Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #641703
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New version of my annotations to SRT |
| Date | 2024-02-11 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l2rjtaF3nv3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <uir4sk$2rtia$1@paganini.bofh.team> <l2jaq6FitrdU1@mid.individual.net> <uq2ppb$20kdl$1@dont-email.me> <l2om15Fh7b4U1@mid.individual.net> <uq8gj2$3caqt$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 10.02.2024 um 19:51 schrieb Volney: > On 2/10/2024 2:18 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 08.02.2024 um 15:51 schrieb Volney: >>> On 2/8/2024 1:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> >>>> I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these >>>> annotations). >>> >>> No, you weren't. You don't have the qualifications to be a professor, >>> hypothetical or not. Self-awarded degrees/titles are worse than useless, >>> they are signs of crackpottery. >> >> I am actually allowed to write a critique of anything I like. > > There is a BIG difference between "allowed to" and "qualified to" do > something. You don't have the qualifications to be a professor >> >> This is one of the rules of science. >> >> It does not require any kind of qualification or any kind of title to >> critizise any theory you like, because any critique, from whereever it >> might come, is valid. > > You may write whatever garbage you wish to write. You are not qualified > to expect your writings to have any effect on science, or even have > anyone in science to look at them. >> >> And unless such critique is rejected on scientific grounds, it remains >> valid. >> >> You simply cannot dismiss an argument, because the one who wrote it >> has not the appropriate title. > > Sorry, qualifications are necessary to filter out crap. If the same > paper appears as a non peer reviewed post on Usenet authored by Joe > Schmo, Janitor vs. Dr. Schmo, PhD Physics in a peer reviewed document, > which source will be ignored vs. studied? >> >> But in case you like to disprove any of my annotations, you are welcome. >> >> Simply download the file with my annotations (otherwise you can't read >> the annotations), select one of them you regard as faulty and write, >> what exactly is wrong with it. > > I asked before for you to post the most blatant, outrageous, ridiculous, > obvious 'error' that you found to show us you can actually find real > errors. It was ignored. Of the ones anyone has looked at, they are all > simply your misunderstandings or not an error at all. Nobody is going to > wade through 428 misunderstandings of yours hoping to find an actual > error that somehow, nobody in the last 100+ years found. Einstein made several serious errors. One was his method of synchronisation. he had (simplified) this picture in mind: I receive a light signal, which originates from a remote clock and take that signal as information about the remote time. The error: that signal does not contain the remote time, because light needs time to travel. This discrepancy is called 'delay', but Einstein didn't mention it with a single word. Another serious error: he ascribed the effects of motion to the moving object, while it is actually an effect, which is only visible at the side of the observer. That is very similar to the Doppler effect, which is also not audible at the side of the moving source of a sound, but audible at the side of the road, where someone listens to a sirene of a police car passing by. Annoying were Einstein's naming conventions. Especially annoying were the reuse of variable names and the lack of definitions of used symbols. Seriously unscientific were the lack references to the used materials. Especially missing were quotes or references to Poincaré and Heinrich Hertz. This is so, because a few of Einstein's equations were seemingly inspired by Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' (or something similar in French). Heinrich-Hertz was also used, but no references were provided. Also the quotes from Hertz were not verbatim, because Hertz used total derivatives and Einstein partial (in an apparently quoted equation). It ook me quite a while to identify, what Einstein called 'Maxwell-Hertz equation', but found his quote was different to the origional (besides of the obviously missing reference). ... TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-11 11:00 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-13 07:44 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-13 14:50 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-14 08:17 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-14 11:05 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-14 19:05 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 18:41 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-15 06:58 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-15 01:21 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-15 11:19 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-16 06:56 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-16 13:50 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Josey Forakis Stamatelos <ks@osfisek.gr> - 2024-02-16 20:19 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-17 10:28 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-14 13:47 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-14 13:59 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-14 19:12 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-15 06:16 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-13 13:40 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-13 18:18 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-14 01:46 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 18:12 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-14 18:59 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 20:07 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 20:09 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-14 19:21 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 20:26 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-14 20:23 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-14 21:26 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-02-13 16:25 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-14 08:34 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-14 21:28 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-15 07:10 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-15 11:32 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-15 19:04 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-16 07:20 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-16 09:43 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-16 09:46 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-17 10:36 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-17 12:47 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-17 14:33 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-17 16:40 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-17 15:55 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-17 17:16 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-18 06:48 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-18 10:21 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-18 13:00 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-17 15:13 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-17 17:15 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-17 17:17 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-18 06:25 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-18 13:05 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-18 12:56 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-18 22:05 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-18 21:36 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-18 22:59 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-18 05:47 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-18 01:07 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT mlwozniak@wp.pl (MaciejWozniak) - 2024-02-18 08:15 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Preston Voß von Grimmelshausen <rsqt@osonevnpv.de> - 2024-02-18 12:35 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-18 13:08 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Royal Iñíguez Ortega <ygerr@oratoytra.es> - 2024-02-18 12:10 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-18 13:28 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-19 06:56 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-19 11:35 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-19 21:47 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Cheng Huang Zhong <sksn@nnoghz.cn> - 2024-02-19 21:59 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-20 09:01 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-18 11:30 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Wilbert Oláh Barabás <rfbml@otrb.hu> - 2024-02-18 19:39 +0000
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-19 07:02 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-19 13:31 -0500
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-20 09:11 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-21 11:52 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-16 11:53 +0200
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-16 13:59 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 00:11 -0800
csiph-web