Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291725
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) |
| Date | 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <nnghdi3.a3r3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <hgud0.3fap@rooftop.invalid> <e187bacc-ccf5-48ca-bf4e-25e482e7f892@googlegroups.com> <hgu03.f0a33@rooftop.invalid> <b28ad674-9e81-4075-bfd4-166dd289085d@googlegroups.com> <d2db8825-8718-4735-a2d3-89af70a5dbab@googlegroups.com> |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:38:28 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 9:21:03 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> (snip) >> >> > Nope. Still your key: >> > >> > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0A9ADCBE, created 2015-04-26 >> > "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" >> > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available >> > >> > You are encrypting to your own public key. >> > You need to either encrypt to just my public key, or add me as a recipient. >> > >> > pub 2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27 >> > uid owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid> >> > sub 2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27 >> > >> > pub 4096R/CEAFFF9D 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> > uid Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com> >> > sub 4096R/0A9ADCBE 2015-04-26 [expires: 2019-04-26] >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> I just put the software (and key) on my old MBP, which I'm sending this post from. I thought I did add you as a recipient. The box was checked to do so. >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPa73AAoJEC03b6bOr/+dLscQAIGrSYsTdMHfWL5+qQRVxzm3 >> v8LB2zhcF/pEn8J2truf0Tfw9E9GQAsEeD7C8dkTNAPhFTOPFGZ01x+wn0vKKJAE >> pvd7ESSw8etf4I3C4w9Nl6T8QXUMQaDyK1eBokiztCKGd7y6HGqworkH3KDAuBMY >> ocLuJLSVNaaBhn/D/NX13M2HUQ5tcQjXGhK2MGJZqNDbwQiAn6181T0QUMgD/86c >> INXC90ckP3dTUyQLjdJpKwvT3cMJrtzWNZZKPbRwOJoNAlaoXHTkjhFPuDs26JBt >> +qZX1GHTc6ByXGxRgY6KvmrhLiYfzoxAWolMKweXlVoRCBWX21UE4Rl98pGgQjNl >> jdpIpxNre/2qpwcZBf3SvZt5JLEnDXaI+2K1zzTqHoQtXCuQudjJ8oeg28eJD97u >> QH72rVXv/LLyzO7hcmQ1HvGQvh+xl+uEajnSaA4s6q8HgHRpfI7mQ0+wF/CCLXSj >> 8TnzzlE2/zyn71J51ZXQBhK99qj7EI9h0MNODMlgvq3edrQWFBHjXULUy/5nfhEj >> I8YYxWHnPWWc79WeNBZM05r9g4PfLS/2heseyAJxZwv9Abduf48iujbv5dA21LqI >> VN88HYYMqZopN+aAG6yntl8RGM5VAx3/5s+093/u/0m5kcIX9bpG811Fq1e1wX5f >> DkiFSenncxo6zTPm1c40 >> =YaAD >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > Why did that last one say, "Bad signature"? WTF? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVPbDqAAoJEC03b6bOr/+d10MP/A6E51Hqk70LTL86avTSAIyW > u8sNF/xtHl568zvzwyYdIhPc4H18+T1YsQbQU1AENf1LWGi8VYsYYP43WucaqGc1 > lXXwKlwcmDd+ukxQ8IAzrP/4ZOJ6md67eIVsfpBm++vSz7vkW/dS0wXUCiQnGGQR > 1PhVLpxtrZgWRWmCV5DIg3hDWVxUetQVDOr9+D8SbYrkkrkuij9T/UY1ucDQyEJg > Xz0YcjJdztsPtQfFTF/NORrC2Grwb0UtHM8oXVSW6JXgpLjEfmKLslnTGJzGajge > nDd54NGMvVIvWai5qpyvxKVizcowHfhg1rbyocxZ1LxRgq1oSGjcPYzmQzVMyVDM > Nq751JhwP6pi0iefG9RDryYsS8S8YSQMj5pXDOzOF3gYGJDBYrlASVGqgcatXdXR > TWVB7e/Kw8lNNnpRzhib7wBOmADi18TlE4a4DZmLUEzGgA4DjgIVggzu+ZCgy1MB > MZhpbuVWZ/zvWwYVfMY8Oe25rQWqwm7abz1XwgxIuDGsCq8x4D8NHqVAwl/9itWw > PeL/avuqKLiyWWTmGT2tIEuc31hMS8YtmQCzoLsksYY+tDk4UaabQmCEhjvrrzeL > swcE5Wr3tricP9TMmQResYL8uGM+0TDnfdGgh23G99WT9ADpKC+4GpQMnDjXlODI > e3lxfWJdwHu7s3lSyTto > =aD9M > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- I get a good sig on this one, but it has no line-wrapping. gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Apr 2015 11:45:46 PM EDT using RSA key ID CEAFFF9D gpg: Good signature from "Steve Carroll (Do you hear me now?) <fretwizzer@gmail.com>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3A0C 0D5C E590 4EE5 C3AD 8047 2D37 6FA6 CEAF FF9D Must be a google screwup. Try a long message with hard returns before 80 character mark and see if it signs properly.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700
csiph-web