Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291650

Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit)
Date 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
Organization ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID <nvjjkf93.ajdei3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <c447e2cc-b509-4648-afc2-9a9d70e378d2@googlegroups.com> <hbvj83.gko8a2@rooftop.invalid> <990eab8b-bae7-49b8-9cc3-0f23c1cd1bbb@googlegroups.com> <bvjf93.ajfi2@rooftop.invalid> <7d4e03c8-0145-49a1-880e-602579bc3813@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 1:55:16 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:

> (snip)

>> > How do I sign it (I've never used this)?
>> 
>> Compose a message as a text file, or if replying to a message,
>> include the parts you are replying to (with delimiters of course -
>> you may have to add these yourself).  Assuming filename "message.txt":
>> 
>> gpg --output signed_message.txt --clearsign message.txt
>> 
>> Then you can paste the contents of "signed_message.txt" into
>> google's input window.  Google may or may not mangle it, so this
>> could fail.  Try reposting my signed message through google and
>> we'll see what happens to it.

> Here are the contents:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512

> This is a signing test.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVPUcAAAoJEKLThH5e1B4r/8oH/2NuIb5h5PqoDhwXeGdQz9/D
> c6zpKqaLTdPXowVekEmS5CEbQKUBY8hokmaYGOEMaa3DMefIHN38YqWn5vRZ/AFC
> 4cYPmjgNepDCRn1t1L7gYFxBAuuSvcKiMpbVj3AZ6EFt4XLHsWFF13ojof6PyyBG
> F9OAlx/jI80PzctWEhMqk2U24OGPMTgkED487ZGtkp2IHHPTLnwG2iwWewecFRUG
> 9VKO/Fo/nRy5+CsLXDC+Svma/TOhuz7P9utDLiKO+bVTegoSJhPUc5MtvzKHsORi
> +8RMcXtrqkMZ8NxOpY2Ble9Q3SvCoCBGeUKJEpe8ubkAGAT6AaxLuUKVMgLF/Jg=
> =WB15
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

> How do I make sure I give out my public key and not my private key? Is it the one that has headers/footers like yours? Ex:


gpg --output yours.asc --armor --export you@your.address


> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

> I 'exported it and it has those (with all the text) in a .asc file. 

That's your public key.  You have to use --export-secret-keys
to export your private key.

...

>> > I've never used this so please bear with me. I took the part starting with:
>> 
>> >  -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> 
>> > ... and ending with...
>> 
>> >  -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> 
>> > ...and I pasted it into a text file. Then I did what I assumed was the next step (based on looking at one I generated) and I named the text file:
>> 
>> > D83A7ECF.asc
>> 
>> > I then imported it into my GPG keychain and I got an entry that read:
>> >  
>> > Type: pub
>> > Name: owl(cola)
>> 
>> Did you add the "cola" part?
>> I had a key with "owl (cola)", but generated a new one as "owl (usenet)"
>> which I thought was the one I posted.
>> 
>> > Email: your email
>> > Date: today's date
>> > Key ID: A number that is presumably yours
>> > Validity: Shows 2 yellow bars (mine has 4 green bars).
>> 
>> > How do I verify that this is you who wrote this post by using this key?
>> 
>> Copy the following from my post:
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> a message from me
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>> 
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVPS/NAAoJEAJKDhzYOn7PMC8H/1Mu7Pa9zmW/pAKhO9KFivCY
>> 4r+DSaFoQMlcb4BHhtnQdB2waKQH9SWe6WLmhsvhVAsoFs6w/qCaGo9tqHYbm8WV
>> TOk7nPLJMDiH9jnHCDsuFPnrWm2vQn/r7c7dwlvXv9YGFgm0plfdw1qRg/5+Tl9J
>> vWiwct3/oFm63dUL7KxmNm/9X5+rI/elwrkm4D70vrMd9J/eBuhe8ULBkLBWqzDS
>> UJhbcHVJoCPHz5AkIMdXnIBJLO56Lx0xrwg5zHLBsBlFLnOHZUCPD9b1OTNkHuJ/
>> 6+hqEUpAfhzF4ytly7mfp9aihvU/cY8+aORXjvOBkuGEfs61oGPcO5DwKw6owtM=
>> =P3mC
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 

Post your public key here and I'll verify.

>> Save it as whatever.txt
>> then
>> $ gpg --verify whatever.txt

> It reads:

> "Verification failed
> Unexpected GPG signature status 9"

Not sure unless it a mangled copy.

> BTW, above, you asked: "Did you add the "cola" part? "

> I didn't add anything, that is what showed up.

Doh!  Wrong public key.  I thought something was wrong with that "cola"
label.

delete the one I gave you and import this one:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=iHw/
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:40 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 11:46 -0700
  Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 15:12 -0400
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:23 -0700
    Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 12:59 -0700
      Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:49 -0700
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 20:41 -0400
        Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:44 -0700
          Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 04:31 -0700
            Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:30 -0700
              Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-24 20:08 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 10:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 18:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 11:53 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-25 19:18 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-25 12:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:54 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 17:30 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 10:43 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 11:29 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 18:49 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:23 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 12:48 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:25 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 13:33 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:22 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:32 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 21:50 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:05 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:35 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 14:40 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:09 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:21 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:40 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:51 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 15:49 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 23:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 16:46 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:00 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:02 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 00:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 18:14 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:41 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:32 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 02:46 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:21 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:38 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:45 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:58 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:12 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:20 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 03:55 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:57 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:02 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 04:04 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:01 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 19:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 17:11 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 20:06 -0700
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-26 20:47 +0000
                Re: OT: IT Pros or anyone with a clue about TOR (not you Snit) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-26 12:40 -0700

csiph-web