFRWj0uLnEgbBSesn3j0i7dVyYD35tBJRXjH+udU SZb7E9lQfzRw1vbU0UZC3aCX6OuIeeserrzqQ5WlWSCw7KiavSd6bdK3ub9RLYLC HIMJK5RqNL/jY0l65qkLyXDfXixP1jLz2M5w/mGsi2tAvjN6m9ViSxXN4xttvrSt vFTCRFebM4tFXxxBz6WrXx0ye/zSVeNmTESiPAywOEAQBO1rZDaZ+N7pEHPpymYY mXG0eB9PKKSNOCBD58UzbIe26XyVsszl0SSOa8nVNofdQQwKTj2L3i29bUhEBY31 LssF4xiBL1DDbhPDGuQX5j4Hh6xcg/y1m+ppABEBAAG0Im93bCAodXNlbmV0KSA8 b3dsQHJvb2Z0b3AuaW52YWxpZD6JATgEEwECACIFAlU9LLkCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEAJKDhzYOn7Pz7YH+gKlKvm4bbHGdOq8tBFTFSz4 XcamtMR7n4e+ng5cndvqFKjXHuEr1Ty+ldqE5dSX6BUsmgxst1C1rw1pgDs0Rdx2 i6asCddV/JXlVwakScOlICcDqBKgRFxkYGbTrGshUxtTl2ob+5TvKBWfNK23lhLc ToBu+3Z4z49js1lrp+YLtv+YZOxo1rTaE0aVHKzsUaKdllyJvdhNB3lbJUP26BXD K341JpgKcaLot0Lmha8t0CZBPYHbB1wJcSmBWLGMBOmHc9BpPkyuMG7wQJVQlyyj 2uWyF/ocdZKAjtTM1rdDhd7/M+EfPexRnU4Z96DjXqVK3yvIWLgZ9vWi6kUwgWa5 AQ0EVT0suQEIAOzaPa5vH/50v0U1sPJHAtp088MiZ8XYDuIGxFStUbHhchmnNPSq IYDhihMnY4BEQcaAjIrTwErt2sUWqZpIL/IGNwIKmUGwIXW5FcS5UQmo46qiy5hb l81U46QPaBxw0Oqe3IBXZ59rXIPDozrxoKVldgCn9dnTMZqQQPqidpVL7rE00h58 3SIeHub/c+O8UaOQ0ysKyH+4wWYfl9EXCMBG7vEbFs/5w3DPGsgbOCy39MuAmFfM Xiljx3GUwBZoLtgF1bwIxtmLKloKmBH29Y5UzHFEuaD0v4WGpiD/Hkt4tRJo3NHC eliFJjPKY/xjSR/+9PmxNJO4RYbG5aOpFQUAEQEAAYkBHwQYAQIACQUCVT0suQIb DAAKCRACSg4c2Dp+z2mCB/4ylZgalgJndcF6F/zZzi3+Px5bpVsSMC+b8yc6zJiX tYzuC1dnxCj2O4N5hH5nFTqTN3TfVFYwwZnF2vrzmRCkH7BOt6CZKTnwpDGFNaWO VyZlByjFcqQ86NO5KgqssmTPvNgnZLWM190F2h8n4+UG1kNit0pVuL4vFEHeS7/g DCI4fU6JfDdzg/8uDDgN5IaSm7JbuFwyL64SFzjifm7Q/d+ZCDvEoNiz957O7JxA 6h5a3VQ8l0u0FRy/QcyEqkxOIJnAvmLY5wCkqjNKtAm8Uf6IRFlwhJUX6ZCJfr8B mYO5q4ycu2vzlpL0C78g1SEPTPMM4tGwspqezKoKn+FZ =iHw/ -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D1628D37.4ACDF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #291638 |
On 4/26/15, 11:49 AM, in article hbvj83.gko8a2@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 11:30:29 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 1:18:20 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > ... > > >>>>>> ... >>>>> He could just sign messages with his private key and put an end to this >>>>> nonsense. >>> >>>> When Desk Rabbit suggested this awhile back I went and got the Mac version >>>> of PGP key but I see no way to 'sign' posts made via Google Groups. If a >>>> reader doesn't have the public key... >>> >>> Why wouldn't the reader have the public key? > >> Who would bother? I've never done it for usenet. > > Why would you bother? You sure seem to be bothered about "forgeries." > Isn't that enough reason to bother signing your messages and making > your public key available? While it would make it where he could still deny his non-signed posts, he would never again be able to deny his signed posts. This would mean there would be words he could not insist were not his. This is a part of his game: whenever he is called out he knows he has the option to insist it was a forged or hacked post. Signing would take that away. He will never do it. >>> That's what it's for. Make >>> it public. Put it on the web and link to it in the message itself if >>> necessary. >>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/vDNdq6Aj6 >>>> EQ/nQ3pffj7qu4J > >> That's not from GoogleGroups and it's probably using a newsreader app. >> Inferior as it may be to a dedicated app, I've gotten used to it now and, >> being browser based, it also works well on mobile. > > Have you tried posting a signed message through google? There are also mobile Usenet clients. His real reason is he wants to be able to deny *any* message he has posted as being from a forger or having been "hacked" by his ex-girlfriend (and me, of course). ... >>> Again, is google mangling messages so that they fail a signature check? > >> Dunno... I see no facility for signing it... if I could figure out how to do >> it I would. > > Try pasting a signed message into google groups compose window. Carroll has denied knowing how to install the Tor Browser he pointed to (it requires nothing more than opening the icon you download and then dragging the application). Next he might deny knowing how to copy and paste. ... -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web