Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #33030 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-02 19:37 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-08 05:49 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 127 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.mobile.android
Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-02 19:37 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 15:43 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-02 19:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-02 22:28 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 03:18 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 03:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-02 23:51 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 04:21 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 06:34 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-08-02 23:43 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 07:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 06:47 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 11:04 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 08:57 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:05 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-04 03:54 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-04 04:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 21:03 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 10:57 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:32 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:33 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 16:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 09:15 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:54 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:06 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-03 11:07 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 06:38 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Meanie <meanie.brat@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 16:40 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-03 19:03 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-03 15:19 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 09:37 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 10:57 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Michael Eyd <invalid@eyd.de> - 2016-08-04 13:07 +0200
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-08-04 11:01 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-04 20:13 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-04 20:17 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-05 16:51 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 00:25 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-05 22:05 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 02:46 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 00:40 -0300
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 14:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-06 10:54 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 15:14 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 15:05 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-06 15:03 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-06 15:37 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-06 19:59 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-09 23:21 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-09 16:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 14:21 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 20:27 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? joe <none@domain.invalid> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 08:37 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-10 17:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 02:41 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 00:07 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 19:00 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-14 23:35 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:10 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-15 23:51 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-15 22:11 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 06:42 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-16 19:25 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-16 19:58 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 01:21 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-16 23:11 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 16:12 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-19 19:12 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-19 14:57 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? "Jeff Gaines" <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-08-20 07:53 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-20 12:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Roy Smith <rasmith1959@live.com> - 2016-08-17 03:12 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-17 10:16 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-17 17:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-17 17:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-17 16:22 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-08-19 18:43 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-09 02:11 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-09-09 02:20 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net> - 2016-08-16 14:06 -0500
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-16 19:30 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 17:56 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-14 14:09 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 18:18 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:32 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:33 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-14 22:29 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-14 23:37 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-15 05:17 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-15 01:47 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:17 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 01:41 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 05:39 -0600
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-15 19:40 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? crankypuss <undisclosedUserid@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 05:49 -0600
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? AL <noemail@none.com> - 2016-08-16 08:46 -0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 00:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 01:11 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-16 21:35 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-16 22:01 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-10 20:47 +0700
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-08-07 01:44 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-07 03:57 -0400
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-08-07 19:48 +1000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-08-07 18:06 +0000
Re: Why would iOS be safer from spying than a well setup Android phone? Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> - 2016-08-08 05:49 +0200
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 08:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nofho5$867$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33272 |
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:37:11 -0500, joe wrote: > I think your spelling of 'primitive' should actually be 'secure' > as many of the traits you call primitive are a result of an > implementation that is more secure. I realized only recently that you Apple apologists think such unreasonable things simply because your primary motive for choosing an operating system is based on sheer unadulterated *fear*. Therefore, without any facts whatsoever, you easily fall for Mommy Apple Marketing tricks where they play all of you like a fiddle by sweetly telling you that the blue hairy monster in the closet can't get out if you simply close the closet door. Facts aren't something you know how to deal with. You listen to Mommy Apple Marketing, and you trust her. However, you can't fool someone like me who has both the primitive iOS and the more advanced Android operating system. I try the same things on both operating systems because my mobile device needs are the same irrespective of the operating system. So I know that the iOS operating system is primitive. It's nowhere near as customizable to the user as is Android. The fact is that iOS is so primitive that even I have to "just give up" on doing what I want with it. The fact is that you "just give up" so often that you don't even *think* about it anymore. You just give up all the time. For example, you simply accept that you can't possibly organize your desktop the way you want to organize it. As just one of almost a score of examples I've already provided, today I reset my Android phone to factory defaults and then I re-installed all my apps, and set up my desktop, all without using a single computer or cloud. Here is what my desktop looks like: http://i.cubeupload.com/FDrkG8.png Now, try any of *that* with the primitive iOS. You can't do it on iOS. Even "I" can't do it on iOS. That's because iOS is primitive. It has nothing to do with "security". ioS is just primitive. Period. On the primitive iOS, you have to "just give up" all the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e117diF3iqtU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #33271 |
On 2016-08-10, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > Wanna see *my* home screen on Android? > I'm not embarrassed to show it. > http://i.cubeupload.com/FDrkG8.png Your idiotic Christmas tree layout is fucking ugly; you should be embarrassed. > Try *that* on your primitive non-customizable iOS! No need to try it, and wouldn't want something that fugly anyway. Many people actually like the iOS launcher and find it plenty useful even if it doesn't fit with your idiotic "my way or you suck" rigid world view. > How do you completely eliminate the AdID on your primitive non-customizable > iOS? You haven't shown that you can completely eliminated it on Android. You hid it, and then just gave up. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 02:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noolos$10oc$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33277 |
On 10 Aug 2016 17:43:15 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Your idiotic Christmas tree layout is fucking ugly; you should be > embarrassed. I originally had a circle, with the phone in the center, and the apps ringed around it in two concentric circles, most important apps and folders in the inside. But I like the pyramid because it's the universal building block with the most-often used apps on top. Let's see what *your* desktop looks like. :) > No need to try it, and wouldn't want something that fugly anyway. There are so many things you "just can't do" on the more primitive iOS. One of them is the ability to put app icons anywhere you like. That's like being stuck in the stone age of desktop guis. Another thing you can't do on the primitive iOS is put apps icons in multiple places. Again, you're stuck in the stone age. And, another thing you have to do in the primitive iOS is build your own App Drawer app from scratch. Modern operating system launchers have all that, and (far) more. On iOS, you "just can't do it". > Many people actually like the iOS launcher and find it plenty useful even if > it doesn't fit with your idiotic "my way or you suck" rigid world view. You see? Do you see how you completely missed the point? It's *you* who has the one-button-mouse mentality. You can't see any other way of doing things but the one-button-mouse way that Apple Marketing sees fit to provide to you. Yet, you don't even realize that if we wanted to set up our systems the way you set up yours, we could. We can set them up *any* way we like. You see, we have a multi-button-mouse mentality. You are forever stuck in the rigid primitive one-button-mouse world. You even see having the ability of any solution as a drawback! That's proof positive you're stuck in the primitive one-button-mouse mentality! As a whole, iOS users can think in only single-vector solutions. And, when they see a multi-vector solution - they ridiculously deprecate it, even though it can do everything they can do - and far (far) more. >> How do you completely eliminate the AdID on your primitive non-customizable >> iOS? > > You haven't shown that you can completely eliminated it on Android. You > hid it, and then just gave up. Heh heh ... I'm trying really hard not to say how stupid you sound in your every breath. I should be more gentle with you so I will only mention that, as above, we can do *everything* you can do, and more. It's trivial for us to get rid of the AdID. You can't do it. Not only that, but you claim there are little green monsters among us (since you live in fear) and then when I say show me where you get that idea, you repeat your made-up claim that the little green monsters are among us. You provide zero proof of these little green monsters, whereas I showed exactly how to eliminate them. The reason you repeat your entirely made-up claim about the little green monsters among us is simply that you can't do it. You can't eliminate the Appleware spy id. We can.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 00:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140820160007261570%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33332 |
In article <noolos$10oc$2@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > On 10 Aug 2016 17:43:15 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > > > Your idiotic Christmas tree layout is fucking ugly; you should be > > embarrassed. > > I originally had a circle, with the phone in the center, and the apps > ringed around it in two concentric circles, most important apps and folders > in the inside. > > But I like the pyramid because it's the universal building block with the > most-often used apps on top. > > Let's see what *your* desktop looks like. > :) > > > No need to try it, and wouldn't want something that fugly anyway. > > There are so many things you "just can't do" on the more primitive iOS. > > One of them is the ability to put app icons anywhere you like. > That's like being stuck in the stone age of desktop guis. first of all it's not a desktop gui. second, while you're obsessing over how to arrange your icons in pretty shapes, ios is being used to help people do things they otherwise could not do, such as this 10 year old, who uses an iphone (not android) to get his hearing back: <http://abc7news.com/health/new-tech-stanford-help-morgan-hill-boy-get-h earing-back/1437705/> We were there as Joshua was outfitted with the Cochlear Baha 5, a cutting edge device that has allowed Joshua to hear out of both ears clearly for the very first time. The device, made for the iPhone, gives him an opportunity to use Apple technology to better his life. there's also a logic analyzer, ios only: <https://www.oscium.com/logic-analyzers/logiscope> a digital oscilloscope, ios only: <https://www.oscium.com/oscilloscopes/imso-104> and a sequencer, ios only: <http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/mobile_apps/cubasis/start.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr1t$4i6$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33334 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 00:07:26 -0400, nospam wrote: > and a sequencer, ios only: > <http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/mobile_apps/cubasis/start.html> Again, you must be used to talking to people who *believe* everything Mommy Apple Marketing tells them, because it's always going to be the case that iOS *limits* what you can do. That's because iOS is not only primitive, but limited. While I am no expert in "sequencers", a simple search for the terms in that web page you provided with the word "android" appended shows a *lot* of "sequencers" for Android. I'm not gonna read them all simply because I, myself, don't have the background to compare, but others do, so I simply provide the URLs... Music writer - Android Midi sequencer/Deep compositional tool http://www.musicalandroid.com/blog/category/sequencer 8 Great Musical Production Tools for Android https://android.appstorm.net/roundups/music-roundups/musical-production-apps-for-android/ The 10 Best Music making apps for Android http://getandroidstuff.com/the-best-music-making-apps-for-android/ Best Android Apps for Recording and Editing Music on the Go http://www.junauza.com/2014/09/best-android-apps-for-recording-and-editing-music-on-the-go.html The best Android music making apps in the world today http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/the-best-android-music-making-apps-in-the-world-today-276167 6 Pro MIDI Sequencer Apps for Android and iOS http://www.higheredtechdecisions.com/article/pro_midi_sequencer_apps_for_android_and_ios/Mobility For anything you want to do, Android will *always* have more choices than iOS will have. Fact is, it's always gonna be the case that iOS limits the user. That's not so much because iOS is primitive but because iOS limits the user's ability to get things done. On iOS, the user is used to just giving up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 19:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140820161900018650%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33351 |
In article <noqr1t$4i6$4@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > > and a sequencer, ios only: > > <http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/mobile_apps/cubasis/start.html> > > Again, you must be used to talking to people who *believe* everything Mommy > Apple Marketing tells them, because it's always going to be the case that > iOS *limits* what you can do. > > That's because iOS is not only primitive, but limited. wrong. > While I am no expert in "sequencers", a simple search for the terms in that > web page you provided with the word "android" appended shows a *lot* of > "sequencers" for Android. a simple search doesn't mean anything. what you found are crap because of audio latencies inherent to android. the latencies re getting better, but it still is worse than on ios, which is why the best audio apps are on ios, not android, even using old year old ios hardware (i.e., not top of the line). <http://www.androidauthority.com/horrendous-android-audio-latency-624171 /> Results compiled by Nervous Systems using data collected by the SuperPowered measurement application, which we talked about before, show that the most popular Android handsets are still far too slow at providing a round-trip from jack/mic to speaker for real-time audio processing. The results from the 20 most popular phones can be seen below. <http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/11/13/android-audio-latency-in-depth- its-getting-better-especially-with-the-nexus-5x-and-6p/> Unfortunately, iOS has always been way ahead of Android in terms of audio latency. Even iOS devices as old as the iPhone 4S (and much older) have average latency levels of about 7 ms. That's fifty times less than the average latency for Android devices in 2011. That much of a difference can easily translate to a comparatively horrible experience on Android, to the point where it simply became comically bad. In the video below, you can see a comparison of two drum kit apps running on both an iPad and an Android tablet on Ice Cream Sandwich. Listen out for the lag between the tap on the screen and the sound of the snare and cymbals. > I'm not gonna read them all simply because I, myself, don't have the > background to compare, but others do, so I simply provide the URLs... they don't compare. period.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr21$4i6$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33334 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 00:07:26 -0400, nospam wrote: > there's also a logic analyzer, ios only: > <https://www.oscium.com/logic-analyzers/logiscope> You must be used to talking to Apple people only. Again, you cherry pick as if you're used to dealing only with Apple owners who don't know the first thing about doublechecking their sources! Sure, for $200, "LogiScope transforms your iPhone, iPad, iPod into a 100 MHz, 16 channel logic analyzer". But, guess what? A simple search shows that far better tools exist that perform the same functionality on Android (for free!). And most work on *all* standard platforms *except* iOS! For example, here is open-source logic-analyzer software, which works on all platforms *except* iOS (i.e., Android, Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, x86, ARM, Sparc, PowerPC, etc.). https://sigrok.org/ Here, is another one that pops up early in the search, where it's cross platform (which such things should be) on Android, Linux, Windows, OSX, and, oh, BTW, not iOS unless it's jailbroken!): https://www.lab-nation.com/ So, as always, you're actually *limited* by the primitive and highly restrictive iOS operating system such that you have to pay far more just to get done what others can do for free on the more modern open operating systems. Here's an open-source 100MS/s Oscilloscope for iPad, Android and PC: http://powerelectronics.com/blog/first-100mss-open-source-oscilloscope-ipad-android-and-pc As always, you're *limited* by iOS, as explained in that last article (verbatim): "Although the required functionality (USB-OTG) is becoming a standard for Android devices the past few years, we were not able to get cooperation from Apple (yet ;). As such, our team set out to start from jailbroken iOS devices, and hack our way to the USB controller, which we eventually succeeded in. However, this means the SmartScope will only be recognized in case you apply a jailbreak patch to your iOS smartphone..." You cherry pick, but you are so used to dealing with non-technical Apple buyers that you forget that not everything Apple Marketing Mommy tells you is true. In this case of a logic analyzer, you can pay $200 for one that works with a non-jailbroken iOS device - or - for free - you can get a better one that works with Android (and every other operating system *but* iOS!). As always, the primitive iOS limits the user's ability to get things done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140820161859588478%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33352 |
In article <noqr21$4i6$5@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > > there's also a logic analyzer, ios only: > > <https://www.oscium.com/logic-analyzers/logiscope> > > You must be used to talking to Apple people only. > > Again, you cherry pick as if you're used to dealing only with Apple owners > who don't know the first thing about doublechecking their sources! > > Sure, for $200, "LogiScope transforms your iPhone, iPad, iPod into a 100 > MHz, 16 channel logic analyzer". > > But, guess what? > A simple search shows that far better tools exist that perform the same > functionality on Android (for free!). bullshit. the above product is a combination of hardware and software and nobody is giving out free hardware. > And most work on *all* standard platforms *except* iOS! > > For example, here is open-source logic-analyzer software, which works on > all platforms *except* iOS (i.e., Android, Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, > FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, x86, ARM, Sparc, PowerPC, etc.). > https://sigrok.org/ where's the hardware? > Here, is another one that pops up early in the search, where it's cross > platform (which such things should be) on Android, Linux, Windows, OSX, > and, oh, BTW, not iOS unless it's jailbroken!): > https://www.lab-nation.com/ $229, which is *more* than the one i linked, and doesn't work as well either. another fail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr25$4i6$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33334 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 00:07:26 -0400, nospam wrote: > ios is being used to help people do things they otherwise could > not do, such as this 10 year old, who uses an iphone (not android) to > get his hearing back: > <http://abc7news.com/health/new-tech-stanford-help-morgan-hill-boy-get-h > earing-back/1437705/> > We were there as Joshua was outfitted with the Cochlear Baha 5, a > cutting edge device that has allowed Joshua to hear out of both ears > clearly for the very first time. > > The device, made for the iPhone, gives him an opportunity to use > Apple technology to better his life. You always cherry pick, which is OK, but when you cherry pick, you completely ignore the other side of the coin (as if it doesn't exist). Are you so used to talking only with Apple Apologists that you never check your sources? Do you realize a search for hearing aid smartphone compatibility comes up with tons of hearing aids applications for both Android and for iOS? For example: The Top 6 Mobile Apps for Hearing Aids and Hearing Loss https://www.audicus.com/six-mobile-hearing-loss-apps/ Hearing Aids and Smart Phone Compatibility http://www.appalachianaudiology.com/hearing-aid-and-smart-phone-compatability.php ReSound Announces Smart Hearing Aid Technology for Android http://www.hearingreview.com/2015/01/resound-announces-smart-hearing-solutions-android/ Android & iOS Apps for Siemens Hearing Aids https://usa.bestsoundtechnology.com/services-information/apps/ Beltone SmartRemote App to remotely control hearing aids: https://www.beltone.com/apps/smart-remote-app.aspx Best Android apps for hearing aids: http://appcrawlr.com/android-apps/best-apps-hearing-aid etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 18:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140820161859578426%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33353 |
In article <noqr25$4i6$6@gioia.aioe.org>, Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> wrote: > > > ios is being used to help people do things they otherwise could > > not do, such as this 10 year old, who uses an iphone (not android) to > > get his hearing back: > > <http://abc7news.com/health/new-tech-stanford-help-morgan-hill-boy-get-h > > earing-back/1437705/> > > We were there as Joshua was outfitted with the Cochlear Baha 5, a > > cutting edge device that has allowed Joshua to hear out of both ears > > clearly for the very first time. > > > > The device, made for the iPhone, gives him an opportunity to use > > Apple technology to better his life. > > You always cherry pick, which is OK, but when you cherry pick, you > completely ignore the other side of the coin (as if it doesn't exist). i never said the other side doesn't exist. stop lying i said that both platforms do certain things the other can't. pick the best tool for the job. > Are you so used to talking only with Apple Apologists that you never check > your sources? > > Do you realize a search for hearing aid smartphone compatibility comes up > with tons of hearing aids applications for both Android and for iOS? you didn't even read the original article. he's not using a standard hearing aid. he *can't* *use* a standard hearing aid. "He would have drainage from his ears, odors from his ears," said Amelia. That meant in-ear hearing aids were off the table. So last fall, doctors tried a different type of implant. the only solution is with an implant that only works with an iphone, which means *none* of the apps you found will help. none of them. it's iphone or be deaf.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noqr27$4i6$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33334 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 00:07:26 -0400, nospam wrote: > first of all it's not a desktop gui. My point was that the iOS GUI is as primitive as the Windows/Linux GUI. > second, while you're obsessing over how to arrange your icons in pretty > shapes, ios is being used to help people do things they otherwise could > not do, I already listed almost a score of things that you "just can't do" on iOS; and where I've found a few more in the interim. For example, how do you set app defaults? On Android (as on desktops), when you first open a file type, a dialog box comes up asking what you want to edit it with (e.g., text with your text editors, video with your video players, images with your image editors, markup with your web browsers, etc.). You can select a particular editor/viewer, or, you can set any particular editor/viewer to be the default, where the list of available editors/viewers is only limited to what you've installed. Can you do that on iOS for all file types?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 23:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <19oi3mb002xwc$.1rrdwnuu2k9e1$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #33354 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC), Aardvarks wrote: > On Android (as on desktops), when you first open a file type, a dialog box > comes up asking what you want to edit it with Never happened in v. 2.3.5 on my Moto Droid X2 when the Kindle for Android that I installed there opened its first .mobi file. What did I do wrong? I have to bend over backward now to get a .mobi file to open in Kindle there. Cheers, -- tlvp BTW: no iOS comparisons because I have no iOS device to compare to. -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 00:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <notll1$1u2i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33372 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 -0400, tlvp wrote: > Never happened in v. 2.3.5 on my Moto Droid X2 when the Kindle for Android > that I installed there opened its first .mobi file. What did I do wrong? I > have to bend over backward now to get a .mobi file to open in Kindle there. > > Cheers, -- tlvp > > BTW: no iOS comparisons because I have no iOS device to compare to. -- tlvp On Android, it works like it's supposed to work. 1. You can unset any specific file association or unset them all. 2. Then you can set any specific file association, or leave it at the default. On iOS, I don't think you have any choice.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 23:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <olkypzgyz6yi.gz0zztvqkk4x$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #33386 |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:10:10 +0000 (UTC), Aardvarks wrote: > On Android, it works like it's supposed to work. > > 1. You can unset any specific file association or unset them all. Really? How? (I ask because I can't, on my Moto Droid X2 w/ A, v.2.3.5). > 2. Then you can set any specific file association, or leave it at the > default. Again I must ask: how? (Cuz I haven't found out how o my own.) > On iOS, I don't think you have any choice. I'm not concerned with iOS. I have no product running iOS. Just tell me how I can get my Android to offer "open with Kindle for Android" as an option when I try to run a .mobi or an .azw file, and I'll be forever in your debt :-) . (As things stand, I must copy the .mobi or the .azw from the external microSD card into a special "kindle" directory within the very cramped area that the phone glibly refers to as its "Internal phone storage", and then hope that the Kindle for Android app spots that new file when it's reopened and kindly offers to let me read it. But that's a kludge!) Thanks. Cheers, -- tlvp PS: in case of confusion, please understand that the "its" in that last parenthetical aside refers to the phone, the "it's" refers to the Kindle for Android app, and the "it" refers to the .mobi or .azw file ... and forgive, please, my sloppy writing. Thanks. And cheers, again, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 22:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Yfxsz.21284$oF2.3720@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #33393 |
tlvp wrote: > I must copy the .mobi or the .azw from the external > microSD card into a special "kindle" directory > within the very cramped area > that the phone glibly refers to as its "Internal phone storage", Try plugging the phone into a PC where it turns into a drive. Then use the Windows file manager to make the transfers. Not so cramped that way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aardvarks <aardvarks@a.b.c.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 06:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <noucl3$mqd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33393 |
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:51:06 -0400, tlvp wrote: >> 1. You can unset any specific file association or unset them all. > > Really? How? (I ask because I can't, on my Moto Droid X2 w/ A, v.2.3.5). It's so easy that you're gonna be embarrassed! :) I'm on Android 4.3 on a Samsung Galaxy S3. I go to the Android "Options > More > Application Manager" and then I hit the hard menu (hamburger) button, and up pops a menu to "Reset app preferences". Here is a screenshot for you that I just bluetoothed over to my PC. http://i.cubeupload.com/CjPxuS.gif >> 2. Then you can set any specific file association, or leave it at the >> default. > > Again I must ask: how? (Cuz I haven't found out how o my own.) Ummm... it's so easy it's hard to describe because it just happens. For example, after I reset the app preferences above, the very next time I want to open (for edit or read) any file, Android will *ask* me (just like all other modern operating systems) what app I want to use. For example, I navigated with ES File Explorer to my call recording folder, which has *.wav files in it, and tapped on an arbitrary *.wav file. Up popped the following form asking me what installed program I want to use to listen to that *.wav file (also allowing me to set it as the default). - ES Chromecast Player - ES Media Player - Google Play Music - Sound player - VLC Here is a screenshot of that action that I just bluetoothed over to my PC: http://i.cubeupload.com/Y3XvcU.gif >> On iOS, I don't think you have any choice. > > I'm not concerned with iOS. I have no product running iOS. I have most operating systems, so I *am* concerned, especially since the iOS guys are kooks who think they're *safer* because Apple Marketing told them that (and they believed it). > Just tell me how I can get my Android to offer "open with Kindle for > Android" as an option when I try to run a .mobi or an .azw file, and I'll > be forever in your debt :-) . Well, I don't have a *mobi or a *.azw file, but, as a test, I created one of each using ES File Explorer on my external SD card. When I clicked on each, it simply said "Sorry, no application available", which makes sense because I don't even know what a mobi or azw file is. http://i.cubeupload.com/nDQXfR.gif However, I then made a file "foo.amr" on my external SD card, and when I clicked on it, it asked me what I wanted to use to open the file. http://i.cubeupload.com/igKS08.gif So, had I an application that knew what a mobi or azw file, it would have done the same for me. It's that easy. > (As things stand, I must copy the .mobi or the .azw from the external > microSD card into a special "kindle" directory within the very cramped area > that the phone glibly refers to as its "Internal phone storage", and then > hope that the Kindle for Android app spots that new file when it's reopened > and kindly offers to let me read it. But that's a kludge!) I can't imagine why the *directory* makes any difference. Doesn't Android key off of the filename extension, just like Windows does? BTW, if you *must* copy files to a certain folder, I would recommend the best freeware file redirecter. It automagically moves files based on almost any criteria, but one of them can be the file name extension. BTW, be careful looking for the best redirect file organizer since *lots* of them stink. This is the best, bar none: Redirect File Organizer by Xavier Tobin https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tobino.redirectsfree
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 19:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msffjqxvq81r$.oopkq1qqd1iv.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #33398 |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:42:44 +0000 (UTC), Aardvarks wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:51:06 -0400, tlvp wrote: > >>> 1. You can unset any specific file association or unset them all. >> >> Really? How? (I ask because I can't, on my Moto Droid X2 w/ A, v.2.3.5). > > It's so easy that you're gonna be embarrassed! :) I'd be overjoyed were that to be the case :-) . > I'm on Android 4.3 on a Samsung Galaxy S3. > I go to the Android "Options > More > Application Manager" and then I hit > the hard menu (hamburger) button, and up pops a menu to "Reset app > preferences". Here on Android 2.3.5 there's no "Options >". So there's no such tap-path. There is a hard menu button, though, and pressing it at a home screen delivers an option Manage Apps. Once that's tapped, I certainly see Amazon Kindle, but if I select that as the app to manage, my only choices are Uninstall, Clear cache, and Share. There's an informational "Launch by default" heading with the info "No defaults set" and an inactive, grayed-out "Clear defaults" button. Nothing about "app preferences". How embarrassing. >>> 2. Then you can set any specific file association, or leave it at the >>> default. >> >> Again I must ask: how? (Cuz I haven't found out how o my own.) I reconfirm: I must still ask "how?" > Ummm... it's so easy it's hard to describe because it just happens. > For example, after I reset the app preferences above, the very next time I > want to open (for edit or read) any file, Android will *ask* me (just like > all other modern operating systems) what app I want to use. Sounds like something you Android 4 does that my Android 2.3.5 doesn't do. > For example, I navigated with ES File Explorer to my call recording folder, > which has *.wav files in it, and tapped on an arbitrary *.wav file. > > Up popped the following form asking me what installed program I want to use > to listen to that *.wav file (also allowing me to set it as the default). > - ES Chromecast Player > - ES Media Player > - Google Play Music > - Sound player > - VLC Bravo! I wish mine would be so considerate :-) . > Here is a screenshot of that action that I just bluetoothed over to my PC: > http://i.cubeupload.com/Y3XvcU.gif Not to worry, I believe you. >>> On iOS, I don't think you have any choice. >> >> I'm not concerned with iOS. I have no product running iOS. > > I have most operating systems, so I *am* concerned, especially since the > iOS guys are kooks who think they're *safer* because Apple Marketing told > them that (and they believed it). No matter how concerned you are with iOS, I'm not. Now the BlackBerry PlayBook OS, *that* could concern me; but not in this thread, thanks :-) . >> Just tell me how I can get my Android to offer "open with Kindle for >> Android" as an option when I try to run a .mobi or an .azw file, and I'll >> be forever in your debt :-) . > > Well, I don't have a *mobi or a *.azw file, but, as a test, I created one > of each using ES File Explorer on my external SD card. > > When I clicked on each, it simply said "Sorry, no application available", ... Exactly what happens to me, too. > which makes sense because I don't even know what a mobi or azw file is. > http://i.cubeupload.com/nDQXfR.gif > > However, I then made a file "foo.amr" on my external SD card, and when I > clicked on it, it asked me what I wanted to use to open the file. > http://i.cubeupload.com/igKS08.gif > > So, had I an application that knew what a mobi or azw file, it would have > done the same for me. > > It's that easy. But I *have* an application that knows what a .mobi and what a .azw file are, and knows how to open them, too. (That's the Amazon Kindle for Android app.) But the part of the Android UI that knows it has no idea what to use to open them does *not* have the humility to ask me "what I wanted to use to open the file." So 'tain't "that easy." >> (As things stand, I must copy the .mobi or the .azw from the external >> microSD card into a special "kindle" directory within the very cramped area >> that the phone glibly refers to as its "Internal phone storage", and then >> hope that the Kindle for Android app spots that new file when it's reopened >> and kindly offers to let me read it. But that's a kludge!) > > I can't imagine why the *directory* makes any difference. > Doesn't Android key off of the filename extension, just like Windows does? Amazon Kindle only looks in that one directory -- named kindle, in Internal storage -- for candidate Kindle books to open. > BTW, if you *must* copy files to a certain folder, I would recommend the > best freeware file redirecter. It automagically moves files based on almost > any criteria, but one of them can be the file name extension. The inbuilt 2.3.5 Files app does that just fine already easy as pi, thanks. > BTW, be careful looking for the best redirect file organizer since *lots* > of them stink. This is the best, bar none: > > Redirect File Organizer by Xavier Tobin > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tobino.redirectsfree Forget sending me there -- it doesn't like my 2.3.5 browser, and it doesn't like my 2.3.5 Play Store app, either. My only choice is to sideload stuff. Still: now what, Kimosabi? Cheers, & thanks, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 19:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <160820161958568852%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #33457 |
In article <msffjqxvq81r$.oopkq1qqd1iv.dlg@40tude.net>, tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote: > Here on Android 2.3.5 yikes. time to upgrade.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 01:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vv6pr5yvstqa.t914kcdpfcsu.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #33459 |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:58:56 -0400, nospam wrote: > In article <msffjqxvq81r$.oopkq1qqd1iv.dlg@40tude.net>, tlvp > <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> wrote: > >> Here on Android 2.3.5 > > yikes. time to upgrade. I quite agree, but neither Motorola nor Google seems interested in helping. Ideas? Thanks. Cheers, -- tlvp -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | AL <noemail@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 23:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <RdTsz.236$x86.207@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #33461 |
tlvp wrote: > nospam wrote: >> tlvp wrote: >>> Here on Android 2.3.5 >> >> yikes. time to upgrade. > > I quite agree, but neither Motorola nor > Google seems interested in helping. How about a Motorola Droid Turbo 2 with 6.0? Only had mine a month but so far I am quite pleased. Its claim to fame is an unbreakable screen. Some guy actually ran it over with a car just to test it. Lots of drop tests also. In many of the tests the phone was damaged or broken...but the screen survived.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.mobile.android
csiph-web