Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

From	Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject	Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
Date	2025-05-09 12:26 -0500
Organization	Modern Human
Message-ID	<vvldt2$egak$2@solani.org> (permalink)
References	(17 earlier) <m7tuqcF8kinU1@mid.individual.net> <b8d3d461b3ab255ae9321788b8bd6836@www.novabbs.org> <m80hnqFko8tU6@mid.individual.net> <b2945a1a51d05407d4f7ebdd57925a4a@www.novabbs.org> <m85ltsFf93lU5@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/9/25 1:34 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch000007, 07.05.2025 um 14:14 schrieb Bertitaylor:
> .
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Tribes' is among the most stupidst concepts for life you could 
>>>>> possibly
>>>>> have.
>>>>
>>>> None more stupid conceptwise than the Germanic and North European 
>>>> tribes
>>>> who are the most tribal going by their awesome Nazi racist theories and
>>>> practices. Which are lies for aggrandization. The price for such
>>>> tribalism has been heavy.
> 
> The inventor of 'scientific racism' was actually Charles Darwin and that 
> an Englishman.
> 
>>>
>>> Sure, there were tribes in ancient times, of course.
>>
>> They still are.
>>>
>>> But how would you define a tribe in modern terms?
>>
>> A group composed of common atavistic tribal values relating to their
>> superiority.
>>>
>>> There were 'tribe revivals' in the 20th century.
>>>
>>> E.g. there have been 'Hippies', 'Mods' or 'Punks'.
>>
>> Disoriented tribals. Real tribes relate to nationality. A nation is one
>> big tribe, or superset of tribes. The nation is thus the updated concept
>> of tribe.
> 
> No
> 
> At least I don't like this interpretation of the word 'nation'.
> 
> It is in common use in anglo-american media, however, but still wrong.
> 
> E.g. they call Apaches (for instance) 'first nation'.
> 
> That is racism and tribalism and by no means acceptable.
> 
> 
> Therefore 'nation' is another name for an independent state.
> 
> To create a 'superset of tribes' as 'nation' and to identify this with 
> the population of a country is simply unacceptable.
> 
> In case of Germany this is also totally wrong, because the Germanic 
> tribes were mainly not living in the area which is today occupied by 
> Germany.
> 
> 
> TH



Oh, now you go for changing the meaning of English terms to escape your 
ass.

You and that Richard Hachel, I think, are the same person. You two smell 
of the same shit.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 16:05 -0500
  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 20:58 -0500
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-17 09:11 +0200
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 13:43 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 16:31 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 16:52 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 17:58 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 19:36 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 10:24 -0500
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 13:46 -0500
  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 12:34 -0500
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 13:59 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 14:37 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 17:19 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 19:39 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 20:06 -0500
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 20:34 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 20:39 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-19 22:11 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 19:17 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 13:56 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 16:34 -0500
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-22 18:06 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-22 23:59 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-23 15:35 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 13:41 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 16:33 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-24 23:38 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-26 07:43 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-04-26 11:39 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-02 10:08 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-04 13:31 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-06 10:17 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-07 06:22 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-07 09:52 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-07 12:14 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-08 08:40 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-08 07:40 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-09 08:34 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-09 09:06 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-10 09:07 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-10 10:11 +0000
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-09 12:26 -0500
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-05-10 09:14 +0200
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-05-07 20:35 -0400
                Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 08:58 -0500

csiph-web